Skip to main content

Ex ante impact assessment of land use changes in European regions — the SENSOR approach

  • Chapter
Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes

Abstract

Land use includes those human activities that exhibit a spatial dimension and that change the bio-geophysical conditions of land. Land use policy making at European level aims at fostering sustainability pathways of natural resource use and rural development through the decoupling of economic growth from environmental degradation while supporting social cohesion in rural areas. Targeted policy making requires tools for the ex ante assessment of impacts of policy driven land use changes on sustainable development opportunities in European regions. These tools have to cover all relevant land use sectors and impact issues including their interrelations. They have to be spatially explicit, allow scenario analysis of possible future developments, be based on reproducible analyses, and be transparent and easy to use. The European Commission funded Integrated Project SENSOR is dedicated to develop such ex-ante Sustainability Impact Assessment Tools (SIAT) for land use in European regions. SIAT is designed as a meta modelling toolkit, in which global economic trend and policy scenarios are translated into land use changes at 1km2 grid resolution for the area of Europe. Based on qualitative and quantitative indicator analyses, impacts of simulated land use changes on social, environmental and economic sustainability issues are assessed at regional (NUTS2/3) scale. Valuation of these impacts is based on the concept of multifunctionality of land use. It is conducted through expert and stakeholder valuations leading to the determination of sustainability choice spaces for European regions. This paper presents the analytical approach in SENSOR and describes the impact assessment framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alcamo J, van Vuuren D, Ringler C, Alder J, Bennett E, Lodge D, Masui T, Morita T, Rosegrant M, Sala O, Schulze K, Zurek M (2005). Chapter 6. Methodology for developing the MA scenarios. In: Carpenter S, Pingali P, Bennett E, Zurek M (eds.) Scenarios of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Island Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkman J, Helming K, Müller K, Wiggering H (2004) Multifunctional landscapes: towards an analytical framework for sustainability assessment of agriculture and forestry in Europe. Final Scientific Report. EU FP5 Project EVKCT-2002-80023

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomeo M, Giugni P, Hertin J, Jacob K, Rennings K, Volkery A, Wilkinson D, Zanoni D (2004) Approaches to Impact Assessment in six OECD countries and at the European Commission. IQ-Tools Project report, WP1A

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck S, Born W, Dziock S, Görg C, Hansjürgens B, Henle K, Jax K, Köck W, Neßhöfer C, Rauschmayer F, Ring I, Schmidt-Loske K, Unnerstall H, Wittmer H (2006) The Millenium Ecosystem Assessment and its relevance for Germany. UFZ-Report 2/2006, Leipzig (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker B (1997) Sustainability assessment — a review of values, concepts and methodological approaches. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, CGIAR. Washington, United States

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand N, Jones MLM, Hasler B, Omodei-Zorini L, Petit S, Contini C (2008) Limits and targets for a regional sustainability assessment: an interdisciplinary exploration of the threshold concept. In: Helming K, Tabbush P, Perez-Soba M (Eds). Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, 405–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Bills N, Gross D (2005) Sustaining multifunctional agricultural landscapes: comparing stakeholder perspectives in New York (US) and England (UK). Land Use Policy 22: 313–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boardman J and Poesen J (eds) (2006) Soil Erosion in Europe. Wiley, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhringer C, Löschel A (2006) Computable General Equilibrium Models for Sustainability Impact Assessment, Ecological Economics 60(1), 49–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairol D, Coudel E, Barthélémy D, Caron P, Cudlinova E, Zander P, Renting H, Sumelius J, Knickel KH (2005) Multifunctionality of agriculture and rural areas: from trade negotiations to contributing to sustainable development. New challenges for research. Summary of main results from the MULTAGRI project

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2005) Impact Assessment Guidelines. SEC (2005) 791

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Commission (2006) Review of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy — Renewed Strategy. 10917/06. Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, CGIAR (1995) Report of the Task Force on Sustainable Agriculture. Document No. MTMi95110. Nairobi, Kenya. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot RS, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot RS, Wilson A, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41, 393–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilly O, Rogaß C, Dörrie C, Schneider BU, Siebielec G, Stuczyński T, Korzeniowska-Pucułek R, Koza P, Kowalik M, Łopatka M, Pudełko R, Hallenbarter D, Kräuchi N, Imrichová Z, Putzhuber F, Hasenauer H, Oja T, Kull T, Mander Ü, Moncada S, Camilleri M, Formosa S, Gale R, Hüttl RF (2008) Key sustainability issues and the spatial classification of sensitive regions in Europe. In: Helming K, Tabbush P, Perez-Soba M (eds) Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, 471–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand G, van Huylenbroek G (2003): Multifunctionality and rural development: a regional framework, in: van Huylenbroek G, Durand G (eds.): Multifunctional Agriculture-A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development, Ashgate, Aldershot, 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • European Environmantel Agency (EEA) (2005) European environment outlook. EEA report no. 4/2005. Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2006) Integration of environment into EU agriculture policy — the IRENA indicator-based assessment report. EEA report no. 2/2006. Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1998) Cannibals with Forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Gabriola Island

    Google Scholar 

  • Extern E (2005) “Externalities of Energy: methodology 2005 update”, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington JH, Kuhlman T, Rothman DS, Imrichova Z, Reid L, Konkoly E (2008) Reflections on social and economic indicators for land use change. In: Helming K, Tabbush P, Perez-Soba M (eds). Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, 325–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fougeyrolla P, Le Mouël P, Zagamé P (2001) NEMESIS — New Factors Demands System: Dynamic Duality and Pooled Panel Estimation Techniques. — Working Paper NEMESIS No 3.2

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen P, Kristensen P (2008) An indicators framework for analysing sustainability impacts of land use change. In: Helming K, Tabbush P, Perez-Soba M (eds). Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, 293–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Geist HJ (2005) The causes and progression of desertification. Ashgate Aldershot, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Graveland C, Bouwman AF, de Vries B, Eickhout V, Strengers BJ (2002) Projections of mutli-gas emissions and carbon sinks, and marginal abatement cost functions modelling for land use related sources. RIVM report 461502026. Bilthoven

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen HS, Viuf P, Loibl W, Peters-Anders J, Zudin S, Vogt J (2008) Requirement for data management and maintenance to support regional land use research. In: Helming K, Tabbush P, Perez-Soba M (eds). Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, 269–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckelei T, Britz W (2001). Concept and explorative application of an EU-wide regional agricultural sector model (CAPRI-Projekt). In: Heckelei T, Witzke HP, Henrichsmeyer W (eds). Agricultural Sector Modelling and Policy Information Systems. Proceedings of the 65th EAAE Seminar, March 29–31, 2000 at Bonn University, Vauk Verlag Kiel, Germany, 281–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Helming K, Wiggering H (eds) (2003) Sustainable Development of Multifunctional Landscapes. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Helming K, König B, Tscherning K (2006) SENSOR first annual report (public part) In: Helming K, Wiggering H (eds): SENSOR Report Series 2006/1, http://zalf.de/home_ipsensor/products/sensor_report_series.htm, ZALF, Germany

  • Helming K, Sieber S, Tscherning, K, König, B, Müller K, Wiggering H, Kuhlmann T, Wascher D, Perez-Soba M, Tabbush, P, Dilly O, Bach H (2007) Land use functionality as a frame for impact assessment. In: Knierim A, Nagel UJ, Schäfer C (eds) Managing Economic, Social and Biological Transformations. Margraf Publishers. 33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertin J, Jordan A, Nilsson M, Nykvist B, Russel D, Turnpenny J (2007) The practice of policy assessment in Europe: An institutional and political analysis. Matisse, Working Paper 6. http://www.matisse-project.net/

  • Hoogeven Y, Ribeiro T (2007) Land Use Scenarios for Europe. Background Report. European Environmental Agency. Kopenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2000) Special report on emission scenarios (SRES). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001. The Scientific Basis. Contributions of Working Group 1 to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • INSPIRE (2002) INSPIRE Architecture and Standards Working Group Position Paper. http://inspire.jrc.it

  • Jacob K, Hertin J, Volkery A (2006) Considering environmental aspects in integrated Impact Assessment — lessons learned and challenges ahead. In: George C and Kirkpatrick C (eds): Impact Assessment for a New Europe and Beyond. Edward Elgar Publisher

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob K, Hertin J, Meuwese A, Radaelli R (2007). Preliminary Results from the Country Studies. EVIA (Evaluating Integrated Impact Assessment) report. Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson T, Bakker M, Boitier B, Fougeyrollas A, Helming J, van Meijl H, Verkerk PJ (2008) Cross sector land use modelling framework. In: Helming K, Tabbush P, Perez-Soba M (eds). Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, 159–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones MLM, Petit S, Firbank L, Bertrand N, Geffard G, Rambolinaza M, Granjou C, Boudières V, Omodei-Zorini L, Contini C, Hasler B, De Groot D, Hein L, Luttik J (2006) Regional indicator threshold / risk assessment concepts and Land use Functional approach. SENSOR deliverable D3.2.1. In: Helming K, Wiggering H (eds.): SENSOR Report Series 2006/9, http://zalf.de/home_ipsensor/products/sensor_report_series.htm, ZALF, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallas Z, Gomez-Limon JA, Arriaza M (2007) Are citizens willing to pay for agricultural multifunctionality? Agricultural Economics 26: 405–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karjalainen T, Pussinen A, Liski J, Nabuurs GJ, Eggers T, Lapveteläinen T, Kaipainen T (2003): Scenario analysis of the impacts of forest management and climate change on the European forest sector carbon budget. Forest Policy and Economics 5(2): 141–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn JA, Vullings LAE, Lammeren RJA, van Meijl JCM, van Rheenen T, Veldkamp A, Verburg PH, Westhoek H, Eickhout B, Tabeau AA, (2005) The EURURALIS study: technical document. Alterra Report 1196. Alterra, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlman T (2008) Scenarios — driving forces and policies. In: Helming K, Tabbush P, Perez-Soba M (eds). Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, 131–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin EF, Baulies X, Bockstael N, Fischer G, Krug T, Leemans R, Moran EF, Rindfuss EE, Sato Y, Skole D, Turner BL, Vogel C (1999). Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC) Implementation Strategy. IGBP and IHDP

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander Ü, Wiggering H, Helming K (eds) (2007) Multifunctional land use — meeting future demands for landscape goods and services. Springer. Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier L, Shobayashi M (2001) Multifunctionality: Towards an analytical framework (Agriculture and Food). Paris: OECD

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger MJ, Rounsevell MDA, Acosta-Michlik L, Leemans R, Schröter D (2006) The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 114, 69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millenium Ecosystem Assessment — MEA (2003). Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: A framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Morita T, Robinson J, Alcamo J, Nakicnovic N, Zhou D (2001) Socio-economic and emissions scenarios. Chapter 2 in: Climate Change 2001: Mitigation, Third Assessment Report, Working Group III of the Intergovernmental panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris J, Camilleri M, Moncada S (2008) Key sustainability issues in European sensitive regions — a participatory approach. In: Helming K, Tabbush P, Perez-Soba M (eds). Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, 451–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z, Lieberman AS, (1994) Landscape ecology: theory and application. 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemeier D, De Groot R (2006) Framing environmental indicators: moving from causal chains to causal networks. Environ Dev Sustain (online) DOI 10.1007/s10668-006-9040-9

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001). OECD Environmental outlook. OECD Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004). The Standard Cost Model. A framework for defining and quantifying administrative burdens for businesses. OECD Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojima DS, Galvin KA, Turner BL (1994). The global impact of land use change. BioScience 44(5): 300–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz R, Walton H, Taylor T, Arnold S, Markandya A (2007). Accounting Framework for the Assessment of Externalities. SENSOR Deliverable D2.3.4 In: Helming K, Wiggering H (eds). SENSOR Report Series 2007/6 http://zalf.de/home_ipsensor/products/sensor_report_series.htm, ZALF, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Soba M, Petit S, Jones L, Bertrand N, Briquel V, Omodei-Zorini L, Contini C, Helming K, Farrington J, Tinacci Mossello M, Wascher D, Kienast F, de Groot R (2008) Land use functions — a multifunctionality approach to assess the impacts of land use change on land use sustainability In: Helming K, Tabbush P, Perez-Soba M (eds). Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, 375–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D (1993) World soil erosion and conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Piorr A, Uthes S, Waarts Y, Sattler C, Happe K, Mueller K (2006) Making the multifunctionality concepts operational for impact assessment. In Meyer BC (ed) Sustainable land Use in Intensively Used Agricultural Regions. Landscape Europe. Alterra Report No. 1338, Wageningen. 47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Poschlod P, Bakker JP, Kahmen S (2005) Changing land use and its impact on biodiversity. Basic and Applied Ecology 6(2) 93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potschin M, Haines-Young R (2008) Making Sustainability Impact Assessments: Limits, Thresholds and the Sustainability Choice Space. In: Helming K, Tabbush P, Perez-Soba M (eds). Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, 425–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Renetzeder Ch, van Eupen M, Mücher S, Wrbka T, Wascher D, Kienast F (2006) Spatial Regional Reference Framework (SRRF) — methodology and report. In: Helming K, Wiggering H (eds). SENSOR Report Series 2006/6a. http://zalf.de/home_ipsensor/products/sensor_report_series.htm, ZALF, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Renetzeder C, van Eupen M, Mücher CA, Wrbka T (2008) Clustering Europe:A Spatial Regional Reference Framework for Sustainability Assessment. In: Helming K, Tabbush P, Perez-Soba M (eds). Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, 249–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JF, Staffort Smith DM (eds) (2002) Global Desertification: do humans cause deserts? Dahlem Report 88. Univ. Press. Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano D, Ferrini S (2007) Review paper and data-base on monetary valuation sturides in Test Regions with special attention to the bio-energy policy case. SENSOR deliverable D3.3.2 In: Helming K, Wiggering H (eds). SENSOR Report Series 2007/8. http://zalf.de/home_ipsensor/products/sensor_report_series.htm, ZALF, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Rounsevell MDA, Reginster I, Araujo MB, Carter TR, Dendoncker N, Ewert F, House JI, Kankaanpää S, Leemans R, Metzger MJM, Schmit C, Smith P, Tuck G (2006) A coherent set of future land use change scenarios for Europe. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 114: 57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samaniego-Eguiguren LE, Bárdossy A (2006) Simulation of the Impacts of Land Use/Cover and Climatic Changes on the Runoff Characteritics at the Mesoscale. Ecological Modelling 196: 45–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieber S, Müller K, Verweij P, Haraldsson H, Fricke K, Pacini C, Tscherning K, Helming K, Jansson T (2008) Transfer into decision support: The Sustainability Impact Assessment Tool (SIAT). In: Helming K, Tabbush P, Perez-Soba M (eds). Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, 107–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Slee B (2007) Social indicators for multifunctional rural land use: the case of forestry in the UK. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 120(1): 31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeets E, Weterings R (1999) Environmental indicators: typology and overview. Report nr. 25. European Environmental Agency (EEA). Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabbush P, Frederiksen P (2008). Impact Assessment in the European Commisssion in relation to multifunctional land use. In: Helming K, Tabbush P, Perez-Soba M (eds). Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, 35–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiel A, König K (2008) An institutional analysis of land use modelling in the European Commission. In: Helming K, Tabbush P, Perez-Soba M (eds). Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, 55–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Trisorio A (2004) Measuring sustainability — indicators for Italian agriculture. INEA. National Institute of Agricultural Economics. Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscherning K, König H, Schößer B, Helming K, Sieber S (2008) Ex-ante Impact Assessment (IA) in the European Commission — an overviw. In: Helming K, Tabbush P, Perez-Soba M (eds). Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, 17–33

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme — UNEP (2002) Gobal Environmental Outlook 3, Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Van-Camp L, Bujarrabal B, Gentile AR, Jone RJA, Monatanerella L, Olazabal C, Sevaradjou SK (2004) Report of the Technical Working Groups established under the Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection. EUR 21319 EN/1, 872 pp. Office for Official Publication of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Herwijnen M (2006) Sustainability A-Test web-book http://ivm5.ivm.vu.nl/sat/

  • Van Huylenbroeck G, Vandermeulen V, Mettepenningen E, Verspecht A (2007) Multifunctionality of Agriculture: a review of definitions, evidence and instruments. Living Rev. Landscape Res. 1, 3 http://www.livingreviews.org/lrlr-2007-3

  • Van Ittersum MK, Ewert F, Heckelei, T, Wery, J., Alkan Olsson J, Andersen E, Bezlepkina I, Brouwer F, Donatelli M, Flichman G, Olsson L, Rizzoli AE, van der Wal T, Wien, JE, Wolf, J (2008). Integrated assessment of agricultural systems — a compnent-based framework for the European Union (SEAMLESS). Agricultural Systems 96: 150–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veldkamp A, Verburg PH (2004) Modelling land use change and environmental impact. J. Environ. Manage. 72: 1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg PH, Soepboer W, Veldkamp A, Limpiada R, Espaldon V, Sharifah Mastura SA (2002) Modeling the Spatial Dynamics of Regional Land Use: the CLUE-S Model. Environmental Management, 30(3), 391–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg PH, Rounsevell MDA, Veldkamp A (2006) Scenario-based studies of future land use in Europe. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 114: 1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg PH, Bakker M, Overmars K, Staritsky I (2008) Landscape level simulation of land use change. In: Helming K, Tabbush P, Perez-Soba M (eds). Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, 211–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkery A, Ribeiro T (2007) Prospective environmental analysis of land use development in Europe: from participatory scenarios to long-term strategies. Paper presented at the 2007 Amsterdam Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change “Earth system governance: theories and strategies for sustainability”

    Google Scholar 

  • Wascher DM (2003). Overview on agricultural landscape indicators across OECD countries. In: Dramstad W and Sogge C (eds) Agricultural impacts on landscapes: developing indicators for policy analysis. Proceedings from NIJOS/OECD Expert Meeting on Agricultural Landscape Indicators in Oslo, Norway, October 7–9, 2002. 19–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggering H, Mueller K, Werner A, Helming K (2003) The concept of multifunctionality in sustainable land development. In: Helming K, Wiggering H (eds) Sustainable Development of Multifunctional Landscapes. Springer. 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggering H, Dalchow C, Glemnitz M, Helming K, Müller K, Schultz A, Stachow U, Zander P (2006) Indicators for multifunctional land use — Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials. Ecological Indicators 6: 238–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Binder C (2005). Solution spaces for decision making — a sustainability assessment tool for city-regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25: 589–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development WCED (1987). Our Common Future. New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Zander P, Knierim A, Groot JCJ, Rossing WAH (2007): Multifunctionality of agriculture: Tools and methods for impact assessment and valuation (Editorial). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 120: 1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Helming, K. et al. (2008). Ex ante impact assessment of land use changes in European regions — the SENSOR approach. In: Helming, K., Pérez-Soba, M., Tabbush, P. (eds) Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78648-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics