Skip to main content

The Impact of Latency on Online Classification Learning with Concept Drift

  • Conference paper
Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6291))

Abstract

Online classification learners operating under concept drift can be subject to latency in examples arriving at the training base. A discussion of latency and the related notion of example filtering leads to the development of an example life cycle for online learning (OLLC). Latency in a data stream is modelled in a new Example Life-cycle Integrated Simulation Environment (ELISE). In a series of experiments, the online learner algorithm CD3 is evaluated under several drift and latency scenarios. Results show that systems subject to large random latencies can, when drift occurs, suffer substantial deterioration in classification rate with slow recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kolter, J.Z., Maloof, M.A.: Dynamic Weighted Majority: An ensemble method for drifting concepts. Journal of Machine Learning Research 8, 2755–2790 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Minku, L.L., White, A.P., Yao, X.: The Impact of Diversity on On-line Ensemble Learning in the Presence of Concept Drift. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 730–742 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gao, J., Fan, W., Han, J.: On appropriate assumptions to mine data streams: Analysis and practice. In: Perner, P. (ed.) ICDM 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4597, pp. 143–152. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, H., Yin, J., Pei, J., Yu, P., Yu, J.: Suppressing model over-fitting in mining concept-drifting data streams. In: Proc. KDD 2006, Philadelphia, August 20–23, pp. 736–741 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sculley, D.: Practical learning from one-sided feed-back. In: Proc. of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hickey, R.J.: Structure and Majority Classes in Decision Tree Learning. Journal of Machine Learning 8, 1747–1768 (2007)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Black, M., Hickey, R.J.: Maintaining the performance of a learned classifier under concept drift. Intelligent Data Analysis 3, 453–474 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Marrs, G.R., Hickey, R.J., Black, M.M. (2010). The Impact of Latency on Online Classification Learning with Concept Drift. In: Bi, Y., Williams, MA. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6291. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15280-1_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15280-1_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15279-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15280-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics