Abstract
In this work, we present an illustrative case study of the changing nature of governance structure in a small innovative firm. We show that the governance structure co-evolves with the division of knowledge and the division of labor. The presentation is organized as follows: first we define the distinction between division of knowledge and division of labor and highlight some specificities of the knowledge worker. Then, a case study of an innovative SME in the market for video games for mobile phones is presented. This case study allows us to characterize four different governance phases observed over a four year time span. We then link these four governance phases with the evolution of the relation between the firm and different types of communities (communities of practice in which programmers from other firms participate, user communities ...). We show that the evolution of the governance structure has commonalities with the evolution of the relations with the communities and that those relations influence the division of knowledge and division of labor. This analysis provides basic guidance to elaborate an integrated framework to understand the matching between the division of labor/division of knowledge and the modes and mechanism of community governance in a creative industry.
The authors are very grateful for comments made by the participants in the Schumpeter 2006 Conference and to the anonymous referees. They are also thankful to Monique Flasaquier for her assistance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Antonelli C (2006) The business governance of localized knowledge: an information economics approach for the economics of knowledge. Ind Innovat 13:227–261
Amin A, Cohendet P (2004) The architecture of knowledge: communities, competences and firms. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Amin A, Roberts J (2008) Knowing in action: beyond communities of practice. Res Policy 37: 353–369
Babbage C (1832/1989, The economy of manchinery and munafacturers. In: Cambell-Kelly M (ed) The works of Charles Babbage vol. 8. William Pickering, London
Becker M, Cohendet P, Llerena P (2007) Division of labor and division of knowledge: why the nature of the causality matters for the evolutionary theory of the firm. In Malerba F, Cantner U (eds) Innovation, industrial dynamics and structural transforation: schumpeterian legacies. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 49–66
Ben Mahmoud-Jouini S, Charue-Duboc F, Fourcade F (2007) Favoriser l’innovation radicale dans une entreprise multidivisionnelle: extension du modèle ambidextre à partir de l’analyse d’un cas. Finance Contrôle Stratégie 10:5–41
Brooks PF (1979) The mythical man-month. Addison-Wesley, Boston
Brown JS, Duguid P (1998) Organizing knowledge. Calif Manage Rev 40:90–111
Burger-Helmchen T (2008) Plural-entrepreneurial activity for a single start-up: a case study. J High-Technol Manage, forthcoming
Burger-Helmchen T (2009) Capabilities in small high-tech firms: a case of plural entrepreneurship. J Small Bus Enterprise Dev, forthcoming
Burger-Helmchen T, Guittard C (2008) Are users the next entrepreneurs? A case study on the video game industry. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education 6:57–74.
Chandler A (1969) Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. M.I.T Press, Cambridge
Cohen M (1991) Individual learning and organizational routine: emerging connections. Organ Sci 2:135–139
Cohendet P, Llerena P (2003) Routines and incentives: the role of communities in the firm. Ind Corp Change 12: 271–297
Cohendet P, Llerena P (2005) A dual theory of the firm between transactions and competences: conceptual and empirical considerations. Revue d’Economie Industrielle 2: 175–198
Cohendet P, Llerena P (2010) The knowledge-based entrepreneur: the need for a relevant theory of the firm. In: Malerba F (ed) Knowledge intensive entrepreneurship and innovation systems: evidence from Europe, Routledge
Cohendet P, Llerena P, Marengo L (2000) Is there a pilot in the evolutionary theory of the Firm? In: Foss N, Mahnke V (eds) Competence, governance and entrepreneurship. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 95–115
Cohendet P, Simon L (2007) Playing across the playground: paradoxes of knowledge creation in the videogame firm. J Organ Behav 28:587–605
Choo CW, Bontis N (2002) The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge. Oxford University Press, New York
Dosi G, Marengo L (2007) On the evolutionary and behavioral Theories of organizations: a tentative roadmap. Organ Sci 18:491–502
Edmondson A, Mcmanus SE (2007) Methodological fit in management field research. Acad Manage Rev 32:1155–1179
Ethiraj SK (2007) Allocation of inventive effort in complex product systems. Strategic Manage J 28:563–584
Fransman M (1994) Information, knowledge, vision and theories of the firm. Ind Corp Change 3:713–757
Gavetti G, Levinthal DA (2004) The strategy field from the perspective of management science: divergent strands and possible integration. Manage Sci 50:1309–1318
Hodgson G (1993) Economics and evolution. Polity Press, Cambridge
Kleinbaum AM, Tushman ML (2007) Building bridges: the social structure of interdependent innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship J 1:103–122
Leiblein MJ (2007) Environment, organization, and innovation: how entrepreneurial decisions affect innovative success. Strategic Entrepreneurship J 1:141–144
Loasby B (1998) The organization of capabilities. J Econ Behav Organ 35:139–171
March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2:71–87
Marshall A (1961) Principles of economics. MacMillan, London
Maurer I, Ebers M (2006) Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: lessons from Biotechnology start-ups. Admin Sci Quart 51:262–292
Nonaka IH, Takeuchi C (1995) The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press, New York
O’mahony S, Ferraro F (2007) The emergence of governance in an open source community. Acad Manage J 50:1059–1106
O’reilly C, Tushman C (2004) The ambidextrous organization. Harv Bus Rev 62:74–82
Penrose E (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. John Wiley, New York
Raymond E (1999) The Cathedral and the Bazaar. O’Reilly
Shah SK (2006) Motivation, governance and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Manage Sci 52:1000–1014
Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, Sage
Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Manage J 28:1319–1350
von Hippel E, von Krogh G (2003) Open source software and the private-collective innovation model: issues for organization science. Organ Sci 14:209–223
Witt U (1998) Imagination and leadership: the neglected dimension of the evolutionary theory of the firm. J Econ Behav Organ 35:161–177
Witt U, Zellner C (2007) Knowledge-based entrepreneurship: the organizational side of technology commercialization. In: Malerba F, Brusoni S (eds) Perspectives on innovation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 352–371
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Llerena, P., Burger-Helmchen, T., Cohendet, P. (2009). Division of labor and division of knowledge: A case study of innovation in the video game industry. In: Cantner, U., Gaffard, JL., Nesta, L. (eds) Schumpeterian Perspectives on Innovation, Competition and Growth. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-93777-7_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-93777-7_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-93776-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-93777-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)