Skip to main content

Assessment of Fieldwork Methodologies for Educational Purposes in Sustainability Science: Exercise on Resilience, Tohoku Unit 2015

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability Science: Field Methods and Exercises

Abstract

This chapter introduces the Tohoku Unit, a GPSS-GLI Exercise on Resilience conducted in the northeastern area of the Honshu Island in Japan. This unit consists of a one-week educational fieldwork, where students are exposed to the reconstruction process in Otsuchi Town, Iwate Prefecture that has followed the Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami of March 2011. In the present chapter an assessment of the field exercise is presented in two levels of depth, (1) an application of field methodologies to identify sustainability issues in the reconstruction process, and (2) the contribution of the fieldwork to the development of student’s competencies relevant to sustainability research, following the framework of key competencies in sustainability proposed by Wiek et al. (Sustainability Science 6(2):203–218, 2011a; Environment 53(2):3–13, 2011b). The authors discuss the relationship between the field methodologies utilized and the results obtained in the two levels of the assessment. The results indicate that the field methodologies utilized contributed to a high number of reconstruction issues being identified, with the majority of issues belonging to the social dimension. Also, the different lectures attended during the field work and preparatory work highlighted the highest number of issues identified amongst all three sustainability dimensions (social, economic, environmental). Regarding the competencies, students seem to recognize the importance of the five competencies suggested by Wiek et al. (Sustainability Science 6(2):203–218, 2011a; Environment 53(2):3–13, 2011b), and overall consider the contribution of the field exercise as “satisfactory” to “effective” in promoting these competencies. Final remarks highlight the relevance of considering this framework for future improvements in the design of the units by considering the main competencies that they intend to foster in the students. Also, the authors highlight some of the limitations of the framework in capturing the whole experience of students in the field, and the need to incorporate a deeper analysis of the concept of resilience in future assessments of this field exercise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ansari, W. E., & Stibbe, A. (2009). Public health and the environment: What skills for sustainability literacy—and why? Sustainability, 1, 425–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baartman, L. K., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2007). Evaluating assessment quality in competence-based education: A qualitative comparison of two frameworks. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 114–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, M., Godemann, J., Rieckmann, M., & Stoltenberg, U. (2007). Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(4), 416–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benware, C. A., & Deci, E. L. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 755–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, I. (2012). The handbook of sustainability literacy: Skills for a changing world. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 719–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036-1183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, Y. (2013). An empirical study of learning outcomes based on active versus passive teaching styles. International Journal of Education and Management Engineering, 1, 39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, G. (2006). The BLK ‘21’programme in Germany: A ‘Gestaltungskompetenz’-based model for education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 12(1), 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteban, M., Onuki, M., Ikeda, I., & Akiyama, T. (2015). Reconstruction following the 2011 Tohoku earthquake tsunami: Case study of Otsuchi Town in Iwate prefecture, Japan. Handbook of Coastal Disaster Mitigation for Engineers and Planners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, E. (2014, July 28). Engineering Education: The U.S. Department of Education Releases Innovative Initiatives. Retrieved from Homeroom: The official blog of the US Department of Education. http://blog.ed.gov/2014/07/engineering-education-the-u-s-department-of-education-releases-innovative-initiatives/.

  • Frisk, E., & Larson, K. L. (2011). Educating for sustainability: Competencies & practices for transformative action. Journal of Sustainability Education, 2, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Assembly of United Nations (2012). The future we want. A/RES/66/288.

    Google Scholar 

  • GPSS-GLI. (2015). Retrieved January 11, 2016 from http://www.sustainability.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/.

  • Gunderson, L. H. (2002). Resilience and the behavior of large-scale systems (Vol. 60). Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Education for Sustainable Development Practice. (2008). Report from the International Commission on Education for Sustainable Development Practice, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwate Prefectural Government, Coastal Region Development Bureau (2015, September) On the state of reconstruction from the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami [PDF document].

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel, N., Cater, J. J., & Varela, O. (2009). Active versus passive teaching styles: An empirical study of student learning outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20(4), 397–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mochizuki, Y., & Fadeeva, Z. (2010). Competences for sustainable development and sustainability: Significance and challenges for ESD. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(4), 391–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otsuchi Town Government, Disaster Recovery Bureau, Recovery Measures Promotion Office. (2015). Status of Rebuilding Efforts in Otsuchi-cho, Iwate Prefecture [PDF document].

    Google Scholar 

  • Resilience Alliance. (2010). Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems: Workbook for practitioners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D. (2007). Education for a sustainable future. SCIENCE-NEW YORK THEN WASHINGTON-, 317(5836), 323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segalas, J., Ferrer-Balas, D., Svanström, M., Lundqvist, U., & Mulder, K. F. (2009). What has to be learnt for sustainability? A comparison of bachelor engineering education competences at three European universities. Sustainability Science, 4(1), 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, K. (2008) Higher education for sustainability: Seeking affective learning outcomes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(1), 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorhees, R. A. (2001). Competency-Based learning models: A necessary future. New directions for institutional research, 2001(110), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2011a). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6(2), 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., Redman, C., & Mills, S. B. (2011b). Moving forward on competence in sustainability research and problem solving. Environment, 53(2), 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willard, M., Wiedmeyer, C., Warren Flint, R., Weedon, J. S., Woodward, R., & Feldman, I., et al. (2010). The sustainability professional: 2010 competency survey report. Environmental Quality Management, 20(1), 49–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Graduate Program in Sustainability Science—Global Leadership Initiative for providing the opportunity to participate in this field exercise and in the present book. In particular, the authors thank the faculty involved in the organization of the Tohoku Unit, Dr. Motoharu Onuki, Dr. Miguel Esteban and Ms. Izumi Ikeda. Acknowledgements go to the people of Otsuchi Town, Otsuchi Town Government and Iwate Prefectural Government, as well as to AORI Research Institute and Iwate University. Finally, the authors acknowledge the great contribution of Mr. Orlando Vargas and Mr. Yangqing Chen to the discussion during the assessment of this unit.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo O. San Carlos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

San Carlos, R.O., Tyunina, O., Yoshida, Y., Mori, A., Sioen, G.B., Yang, J. (2016). Assessment of Fieldwork Methodologies for Educational Purposes in Sustainability Science: Exercise on Resilience, Tohoku Unit 2015. In: Esteban, M., Akiyama, T., Chen, C., Ikeda, I., Mino, T. (eds) Sustainability Science: Field Methods and Exercises. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32930-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics