Skip to main content

A Performative Type Hierarchy and Other Interesting Considerations in the Design of the CASA Agent Architecture

  • Conference paper
Advances in Agent Communication (ACL 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2922))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we describe several interesting design decisions we have taken (with respect to inter- agent messaging) in the re-engineered CASA architecture for agent communication and services. CASA is a new architecture designed from the ground up; it is influenced by the major agent architectures such as FIPA, CORBA, and KQML but is intended to be independent (which doesn’t imply incompatible). The primary goals are flexibility, extendibility, simplicity, and ease of use. The lessons learned in the earlier implementation have fed the current design of the system. Among the most interesting of the design issues are the use of performatives that form a type lattice, which allows for observers, who do not necessarily understand all the performatives, to nonetheless understand a conversation at an appropriate semantic level. The new design considerations add a great deal of flexibility and integrity to an agent communications architecture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becerra, G.: A Security Pattern for Multi-Agent Systems. In: Far, B.H., Rochefort, S., Moussavi, M. (eds.) Proceedings of Agent Based Technologies and Systems, Calgary, Canada, August 2003, pp. 142–153 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chopra, A., Singh, M.P.: Nonmonotonic Commitment Machines. In: Dignum, F.P.M. (ed.) ACL 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2922, pp. 183–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Finin, T., Labrou, Y.: KQML as an Agent Communication Language. In: Bradshaw, J.M. (ed.) Software Agents, pp. 291–316. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Flores, R.A.: Modelling Agent Conversations for Action. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Canada (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Flores, R.A., Kremer, R.C.: To Commit or Not To Commit: Modelling Agent Conversations for Action. In: Chaib-draa, B., Dignum, F. (eds.) Computational Intelligence, Special Issue on Agent Communication Languages, May 2002, vol. 18(2), pp. 120–173. Blackwell Publishing, Malden (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fornara, N., Colombetti, M.: Protocol Specification using a Commitment-based ACL. In: Dignum, F.P.M. (ed.) ACL 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2922, pp. 108–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (FIPA). FIPA Communicative Act Repository Specification. Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (October 18, 2002), http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00037/

  8. Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (FIPA). FIPA Interaction Protocol Library Specification. Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (August 10, 2001), http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00025/XC00025E.html#_Toc505480198

  9. Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (FIPA). FIPA Specifications, Version 1 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley Professional Computing Series. Addison- Wesley, Reading (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mallya, A.U., Yolum, P., Singh, M.: Resolving Commitments Among Autonomous Agents. In: Dignum, F.P.M. (ed.) ACL 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2922, pp. 166–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Saeed, J.I.: Semantics. Blackwell Publishers Ltd., Oxford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thurgood, G.: English 222: Pedagogical Grammar. English Department, California State University, Chico, August 2002, ch. 9, http://www.csuchico.edu/~gt18/222/Ch%2009.pdf

  14. Verdicchio, M., Colombetti, M.: A logical model of social commitment for agent communication. In: Dignum, F.P.M. (ed.) ACL 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2922, pp. 128–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Extensible Markup Language (XML). Architecture Domain, World Wide Web Consortium (October 14, 2002), http://www.w3.org/XML/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kremer, R., Flores, R., La Fournie, C. (2004). A Performative Type Hierarchy and Other Interesting Considerations in the Design of the CASA Agent Architecture. In: Dignum, F. (eds) Advances in Agent Communication. ACL 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2922. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24608-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24608-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20769-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24608-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics