Abstract
This paper examines the dynamics of thought-language interactions within the organisational context of business. Based on an assessment of the cognition-voice debate within the cognitive sciences and related areas of philosophical enquiry, the paper proposes that thought and language are distinct systems. This notion of modularity is developed into a framework within which the two systems interact and, in doing so, influence and shape each other. These interactions form multiple thought and voiced drafts, reflecting the ‘multiple drafts’ model developed by Daniel Dennett to examine the phenomenon of consciousness. The drafting and re-drafting of thought and language are analysed via critical consideration of two transcripts of interviews with owner-managers. The overall theoretical approach suggests that the dynamics of voice-cognition drafting offer insights into: the development of expert cognitive frameworks; patterns in group development — in particular the emergence of shared values and concepts within the business; and processes of experiential learning within organizations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology (A Reber New York Penguin Reference) defines cognition as ‘A broad term which has been traditionally used to refer to such activities as thinking, conceiving, reasoning, etc. Most psychologists have used it to refer to any class of mental behaviour (using that term very loosely) where the underlying characteristics are of an abstract nature...’
T Das and B Teng ‘Cognitive Biases and Strategic Decision Processes: An Integrative Perspective’ Journal of Management Studies (1999) pp 757-778; C Schwenk ‘The Cognitive Perspective on Strategic Decision Making’ Journal of Management Studies 25, 1 (1988) pp 41-55; H Simon Models of Man New York, Riley 1957l; C Stubbart ‘Managerial Cognition: A Missing Link in Strategic Management Research’ Journal of Management Studies 26, 4 (1989) pp 325-347
D Grant, T Keenoy and C Oswick ‘Introduction of Diversity, Dichotomy and Multi-disciplinarity’ in: Grant, Keenoy and Oswick (eds) Discourse and Organization pp 7–13 London, Sage 1998; M Foucault The Archaeology of Knowledge London, Routledge 1974
B Czarniawska Narrating the Organization: Dramas of Institutional Identity (New Practices of Enquiry) Chicago, University of Chicago Press 1997
Y Gabriel Storytelling in Organizations: Facts, Fictions, and Fantasies Oxford, Oxford University Press 2000
K Weick Sensemaking in Organisations Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications 1995
P Cossette ‘The Study of Language in Organizations: A Symbolic Interactionist Stance’ Human Relations 51, 11 (1998) pp 1355–1377
J Anderson Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications New York, Worth 2000
S Pinker The Language Instinct London, Penguin Books 1994
S Pinker ‘Rules of Language’ in: P Thagard (ed) Mind Readings: Introductory Selections on Cognitive Science Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press 1998
R Stalnaker Context and Content Oxford, Oxford University Press, Oxford Cognitive Science Series 1999
A Gibb ‘Small Firms Training and Competitiveness: Building upon the Small Business as a Learning Organisation’ International Small Business Journal 15, 3 (1997) pp 3–12; R Scase and R Goffee The Real World of the Small Business Owner London, Croom Helm 1980; E Wright Class, Crisis, The State London, Verso 1978
Scase and Goffee 1980
D Dennett Consciousness Explained London, Penguin Science 1993
Anderson op cit 2000
S Smith, H Brown, J Toman, and L Goodman ‘The Lack of Cerebral Effects of d-Tubercurarine’ Anesthesiology, 8 (1947) pp 1–14
B Whorf Language, Thought, and Reality Cambridge, MIT Press 1956. A passage in which Whorf outlines this proposition (taken from Pinker, 1994) is as follows: ‘We dissect nature along lines laid down by our native languages. The categories and types that we isolate from the world of phenomena we do not find there because they stare every observer in the face; on the contrary, the world is presented in a kaleidoscope flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds. We cut nature up, organize it into concepts, and ascribe significances as we do, largely because we are parties to an agreement to organize it in this way - an agreement that holds throughout our speech community and is codified in the patterns of language. The agreement is, of course, an implicit and unstated one, but its terms are absolutely obligatory; we cannot talk at all except by subscribing to the organization and classification of data which the agreement decrees.'
L Martin ‘Eskimo Words for Snow: A Case Study in the Genesis and Decay of an Anthropological Example’ American Anthropologist 88, 41 (1986) pp 8–423
E Heider ‘Universals of Color Naming and Memory’ Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1972) pp 10–20; E Rosch 1977 ‘Human Categorization’ in N Warren (ed) Advances in Cross-cultural Psychology London, Academic Press; E Rosch ‘Principles of categorization’ in: E Rosch and B Lloyd (eds) Cognition and Categorization Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum 1978
G Pullum The Great Eskimo Hoax and Other Irreverent Essays on the Study of Language Chicago, Chicago University Press 1991
Martin op cit 1986; Pullum op cit 1991; Pinker op cit 1994
Pinker op cit 1994
Stalnaker op cit 1999
‘It is intuitively natural to think of speech as the expression of thought, and to assume that the utterances and inscriptions produced in using language derive their content from beliefs and intentions of the speakers who produce them.’ Stalnaker op cit 1999
Anderson op cit 2000
Smith et al op cit 1947
Pinker op cit 1994
J Fodor 1983 The Modularity of Mind Cambridge, MA, MIT/Bradford Books
Pinker op cit 1994
N Chomsky Aspects of the Theory of Syntax Cambridge MA, MIT Press 1965; N Chomsky Rules and Representations New York, Columbia University Press 1980
Pinker op cit 1994
J Fodor Review of the ‘The Modularity of Mind’ Behavioural and Brain Sciences 8 (1985) pp 1–42
Anderson op cit 2000
C Eliasmith ‘The Third Contender: A Critical Examination of the Dynamicist Theory of Cognition’ Philosophical Psychology 9, 44 (1996) pp 14–63
Dennett op cit 1993
Dennett op cit p 111
A Reber Penguin Dictionary of Psychology London Penguin Books 1995
Dennett op cit 1993 pp 76-77 and 333-335
Dennett op cit 1993
Dennett op cit 1993
Pinker 1994
M Laukkanen ‘Comparative Cause Mapping of Organizational Cognitions’ in: Meindl et al (eds) Cognition Within and Between Organizations Thousand Oaks, IL, Sage Publications 1996
P Hannon and A Atherton ‘Small Firm Success and the Art of Orienteering: the Value of Plans, Planning and Strategic Awareness in the Competitive Small Business’ Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 5, 2 (1998) pp 102–119
Schwenk op cit 1988
R Gooding and A Kinicki ‘Interpreting Event Causes: the Complementary Role of Categorisation and Attribution Processes’ Journal of Management Studies 32, 1 (1995) pp 1–22
M Carrithers Why Humans Have Cultures Oxford, Oxford University Press 1992; D Dennett The Intentional Stance Cambridge MA, MIT Press 1987
Carrithers op cit 1992
A Tversky and D Kahneman ‘Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’ Science 185 (1974) pp 1124–1131
Simon op cit 1957
Dennett op cit 1987
Reber op cit 1995
A Lurigio and J Carroll ‘Probation Officers’ Schemata of Offenders: Content, Development and Impact on Treatment Decisions’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48 (1985) pp 1112–1126
D Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development Englewood Cliffs NJ, Prentice Hall 1984
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atherton, A. Saying What You Mean and Meaning What You Say: Relating Cognition and Voice in Business. Philos. of Manag. 3, 55–66 (2003). https://doi.org/10.5840/pom2003336
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/pom2003336