Skip to main content

An Empirical Examination of the Role of Environmental Accounting Information in Environmental Investment Decision-Making

  • Chapter
Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production

Part of the book series: Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science ((ECOE,volume 24))

Abstract

An experiment is used to investigate two important factors associated with environmental investment decision-making by managers: the regulatory regime in which the firm operates and the nature of environmental information used as a decision aid. Two regulatory regimes are examined, a command and control regulatory regime and a voluntary self-regulatory regime. Two accounting systems are contrasted, environmental management accounting and conventional management accounting, thereby providing a 2 × 2 experimental design for the empirical study. The paper considers environmental investment decision-making by different types of managers working in the Australian offshore petroleum industry. These empirical results indicate that environmental accounting information has a more significant influence on the willingness of managers to incorporate environmental considerations into investment decisions and to avoid future environmental risks, than does the type of regulatory regime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes, K. E. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 29(5,6) 447–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AMSA (Australian Maritime Safety Authority). (2005). Major oil pills in Australia. Retrieved October 27, 2005, from http://www.amsa.gov.au

  • APPEA (Australian Petroleum Production & Exploration Association). (1999). Senate environment, communications, information technology and the arts references committee inquiry into global warming. Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • APPEA (Australian Petroleum Production & Exploration Association). (2003). Greenhouse response strategy: Commitments of the upstream oil and gas industry. Canberra: APPEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • APPEA (Australian Petroleum Production & Exploration Association). (2004). The Australian petroleum exploration and production industry key statistics. Canberra: APPEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australia and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC). (1998). Towards sustainability: Achieving cleaner production in Australia. 16th Meeting: Hobart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (1994). Capital-budgeting systems and capabilities investments in the U.S. companies after the Second World War. Business History Review, 68, 73–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benidickson, J., Doren, G. B., & Olewiler, N. (1992). Greening the green light: Environmental regulation and investment in Canada. Toronto: McGraw-Hill, Ryerson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, R., & Braithwaite, V. (1997). A social values segmentation of the potential ecotourism market. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 5(1), 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromiley, P. (1986). Corporate planning and capital investment. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 7(2), 147–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burritt, R. L. (2004). Environmental management accounting: Roadblocks on the way to the green and pleasant land. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(1), 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carliss, B. Y, & Clark, K. B. (1994). Capital-budgeting systems and capabilities investments in U.S. companies after Second World War. Business History Review, 68(1), 73–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, V. H., & O’Neill, R. V. (1999). Tools to characterise the environmental setting. In V.H. Dale, & M. R. English. Tools to aid environmental decision making (pp. 62–90). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Earnhart, D. (2004). Regulatory factors shaping environmental performance at publicly-owned treatment plants. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48(1), 655–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Zbaracki, M. J. (1992). Strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, M. A. (2004). Corporate environmentalism, regulatory reform, and industry self-regulation: Toward genuine regulatory reinvention in the United States. Governance, 17(2), 145—167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1999). The triple bottom line: implications for the oil industry. Oil & Gas Journal, 97(50), 139–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayers, C. (1999). Environment and investment: The role of personal investment choice in creating sustainability. Sustainable Development, 7, 64–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell, G. E., & Lo, C. W. H. (2003). The influence of knowledge and values on managerial behaviours on behalf of environment: an empirical examination of managers in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(1), 45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N., & Rees, J. (1997). Industry self-regulation: An institutional perspective. Law and Policy, 19(9), 365–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N., & Johnstone, R. (1999). Regulating workplace safety systems and sanctions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. (1997). Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFAC. (2004). International guidelines on environmental management accounting, exposure draft. New York: International Federation of Accountants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, S., Krishnan, R., & Lave, L. (2001). Estimating the hidden costs of environmental regulation. The Accounting Review, 76(2), 171–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Latham, G. P. (1986). Participation in decision-making: When should it be used? Organisational Dynamics, 16, 65–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, M. J., & Chan, C. C. (1999). Narrative corporate social disclosure: how much of a difference do they make to investment decision-making? British Accounting Review, 31(4), 439–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, M. J., & Patten, D. M. (2002). Securing organisational legitimacy: An experimental decision case examining the impact of environmental disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. 15(3), 372–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad, A., & Arnold, W. (1987). An examination of the effects of experience and task complexity on audit judgments. The Accounting Review, 62(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness, K. E., & Mirza, A. M. (1991). Corporate social disclosure: A note on a test of agency theory. British Accounting Review, 23(3), 211–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan, G. (2002). Environmental disclosure in the annual report: extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3), 344–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, A. (2003). The message and methods of ethical investment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11, 683–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, M. F. (2000). Environmental management accounting (EMA): Putting the right numbers in sustainable projects. Environmental management accounting network—Asia Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarker, T. K., & Burritt, R. L. (2005). Does self-regulation improve corporate ecological-efficiency? An empirical investigation into the Australian Petroleum Industry from 1996 to 2002. APPEA Journal, 45(1), 511–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, A., & Harvey, B. (2000). Environmental knowledge and the adoption of ready made environmental management solutions. Eco-Management and Auditing, 7, 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. L. (2000). Contemporary environmental accounting: Issues, concepts and practices. Sheffield: Greenleaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. W. (1995). Institutions and organisations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, K., Stoughton, A., Graff, R., & Feng, L., (2000). Healthy hospitals: environmental improvements through environmental accounting. Boston: Tellus Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organisational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 681–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. R., & Haka, S. F. (2000). Effects of information load on capital budgeting decisions. Behavioural Research in Accounting, 12, 171–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. (1995). Regulating pollution under asymmetric information: The case of industrial wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(3), 357–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tippet, J., & Leung, P. (2001). Defining ethical investment and its demography in Australia. Australian Accounting Review, 11(3), 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trotman, K. (1996). Research methods for judgment and decision making studies in auditing. Melbourne: Coopers & Lybrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelwright, S. C. (1986). Facilities planning: Reflecting corporate strategy in manufacturing decisions. In M. Kaufman (Ed.). The capital budgeting handbook. Homewood: Dow Jones-Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmshurst, T. D., & Frost, G. F. (2001). The role of accounting and the accountant in the environmental management system. Business Strategy and the Environment. 10(3), 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yishai, Y. (1998). The guardian state: a comparative analysis of interest group regulation. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 11(2), 153–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. D. (1992). Sustainable investment and resource use: Equity, environmental integrity and economic efficiency. Carnforth: Parthenon Press and Paris, UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tapan K. Sarker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sarker, T.K., Burritt, R.L. (2008). An Empirical Examination of the Role of Environmental Accounting Information in Environmental Investment Decision-Making. In: Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Burritt, R.L., Jasch, C. (eds) Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8913-8_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics