Abstract
This paper tries to lay the basis for a procedural model that could contribute to improve the interoperability of legal ontologies. At the same time it focuses on critical points of current use of legal ontologies due to the fact that often the practice of law is disregarded.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The ICT4LAW project, “ICT Converging on Law: Next Generation Services for Citizens, Enterprises, Public Administration and Policymakers”, is a Converging Technologies 2007 project funded by Regione Piemonte.
- 2.
We disregard the possibility of conceptual ambiguity among the different translations of a Directive in the different languages. Alas, such assumption is not always true, and there can be conceptual differences already in the different linguistic versions of the same directive.
References
Ajani, G., L. Lesmo, G. Boella, A. Mazzei, P. Rossi (2007). Terminological and Ontological Analysis of European Directives: Multilinguism in Law. In The 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Proceedings of the Conference ICAIL’07, 43–48. ACM 2007.
Ajani, G., G. Boella, L. Lesmo, M. Martin, A. Mazzei, D. Radicioni, P. Rossi (2010). Multilevel Legal Ontologies. In E. Francesconi, S. Montemagni, W. Peters, D. Tiscornia (Eds.) Semantic Processing of Legal Texts: Where the Language of Law Meets the Law of Language. LNCS 6036, Springer, Berlin.
Benjamins, V.R., J. Contreras, M. Blázquez, L. Rodrigo, P. Casanovas, M. Poblet (2004). The SEKT Legal Use Case Components: Ontology and Architecture. In T. Gordon (Ed.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2004: The Seventeenth Annual Conference. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 69–77.
Breuker, J., R. Winkels (2003). Use and Reuse of Legal Ontologies in Knowledge Engineering and Information Management. In ICAIL 2003 Workshop on Legal Ontologies & Web based Legal Information Management, 2003.
Gangemi, A., A. Prisco, M.T. Sagri, G. Steve, D. Tiscornia (2003). Some Ontological Tools to Support Legal Regulatory Compliance, With A Case Study. In Workshop WORM Core. LNCS, Springer, Berlin.
Gruber, T. (1995). Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 1995; 43(5–6): 907–928.
Guarino, N. (1998). Formal Ontology in Information Systems. In Proceedings of FOIS’98. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1998, 3–15.
McCarty, L.T. (1989). A Language for Legal Discourse, I. Basic Features. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. Vancouver, Canada, 180–189.
Rossi, P., C. Vogel (2004). Terms and Concepts (2004). Towards a Syllabus for European Private Law. ERPL, 293–300.
Shaheed, J., A. Yip, J. Cunningham (2005). A Top-Level Language-Biased Legal Ontology. In J. Lehmann, et al. (Eds.) LOAIT—Legal Ontologies and Artificial Intelligence Techniques, Bologna 2005, IAAIL Workshop Series No 4, Bologna 2005, 13–24.
Valente, A. (1995). Legal Knowledge Engineering: A Modelling Approach. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995.
Valente, A. (2005). Types and Roles of Legal Ontologies. In LNCS 3369/2005, 65–76.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boella, G., Rossi, P. (2011). The Multi-Layered Legal Information Perspective. In: Sartor, G., Casanovas, P., Biasiotti, M., Fernández-Barrera, M. (eds) Approaches to Legal Ontologies. Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0120-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0120-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0119-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0120-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)