Skip to main content

A Comparison of Market Structures with Near-Zero-Intelligence Traders

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning - IDEAL 2009 (IDEAL 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5788))

Abstract

We introduce an agent-based model featuring near-zero-intel-ligence traders operating in a double auction market with a wide range of trading rules governing the determination of prices, which orders are executed as well as a range of parameters regarding market intervention by market makers and the presence of informed traders. We find that our model produces properties that are commonly found in financial markets and which are robust to the trading rules employed, only in some instances the observed properties deviate significantly. We can thus conclude that the properties of returns arising in double auction markets are not very sensitive to the trading rules employed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. O’Hara, M.: Market Microstructure Theory. Blackwell, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Madhavan, A.: Market microstructure: A survey. Journal of Financial Markets 3, 205–258 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gode, D.K., Sunder, S.: Allocative efficiency of markets with zero-intelligence traders: market as a partial substitute for individual rationality. Journal of Political Economy 101, 119–137 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cliff, D., Bruten, J.: Minimal intelligence agents for bargaining behaviors in market-based environments. HP Lab Report HPL-97-91, HP (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cont, R.: Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues. Quantitative Finance 1, 223–236 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Giulio Bottazzi, G.D., Rebesco, I.: Institutional architectures and behavioral ecologies in the dynamics of financial markets. Journal of Mathematical Economics 41, 197–228 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Pellizzari, P., Forno, A.D.: Comparison of different trading protocols in an agent-based market. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination 2, 27–43 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cliff, D.: Explorations in evolutionary design of online auction market mechanisms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2, 162–175 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Krause, A.: Fat tails and multi-scaling in a simple model of limit order markets. Phisica A 368, 183–190 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, X., Krause, A. (2009). A Comparison of Market Structures with Near-Zero-Intelligence Traders. In: Corchado, E., Yin, H. (eds) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning - IDEAL 2009. IDEAL 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5788. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04394-9_86

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04394-9_86

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04393-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04394-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics