Skip to main content
Log in

Theoretical comparison of the energy conversion efficiencies of electrostatic energy harvesters

  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The characteristics of a new type of electrostatic energy harvesting device, called an out-of-plane overlap harvester, are analyzed for the first time. This device utilizes a movable part that vibrates up and down on the surface of a wafer and a changing overlapping area between the vertical comb fingers. This operational principle enables the minimum capacitance to be close to 0 and significantly increases the energy conversion efficiency per unit volume. The characteristics of the out-of-plane overlap harvester, an in-plane gap-closing harvester, and an in-plane overlap harvester are compared in terms of the length, height, and width of the comb finger and the parasitic capacitance. The efficiency is improved as the length or the height increases and as the width or the parasitic capacitance decreases. In every case, the out-of-plane overlap harvester is able to create more energy and is, thus, preferable over other designs. It is also free from collisions between two electrodes caused by random vibration amplitudes and creates more energy from offaxis perturbations. This device, given its small feature size, is expected to provide more energy to various types of wireless electronics devices and to offer high compatibility with other integrated circuits and ease of embedment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Roundy, P. K. Wright and J. Rabaey, Comput. Commun. 26, 1131 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. P. Beeby, M. J. Tudor and N. M. White, Meas. Sci. Technol. 17, R175 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Roundy, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 16, 809 (2005).

  4. R. J. M. Vullers, R. van Schaijk, I. Doms, C. Van Hoof and R. Mertens, Solid-State Electron. 53, 684 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. H. B. Fang, J. Q. Liu, Z. Y. Xu, L. Dong, L. Wang, D. Chen, B. C. Cai and Y. Liu, Microelectron. J. 37, 1280 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. E. K. Reilly and P. K. Wright, J. Micromech. Microeng. 19, 095014 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. R. B. Yates and C. Shearwood, Electron. Lett. 33, 1883 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Harb, Renew. Energ. 36, 2641 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Lee, Y. M. Lim, B. Yang, R.K. Kotlanka, C. H. Heng, J. H. He, M. Tang, J. Xie and H. Feng, Sensor. Actuat. A - Phys. 156, 208 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. L. Mateu and F. Moll, Proc. SPIE Microtechnologies New Millenn. (Sevilla, Spain, May 9-11, 2005), p. 359.

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. S. Hudak and G. G. Amatucci, J. Appl. Phys. 103, 1 (2008).

  12. S. Boisseau, G. Despesse and B. A. Seddik, Small-Scale Energy Harvesting, edited by M. Lallart (InTech, Rijeka, 2012), Chap. 5, p. 105.

  13. B. Hwang, J. Lim and C. K. Kim, Proc. Int. Conf. Manuf. Technol. Eng. (Seoul, Korea, October 18-19, 2012), p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Ha, O. Kwon, J. Kim, J. Oh and T. Won, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 42, S676 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang-Kyu Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, CK. Theoretical comparison of the energy conversion efficiencies of electrostatic energy harvesters. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 70, 292–299 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.70.292

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.70.292

Keywords

Navigation