Skip to main content

Paleolithic and Neolithic Cultures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Exploring Ancient Skies

Abstract

For most of the Paleolithic period [or Old Stone Age, beginning more than ~21/2 million years before present (b.p.)], there are few materials that could be interpreted as relevant to human understanding of astronomy, even in the vaguest terms. Evidence for interest in the heavenly bodies has been suggested only for Australia (see §11) and for Western Europe during the Upper Paleolithic (70,000 to ~10,000 years b.p.). A critical summary of the European Upper Paleolithic is provided by Hadingham (1979) in Secrets of the Ice Age. Despite its provocative title and popular nature, this work reviews the results of modern scholarship about the hunters and gatherers of the last 70,000 years or so, mostly from Italy, France, and Spain. He emphasizes the difference of the environment of that time from any existing today: colder, wetter, but in some ways richer, with vastly different fauna. He discusses both continuities and changes among human populations, their tool kits, and other aspects of the culture. The people were Neanderthals (Homo sapiens neanderthalensis) or Cro-Magnon (Homo sapiens sapiens)—both much like ourselves in physical type and inherent capabilities. They were skilled in making stone tools and had some crude housing, at least in some areas. They depended heavily on game, and some became skilled (and perhaps overspecialized) reindeer hunters. Others depended on wild cattle, and most groups probably killed a wide range of animals. Gathering of vegetable foods was surely of great importance, although usually this must be inferred from sketchy evidence. Fishing was probably of some importance, with more lakes and streams than today. Most sites that were then along the coast, where we might expect some evidence of fishing and indications of whether it was based on use of good watercraft, are now sunk deep beneath coastal waters, which have risen many meters since the melting of so much glacial ice. It has been suggested that in some areas there were substantial attempts to control the animal populations and that some of the reindeer could be considered as having been at least semidomesticated. Similar suggestions have been made for horses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The same criticism applies to the use of certain features of a site, for example, the Aubrey holes at Stonehenge, which are to some a stone age computer (or perhaps abacus?), and to others a collection of 56 chalk-filled holes arranged (more or less) around a circle.

  2. 2.

    See Broadbent (1955). The test involves the average of the squares of deviations.

  3. 3.

    The modern inch, span, fathom, and foot all have such anthropological origins.

  4. 4.

    Recall that we have defined azimuth to be measured from the North Point (in the Northern Hemisphere) positive eastward. With a similar convention for treating azimuths at Southern Hemisphere sites, measured from the South Point eastward, the same comment holds for the Southern Hemisphere.

  5. 5.

    Tradition implies a common background. A convergent tradition involves groups becoming more alike, usually because of common external factors. A parallel tradition merely preserves common, older features, but that may not have been originally explicit.

  6. 6.

    We say “almost” because the obliquity of the ecliptic has decreased by about 0.5° over that interval, decreasing the azimuth of rise of the midwinter Sun by about 1°.

  7. 7.

    In her book on Polynesia, Makemson (1941, p. 22) refers to “the spiraling path of the Sun.”

  8. 8.

    The designations of the standing stones are those of M.J. O’Kelly: proceeding clockwise from the tomb entrance, but allowing for gaps, as GC1, GC3, and so on; and the stones proceeding in a counterclockwise direction just to the northeast of GC1 are labeled GC-1, GC-2, and so on.

  9. 9.

    Generally, the chance probability in achieving 1 successes out of N trials in any situation in which the probability of a “success” is p can be written: NC1 p 1(1 − p)N−1, where NC1 is the number of ways (combinations) to achieve these successes: NC1 + N!/[1! × (N − 1)!] = [N × (N − 1) × (N − 2) × . . . (N − 1 + 1)]/[1 × 2 × . . . × 1].

  10. 10.

    Celtic deities, later euhemerized to become early rulers of Ireland.

  11. 11.

    The rising line of the ecliptic is tilted toward the south in the spring and north in the fall (see Figure 2.20). Thus, the diurnal path of the Sun continuously varies in a small but discernible way and with it the azimuth and altitude that together determine shadowing effects. Here, the effect may be enhanced by altitude variation along the eastern horizon.

  12. 12.

    Thor, the northern axe and thunder god, became the ruler of our day Thursday, the day of Jupiter in the planetary week.

  13. 13.

    Linguists use an asterisk to mark recontructed forms. See §11.4, footnote 10.

  14. 14.

    The other coves are located at Stanton Drew in Somerset (where it lies WSW of the main circle) and faces roughly south, at Cairnpapple in West Lothian and faces east, and at Avebury, where it faces NE.

  15. 15.

    In Greek, σφαιροειδη

    .

  16. 16.

    “Community” may be a better rendering of the Greek πóλιν in this case.

  17. 17.

    The wren appears as Bασιλισκος or “little king” in classical Greek, as Regulus and rex avium in Latin, and similarly in Italian, Spanish, French, German, Dutch, Danish, Swedish, English, and Welsh.

  18. 18.

    In 18th-century Ireland and on the Isle of Man, the wren was killed on Christmas Day and was hung by a leg from two hoops crossed at right angles.

  19. 19.

    It was this feature that so impressed Thom and was so critical in the development of modern archaeoastronomy.

  20. 20.

    Geoffrey of Monmouth’s History of the Kings of England contains a summary of legends regarding the site.

  21. 21.

    Named after John Aubrey. Aubrey inspected and reported on the site for Charles II, beginning in 1663. His description of the chalk-filled holes is contained in his unpublished manuscript entitled Monumenta Brittanica now in the Bodleian Library, Oxford.

  22. 22.

    A stone layer that extended upstream from the boulders appeared to be artificial in terms of location and in the orientation and dip of the stones themselves.

  23. 23.

    The perturbation is actually on the inclination; at a major/minor standstill, however, the perturbation adds directly to the declination; see Figure 2.17b.

  24. 24.

    The apparent variation in declination of the Moon, whether in the 18.y61, the 27.d32 or 173.d3 cycles, or that of the Sun in the 365.d2422 cycle, is sinusoidal and at the peak of the cycle can be approximated by an expression such as Δδ = δmax − δmax × cos(2π × Δt/P), where Δt is the time interval from the maximum value of the declination, δ. From this, Δδ = δmax × [1 − cos(2π × t/P)] = δmax × [2 sin2 (π × Δt/P)], which for short intervals from the moment of maximum (i.e., for Δt << P), becomes Δδ = 2δmax × (π × Δt/P)2 = kt)2.

  25. 25.

    The quantity G can also be understood geometrically as a sagitta. Given the stepping technique, and the tracing of a parabolic arc on the ground, it is the line between a point on the arc midway between the two stakes and the center of the straight line between the two stakes.

  26. 26.

    One of the questions raised about the site of Kintraw, discussed above, was whether the ledge provided sufficient space to recreate the alignment within a day.

References

  • Agius, G., and Ventura, F. 1981. “Investigation into the Possible Astronomical Alignments of the Copper Age Temples in Malta,” Archaeoastronomy 4(1), 10–21.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R.J.C. 1956/1979. Stonehenge: Archaeology and Interpretation. (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1956; Penguin, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R.J.C. 1961. “Neolithic Engineering.” Antiquity 35, 292–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J.W. 1972. The Stone Circles of Cork and Kerry: A Study M.A. thesis. (Cork: National University of Ireland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brace, G.I. 1987. Boulder Monuments of Saskatchewan, M.A. dissertation. (Edmonton, Alberta: Department of Anthropology, University of Alberta).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M. 1983. The Stars and the Stones: Ancient Art and Astronomy in Ireland. (London: Thames & Hudson). (Reviews by R. Hicks: Archaeoastronomy 6, 141–144, 1983; G. Daniel: Nature 306, 516). Largely reproduced with some additional material as The Stones of Time. Inner Traditions International, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinckerhoff, R.E. 1976. “Astronomically-Oriented Markings on Stonehenge,” Nature 263, 465–469.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, S.R. 1955. “Quantum Hypotheses,” Biometrika 42, 45–57.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brumley, D.J. 1986. Medicine Wheels on the Northern Plains: A Summary Appraisal. (Calgary, AB: Ethos Consultants, Ltd., for the Archaeological Survey of Aberta). Reprinted 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkert, W. 1972. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism tr. E.L. Minan, Jr. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burl, A. 1976/1989. The Stone Circles of the British Isles. (New Haven: Yale University Press). 410 pp. (Reviews by R.L. Merritt: American Scientist 65, 376, 1977; S.L. Gibbs: Archaeoastronomy 2(3), 19). (7th printing, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burl, A. 1979/1986. Rings of Stone: The Prehistoric Stone Circles of Britain and Ireland. (New Haven: Ticknor and Fields). 2nd ed. (New Haven: Yale Univ. Press). (Reviews of 1st ed. by R.J.C. Atkinson: Nature 282, 175–176, 1979; Nature 284, 700, 1980; G.S. Hawkins: Archaeoastronomy 2(4), 25–27, 1979; G.E. Hutchinson: American Scientist 67, 728, 1979; R. Hicks: Archaeology 33(4), 68, 1980; S. Milisauskas: American Anthropologist 82, 882, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burl, A. 1985. “Stone Circles: The Welsh Problem,” Council for British Archaeology Report 35, 72–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burl, A. 1987. The Stonehenge People. (London: J.M. Dent & Sons). 249 pp. (Review by A. Whittle in Journal for the History of Astronomy 19, Archaeoastronomy (12), S85–88. 1988.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burl, A. 1993. From Carnac to Callanish: The Prehistoric Stone Rows and Avenues of Britain, Ireland, and Brittany. (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. 1988b. Historical Atlas of World Mythology. I. The Way of the Animal Powers. Part 2. Mythologies of the Great Hunt. (New York: Perennial Library, Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clagett, M. 1995. Ancient Egyptian Science II: Calendars, Clocks, and Astronomy. (Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, J. 1973. Archaeology by Experiment. (New York: Scribners).

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Errico, F. 1989. “Palaeolithic Calendars—A Case of Wishful Thinking?” Current Anthropolgy 30(1), 117–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Errico, F. 1992. “Reply to A. Marshack,” Rock Art Research 8(3), 122–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, W.E. 1976. “A Possible Pythagorean Triangle at Stonehenge,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 7, 141.

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, J.A. 1974. “Astronomical Alignment of the Bighorn Medicine Wheel,” Science 184, 1035–1043.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Eogan, G. 1986. Knowth and the Passage Tombs of Ireland. (London: Thames & Hudson). 247 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer, J.G. 1912. The Golden Bough 12 vol. ed. (1911–1915) (London: MacMillan). Older editions: 2 vols., 1890; 3 vols., 1900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, R. 1955–1957. The Greek Myths. (New York: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadingham, E. 1976. Circles and Standing Stones. (Garden City: Doubleday).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadingham, E. 1979. Secrets of the Ice Age. (Walker: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbison, P. 1970/1992. Guide to National and Historical Monuments of Ireland. (Dublin: Gill & Macmillan). 384 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, G.S. 1965b. “Callanish, A Scottish Stonehenge,” Science 147, 127.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, G.S. 1966. Astro-Archaeology. (Cambridge: University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heggie, D.C. 1981b. Megalithic Science: Ancient Mathematics and Astronomy in Northwest Europe. (London: Thames & Hudson). (Reviews by A.S. Thom: Archaeoastronomy 5(4), 24–27, 1982; G.S. Hawkins: The Sciences 23(4), 56).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbron, J.L. 1999. The Sun in the Church: Cathedrals as Solar Observatories. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskin, M. 1985. “The Talayotic Culture of Menorca: A First Reconnaissance,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 16, Archaeoastronomy Suppl. (9), S133–S151.

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskin M. 1991. “The Taulas of Menorca.” IInd Deya International Conference of Prehistory, Recent Developments in Western Mediterranean Prehistory: Archaeological Techniques, Technology, and Theory. Volume II. Archaeological Technology and Theory. Eds., W.H. Waldren, J.A. Ensenyat, and R.C. Kennard (BAR International Series 573) pp. 217–236. (Oxford: Tempus Reparatum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskin, M., Allan, E., and Gralewski, R. 1993. “The Tombe di Gigante and Temples of Noraghic Sardinia,” Journal of the History of Astronomy 24, Archaeoastronomy Suppl. (18), S1–S26.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskin, M., Allan, E., and Gralewski, R. 1994a. “Studies in Iberian Archaeoastronomy: (1) Orientations of the Megalithic Sepulchres of Almeria, Granada, and Malaga,” Journal of the History of Astronomy 25, Archaeoastronomy Suppl. (19), S55–S82.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskin, M., Allan, E., and Gralewski, R. 1994b. “Orientations of Corsican Dolmens,” Journal of the History of Astronomy 25(4), 313–316.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskin, M., Allan, E., and Gralewski, R. 1995. “Studies in Iberian Archaeoastronomy: (2) Orientations of the Tholos Tombs of Almeria,” Journal of the History of Astronomy 26, Archaeoastronomy Suppl. (20), S29–S48.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, F. 1977a. On Stonehenge. (New York: W.H. Freeman). 160 pp. (Review by G. Moir: Antiquity 53, 124, 1979; J.E. Wood: Archaeoastronomy 3(3), 37–38).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffer, C., Trinklein, F., and Bunge, M. 1967. An Introduction to Astronomy. (New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, A.B. 1981. “The Cultural Significance of the Moose Mountain Observatory,” Archaeoastronomy 4(1), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, T.F., and Kehoe, A.B. 1977. “Stones, Solstices, and Sun Dance Structures,” Plains Anthropologist 22, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKie, E.W. 1974. “Archaeological Tests on Supposed Prehistoric Astronomical Sites in Scotland,” Transactions of the Royal Philosophical Society London. A. 276, 169–194.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • MacKie, E.W. 1976. “The Glasgow Conference on Ceremonial and Science in Prehistoric Britain,” Antiquities 50, 136–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKie, E.W. 1977a. Science and Society in Prehistoric Britain. (New York: St. Martin’s Press). (Reviews by D.C. Heggie: Journal for the History of Astronomy 9, 61, 1978; S. Piggott: Antiquity 52, 62, 1979; S.L. Gibbs: Archaeoastronomy 2(2), 21–22; S. Milisauskas: American Anthropologist 82, 882).

    Google Scholar 

  • Makemson, M.W. 1941. The Morning Star Rises: An Account of Polynesian Astronomy. (New Haven: Yale University Press). (Review by G. Wendt: Sky and Telescope 1(3), 20).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshack, A. 1972b. The Roots of Civilization: The Cognitive Beginnings of Man’s First Art, Symbol and Notation. (New York: McGraw-Hill). 413 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavor, J.W., Jr. 1977. “The Riddle of Mazorah,” Almogaren VII, 1976, Yearbook of the Institutum Canarium and the Gesellschaft für interdisziplinäre Saharaforschung Hallein, Austria (Graz: Akademische Druck und Verlaganstalt), 89–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohen, J.P. 1990. The World of Megaliths. (New York, NY: Facts on File).

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, R. 1970. Der Himmel über dem Menschen der Steinzeit, Astronomie und Mathematik in den Bauten der Megalithkultur. (Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newall, R.S. 1953/1959/1981. Stonehenge, Wiltshire. Department of the Environment Official Handbook. (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newham, C.A. 1972. The Astronomical Significance of Stonehenge. (Gwent, Wales: Moon Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Kelly, M.J. 1982. Newgrange: Archaeology, Art and Legend. (London: Thames & Hudson). 240 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Kelly, M.J. 1989. Early Ireland: An Introduction to Irish Prehistory. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovenden, M.W., and Rodger, D. 1978. “Megaliths and Medicine Wheels,” in M. Wilson, et al., eds. 1978: Megaliths to Medicine Wheels: Boulder Structures in Archaeology (Proceedings, Eleventh Chacmool Conference, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta), 371–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parpola, A. 1994. Deciphering the Indus Script. (Cambridge: University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, J.D. 1974a. “Investigation into the Astronomical and Geometric Characteristics of the Passage-Grave Cemeteries at the Boyne Valley, Carrowkeel and Loughcrew.” M.Sc. Thesis. (Dublin: University of Dublin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponting, G.H., and Ponting, M.R. 1984a. New Light on the Stones of Callanish. (Stornoway: Essprint, Ltd.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, F.T. 1991a. An Investigation of the Great Standing Stones at Newgrange for Solar Calendar Function. M.Sc. Thesis (Dublin: University of Dublin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappenglück, M. 1997. “The Pleiades in the ‘Salle des Taureaux’, Grotte des Lascaux (France). Does a Rock Picture in the Cave of Lascaux Show the Open Star Cluster of the Pleiades at the Magdalénien Era, ca. 15,300 b.c.?” in Actas del IV Congreso de la SEAC, Proceedings of the IVth SEAC Meeting, ‘Astronomy and Culture’, C. Jaschek and F. Atrio Barandela, eds. (Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca), 217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappenglück, M. 1999. “Sky Luminaries in the Space Orienting Activity of Homo Sapiens in the Middle Palaeolithic,” Astronomical and Astrophysical Transactions 17, 459–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappenglück, M. 2000. “Ice Age People Find their Ways by the Stars: A Rock Picture in the Cueva de El Castillo (Spain) May Represent the Circumpolar Constellation of the Northern Crown (CrB),” Migration and Diffusion 1(2), 25–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea, T. 1988. “The Winter Solstice Phenomenon at Newgrange: Accident or Design?” Nature 337, 343–345.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.H. 1983. “The Solstice Eclipses of Stonehenge II,” Archaeoastronomy 6, 124–131.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles, C.L.N. 1981. “Prehistoric Astronomy: How Far Did It Go?” New Scientist 90, 750.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles, C.L.N. 1984a. “Megalithic Astronomy: The Last Five Years,” Vistas in Astronomy 27, 231–289.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles, C.L.N. 1985. “The Linear Settings of Argyll and Mull,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 16, Archaeoastronomy Suppl. (9), S105–S132.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles, C.L.N., ed. 1988a. Records in Stone: Papers in Memory of Alexander Thom. (Cambridge: University Press). 519 pp. (Review by S. McCluskey: Isis 81, 330–331, 1990.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, B.E. 1986. “Atmospheric Extinction Effects on Stellar Alignments,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 17, Archaeoastronomy Suppl. (10), S32–S42.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Serio, G.F., Hoskin, M., and Ventura, F. 1992. “The Orientations of the Temples at Malta,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 23, 107–119.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, B. 1912b. “Astronomical Indications in the Megalithic Monuments at Callanish,” Journal of the British Astronomical Association 23, 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stooke, P.J. 1994. “Neolithic Lunar Maps at Knowth and Baltinglass, Ireland,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 25, 39–55.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sweetman, P.D. 1984. “A Late Neolithic/Early Bronze Age Pit Circle at Newgrange, Co. Meath,” Proceedings, R. Ir. Academy 85C, 195–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, A. 1964. “The Larger Units of Length of Megalithic Man,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A127, 527–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, A. 1966. “Megalithic Astronomy: Indications in Standing Stones,” Vistas in Astronomy 7, 1–57.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Thom, A. 1967. Megalithic Sites in Britain. (Oxford: Clarendon Press). Reprinted 1972, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, A. 1971/1978. Megalithic Lunar Observatories. (Oxford: University Press). (3rd printing, 1978). (Review by T.M. Cowan: Journal of the History of Astronomy 2, 202, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, A. 1984. “Moving and Erecting the Menhirs,” Proceedings, Prehistoric Society 50, 382–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, A., and Thom, A.S. 1971. “The Astronomical Significance of Large Carnac Menhirs,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 2, 147–160.

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Thom, A., and Thom, A.S. 1973. “A Megalithic Lunar Observatory in Orkney: The Ring of Brogar and Its Cairns,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 4, 111–123.

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Thom, A., and Thom, A.S. 1974. “The Kermario Alignments,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 5, 30­–47.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Thom, A., and Thom, A.S. 1978a. Megalithic Remains in Britain and Brittany. (Oxford: University Press). (Reviews by R.J.C. Atkinson: Journal for the History of Astronomy 10, Archaeoastronomy Suppl. (1), S99–S102; G.S. Hawkins: Archaeoastronomy 2(4), 27–28, 1979.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, A., Thom, A.S., Merritt, R.L., and Merritt, L.M. 1973. “The Astronomical Significance of the Crucuno Stone Rectangle,” Current Anthropology 14, 450–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tusa, S., Serio, G.F., and Hoskin, M. 1992. “Orientations of the Sesi of Pantelleria.” Archaeoastronomy-Supplement to the Journal for the History of Astronomy 17, S15.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Twohig, E.S. 1981. The Megalithic Art of Western Europe. (Oxford: Clarendon Press). (Review by G. Daniel: Antiquity 55, 234.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventura, F., Serio, G.F., and Hoskin, M. 1993. “Possible Tally Stones at Mnajdra, Malta,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 24, 171–183.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, D. 1993. “Medicine Wheel Astronomy,” in Astronomies in Cultures, eds., Ruggles and N.J. Saunders. (Niwot, Colorado: University of Colorado Press). 163–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J.E. 1978. Sun, Moon, and Standing Stones. (Oxford: University Press). (Reviews by R.J.C. Atkinson: Antiquity 52, 251, 1978; E.W. MacKie: Nature 275, 75, 1978; J.A. Eddy: Journal for the History of Astronomy 11, Archaeoastronomy Suppl., (2), S95; L.V. Morrison: Observatory 100, 173, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David H. Kelley .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kelley, D.H., Milone, E.F. (2011). Paleolithic and Neolithic Cultures. In: Exploring Ancient Skies. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7624-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7624-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7623-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7624-6

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics