Skip to main content

Mix’n’Match: An Alternative Approach for Combining Ontology Matchers

(Short Paper)

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2013 Conferences (OTM 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8185))

Abstract

The existence of a standardized ontology alignment format promoted by the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) potentially enables different ontology matchers to be combined and used together. Along these lines, we present a novel architecture for combining ontology matchers based on iterative calls of off-the-shelf matchers that exchange information in the form of reference mappings in this standard alignment format. However, we argue that only a few of the matchers contesting in the past years’ OAEI campaigns actually allow the provision of reference alignments to support the matching process. We bypass this lacking functionality by introducing an alternative approach for aligning results of different ontology matchers using simple URI replacement in the aligned ontologies. We experimentally prove that our iterative approach benefits from this emulation of reference alignments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wei Khong Chua, W., Kim, J.-J.: Eff2match results for oaei 2010. In: OM 2010. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cruz, I., Palandri Antonelli, F., Stroe, C.: Efficient selection of mappings and automatic quality-driven combination of matching methods. In: OM 2009. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cruz, I.F., Fabiani, A., Caimi, F., Stroe, C., Palmonari, M.: Automatic configuration selection using ontology matching task profiling. In: Simperl, E., Cimiano, P., Polleres, A., Corcho, O., Presutti, V. (eds.) ESWC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7295, pp. 179–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Dang, T.T., et al.: Hotmatch results for oeai 2012. In: OM 2012. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. David, J., Guillet, F., Briand, H.: Matching directories and owl ontologies with aroma. In: CIKM 2006, pp. 830–831. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Dhamankar, R., Domingos, P., Halevy, A.Y.: Learning to match ontologies on the semantic web. VLDB J. 12(4), 303–319 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eckert, K., Meilicke, C., Stuckenschmidt, H.: Improving ontology matching using meta-level learning. In: Aroyo, L., et al. (eds.) ESWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5554, pp. 158–172. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ehrig, M., Staab, S., Sure, Y.: Bootstrapping ontology alignment methods with APFEL. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 186–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Fensel, D.: Ontologies: A Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce. Springer (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gulić, M., Magdalenić, I., Vrdoljak, B.: Automated weighted aggregation in an ontology matching system. Int’l Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies 7(1), 55–64 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Seddiqui Hanif, M., Aono, M.: An efficient and scalable algorithm for segmented alignment of ontologies of arbitrary size. J. Web Sem. 7(4), 344–356 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hertling, S.: Hertuda results for oeai 2012. In: OM 2012. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jean-Mary, Y.R., Shironoshita, E.P., Kabuka, M.R.: Ontology Matching with Semantic Verification. J. Web Sem. 7(3), 235–251 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jian, N., Hu, W., Cheng, G., Qu, Y.: Falcon-ao: Aligning ontologies with falcon. In: K-Cap 2005 Workshop on Integrating Ontologies, pp. 87–93 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Cuenca Grau, B., Zhou, Y.: Logmap 2.0: towards logic-based, scalable and interactive ontology matching. In: 4th Int’l Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Tools for the Life Sciences, SWAT4LS 2011, pp. 45–46. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kotis, K., Katasonov, A., Leino, J.: Automsv2 results for oaei 2012. In: OM 2012. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maio, P., Bettencourt, N., Silva, N., Rocha, J.: Evaluating a confidence value for ontology alignment. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM 2007), Busan, Korea, November 11. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 304. CEUR-WS.org (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mochol, M., Jentzsch, A.: Towards a rule-based matcher selection. In: Gangemi, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) EKAW 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5268, pp. 109–119. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Ngo, D.H., Bellahsene, Z.: YAM++: (not) Yet Another Matcher for Ontology Matching Task. In: Bases de Données Avancées, France, p. 5 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nikolov, A., d’Aquin, M., Motta, E.: Unsupervised learning of link discovery configuration. In: Simperl, E., Cimiano, P., Polleres, A., Corcho, O., Presutti, V. (eds.) ESWC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7295, pp. 119–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, P., Xu, B.: Lily: Ontology alignment results for oaei 2009. In: OM 2009. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, S., Shen, G., Du, T.: Matching large scale ontology effectively. In: Mizoguchi, R., Shi, Z.-Z., Giunchiglia, F. (eds.) ASWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4185, pp. 99–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Steyskal, S., Polleres, A. (2013). Mix’n’Match: An Alternative Approach for Combining Ontology Matchers. In: Meersman, R., et al. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2013 Conferences. OTM 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8185. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41030-7_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41030-7_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41029-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41030-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics