Skip to main content

Incremental Resolution of Model Inconsistencies

  • Conference paper
Recent Trends in Algebraic Development Techniques (WADT 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4409))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

During model-driven software development, we are inevitably confronted with design models that contain a wide variety of inconsistencies. Interactive and automated support for detecting and resolving these inconsistencies is therefore indispensable. In this paper, we report on an iterative inconsistency resolution process. Our approach relies on the underlying formalism of graph transformation. We exploit the mechanism of critical pair analysis to analyse dependencies and conflicts between inconsistencies and resolutions, to detect resolution cycles and to analyse the completeness of resolutions. The results of this analysis are integrated in the iterative inconsistency resolution process and can help the software engineer to develop and evolve models in presence of inconsistencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balzer, R.: Tolerating inconsistency. In: Proc. Int’l Conf. Software Engineering, pp. 158–165. ACM Press, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Object Management Group: Unified Modeling Language 2.0 Superstructure Specification (2005), http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/apps/doc?formal/05-07-04.pdf

  3. Warny, J.F.: Détection et résolution des incohérences des modèles UML avec un outil de transformation de graphes. Master’s thesis, Université de Mons-Hainaut, Belgium (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rozenberg, G.: Handbook of graph grammars and computing by graph transformation: Foundations, vol. 1. World Scientific, Singapore (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ehrig, H., Engels, G., Kreowski, H.-J., Rozenberg, G.: Handbook of graph grammars and computing by graph transformation: Applications, Languages and Tools, vol. 2. World Scientific, Singapore (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Plump, D.: Hypergraph rewriting: Critical pairs and undecidability of confluence. In: Term Graph Rewriting, pp. 201–214. Wiley, Chichester (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Taentzer, G.: AGG: A graph transformation environment for modeling and validation of software. In: Pfaltz, J.L., Nagl, M., Böhlen, B. (eds.) AGTIVE 2003. LNCS, vol. 3062, pp. 446–453. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ehrig, H., Prange, U., Taentzer, G.: Fundamental theory for typed attributed graph transformation. In: Ehrig, H., Engels, G., Parisi-Presicce, F., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) ICGT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3256, pp. 161–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hausmann, J.H., Heckel, R., Taentzer, G.: Detection of conflicting functional requirements in a use case-driven approach. In: Proc. Int’l Conf. Software Engineering, pp. 105–115. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mens, T., Taentzer, G., Runge, O.: Analyzing refactoring dependencies using graph transformation. Software and Systems Modeling (to appear, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mens, T., Van Der Straeten, R., D’Hondt, M.: Detecting and resolving model inconsistencies using transformation dependency analysis. In: Nierstrasz, O., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 200–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Biermann, E., Ehrig, K., Köhler, C., Kuhns, G., Taentzer, G., Weiss, E.: Graphical definition of in-place transformations in the eclipse modeling framework. In: Nierstrasz, O., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 425–439. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Lange, C.F.J., Chaudron, M.R.V.: An empirical assessment of completeness in UML designs. In: Proc. Int’l Conf. Empirical Assessment in Software Engineering, pp. 111–121 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lange, C., Chaudron, M., Muskens, J.: In practice: UML software architecture and design description. IEEE Software 23(2), 40–46 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lange, C.F.J., Chaudron, M.R.V.: Effects of defects in UML models – an experimental investigation. In: Proc. Int’l Conf. Software Engineering, pp. 401–410. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mens, T., Kniesel, G., Runge, O.: Transformation dependency analysis - a comparison of two approaches. Série L’objet - logiciel, base de données, réseaux, 167–182 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ehrig, H., Ehrig, K., de Lara, J., Taentzer, G., Varró, D., Varró-Gyapay, S.: Termination criteria for model transformation. In: Cerioli, M. (ed.) FASE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3442, pp. 49–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wijsen, J.: Database repairing using updates. Trans. Database Systems 30(3), 722–768 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rensink, A.: The GROOVE simulator: A tool for state space generation. In: Pfaltz, J.L., Nagl, M., Böhlen, B. (eds.) AGTIVE 2003. LNCS, vol. 3062, pp. 479–485. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Van Der Straeten, R., Mens, T., Simmonds, J., Jonckers, V.: Using description logics to maintain consistency between UML models. In: Stevens, P., Whittle, J., Booch, G. (eds.) «UML» 2003 - The Unified Modeling Language. Modeling Languages and Applications. LNCS, vol. 2863, pp. 326–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Van Der Straeten, R.: Inconsistency Management in Model-driven Engineering. An Approach using Description Logics. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Egyed, A.: Instant consistency checking for the UML. In: Proc. Int’l Conf. Software Engineering, pp. 381–390. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, W., Easterbrook, S., Mylopoulos, J.: Rule-based detection of inconsistency in UML models. In: Jézéquel, J.-M., Hussmann, H., Cook, S. (eds.) «UML» 2002 - The Unified Modeling Language. Model Engineering, Concepts, and Tools. LNCS, vol. 2460, pp. 106–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Goedicke, M., Meyer, T., Taentzer, G.: Viewpoint-oriented software development by distributed graph transformation: Towards a basis for living with inconsistencies. In: Proc. Requirements Engineering 1999, pp. 92–99. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ehrig, H., Tsioalikis, A.: Consistency analysis of UML class and sequence diagrams using attributed graph grammars. In: ETAPS 2000, workshop on graph transformation systems, pp. 77–86 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hausmann, J.H., Heckel, R., Sauer, S.: Extended model relations with graphical consistency conditions. In: Proc. UML 2002, Workshop on Consistency Problems in UML-Based Software Development, pp. 61–74 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

José Luiz Fiadeiro Pierre-Yves Schobbens

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mens, T., Van Der Straeten, R. (2007). Incremental Resolution of Model Inconsistencies. In: Fiadeiro, J.L., Schobbens, PY. (eds) Recent Trends in Algebraic Development Techniques. WADT 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4409. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71998-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71998-4_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71997-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71998-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics