Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications ((NOIA,volume 82))

Summary

We show how to optimize the shape of the transfer function of a linear time invariant (LTI) single-input-single-output (SISO) system. Since any transfer function is rational, this can be formulated as an optimization problem for the coefficients of polynomials. After characterizing the cone of polynomials which are nonnegative on intervals, we formulate this problem using semidefinite programming (SDP), which can be solved efficiently. This work extends prior results for discrete LTI SISO systems to continuous LTI SISO systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. Alkire and L. Vandenberghe, Convex optimization problems involving finite autocorrelation sequences. Mathematical Programming Series A 93 (2002), 331–359.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Frank M. Callier, Charles A. Desoer, Linear System Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Faybusovich, On Nesterov’s approach to semi-infinite programming, Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 74 (2002), 195–215.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Genin, Y. Hachez, Yu. Nesterov, P. Van Dooren, “Convex Optimization over Positive Polynomials and filter design”, Proceedings UKACC Int. Conf. Control 2000, page SS41, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Genin, Y. Hachez, Yu. Nesterov, P. Van Dooren, Optimization problems over positive pseudopolynomial matrices, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 25 (2003), 57–79.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Kailath and A.H. Sayed, “Displacement Structure: theory and applications”, SIAM Rev. 37 (1995), 297–386.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Lukacs, “Verscharfung der ersten Mittelwersatzes der Integralrechnung für rationale Polynome”, Math. Zeitschrift, 2, 229–305, 1918.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. A.A. Markov, “Lecture notes on functions with the least deviation from zero”, 1906. Reprinted in Markov A.A. Selected Papers (ed. N. Achiezer), GosTechIzdat, 244–291, 1948, Moscow(in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yu. Nesterov and A. Nemirovsky, “interior-point polynomial algorithms in convex programming”, SIAM Studies in Applied Mathematics, vol. 13, Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics(SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yu. Nesterov, “Squared functional systems and optimization problems”, High Performance Optimization (H. Frenk et al., eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000, pp.405–440.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Polak, “Optimization: Algorithms and Consistent Approximations”. Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 124, Springer, New York, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Pólya and G. Szegö, Problems and Theorems in Analysis II, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. Powers and B. Reznick, “Polynomials That are Positive on an Interval”, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 352, No. 10, pp. 4677–4692, 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. S.-P. Wu, S. Boyd, and L. Vandenberghe, “FIR filter design via spectral factorization and convex optimization”, Applied and Computational Control, Signals and Circuits, B. Datta, ed., Birkhäuser, 1997, ch.2, pp.51–81.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P.A. Parrilo. Semidefinite Programming relaxations for semialgebraic problems. Math. Prog., No. 2, Ser. B, 293–320, 96 (2003).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. J.F. Sturm, “SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones”, Optimization Methods and Software, 11&12 (1999) 625–653.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. L. Vandenberghe and S. Boyd, “Semidefinite Programming”, SIAM Review, 38(1):49–95, 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nie, J., Demmel, J.W. (2006). Shape Optimization of Transfer Functions. In: Hager, W.W., Huang, SJ., Pardalos, P.M., Prokopyev, O.A. (eds) Multiscale Optimization Methods and Applications. Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications, vol 82. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29550-X_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics