Skip to main content

Adaptive learning using a qualitative feedback loop

  • Learning
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
EPIA 91 (EPIA 1991)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 541))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 133 Accesses

Abstract

Most of the example-based learning algorithms developed so far are limited by the fact that they learn unidirectionally, i.e., they just transform the presented examples into a fixed internal representation form and do not adapt their learning strategy according to the results of this transformation process. Only a few learning algorithms incorporate such a feedback from an evaluation of the learned problem representation to the input for the next learning step. But all those rely on quantitative evaluation of the problem representation only, qualitative criteria are always neglected.

In this paper we present the automatic learning environment ALEX which allows for adaptive learning by applying a feedback loop based on quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the problem representation. We follow the idea that the quality of a problem representation determines further knowledge acquisition activities in a certain problem domain. Hence, we derive qualitative evaluation criteria for problem representations and exemplify their successful applicability for an inductive learning strategy, namely example-based learning, in ALEX.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baalen, J.V. (1989) Towards A Theory of Representation Design. MIT, AI-Lab, Technical Report 1128, January 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergadano, F.; Matwin, St., Michalski, R.S.; Zhang, J. (1988): Measuring Quality of Concept Descriptions. In: Proceedings EWSL '88, [eds.] Sleeman, D; Richmond, J., pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bylander, T.; Chandrasekaran, B. (1987): Generic Tasks for Knowledge-Based Reasoning: The “Right” Level of Abstraction for Knowledge Acquisition. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 26, pp. 231–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell, J.G. (1989) Paradigms of Machine Learning. Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 40, pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietterich, T.G. (1989) Limitations on Inductive Learning. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Machine Learning, pp. 124–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emde, W. (1989) Lernen im geschlossenen Kreislauf. (Closed Loop Learning). Wissensbasierte Systeme. 3. Internationaler GI-Kongreß. Oktober. München. Springer-Verlag. pp. 72–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. (1989) Noise-tolerant Conceptual Clustering. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. August 20–25. Detroit, Michigan. Morgan Kaufmann. San Mateo, CA. pp. 825–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. (1987) Knowledge Acquisition Via Incremental Conceptual Clustering. Machine Learning 2: 139–172. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, A.G. (1990): General Limitations on Machine Learning. Proceedings of the ECAI '90, pp. 345–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, J.E. Rosenbloom, P.S., and Newell, A. (1986): Chunking in Soar: The Anatomy of a General Learning Mechanism. Machine Learning 1, pp. 11–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manago, M. and Kodratoff, Y. (1989) Toward a New Generation of ID Algorithms. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI-89. Workshop on Knowledge Discovery from Data. Detroit, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, S.W. (1989) Generating Better Decision Trees. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI-89. pp. 800–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, J.R. (1986) Induction of Decision Trees. Machine Learning, No.1. pp. 81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, J.R. (1988) An Empirical Comparison of Genetic and Decision-tree Classifiers. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Machine Learning. June 12–14. Ann Arbor, Michigan. Morgan Kaufmann. San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepp, R.E. and Michalski, R.S. (1986) Conceptual Clustering: Inventing Goal-oriented Classifications of Structured Objects. In Michalski, R.S., Carbonell, J. and Mitchell, T.M. [eds.] Machine Learning. An Artificial Intelligence Approach. Vol. II. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc. Los Altos. California. pp. 471–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Velde (1988) Learning through Progressive Refinement. In: Proceedings EWSL '88, [eds.] Sleeman, D., Richmond, J., pp. 211–226, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkelbauer, L. and Fedra, K. (1991) ALEX: Automatic Learning in Expert Systems. In: Proceedings Seventh IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications. February 24–28, 1991, Miami Beach, Florida. IEEE Computer Society Press. Los Alamitos, California. pp.59–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Pedro Barahona Luís Moniz Pereira António Porto

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Winkelbauer, L., Stary, C. (1991). Adaptive learning using a qualitative feedback loop. In: Barahona, P., Moniz Pereira, L., Porto, A. (eds) EPIA 91. EPIA 1991. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 541. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54535-2_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54535-2_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54535-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38459-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics