Skip to main content
Log in

Verification of the grid size and angular increment effects in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy using the dynamic conformal arc technique

  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dosimetric effects of variable grid size and angular increment were systematically evaluated in the measured dose distributions of dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Dose variations with different grid sizes (2, 3, and 4 mm) and angular increments (2, 4, 6, and 10°) for spherical planning target volumes (PTVs) were verified in a thorax phantom by using EBT2 films. Although the doses for identical PTVs were predicted for the different grid sizes, the dose discrepancy was evaluated using one measured dose distribution with the gamma tool because the beam was delivered in the same set-up for DCAT. The dosimetric effect of the angular increment was verified by comparing the measured dose area histograms of organs at risk (OARs) at each angular increment. When the difference in the OAR doses is higher than the uncertainty of the film dosimetry, the error is regarded as the angular increment effect in discretely calculated doses. In the results, even when a 2-mm grid size was used with an elaborate dose calculation, 4-mm grid size led to a higher gamma pass ratio due to underdosage, a steep-dose descent gradient, and lower estimated PTV doses caused by the smoothing effect in the calculated dose distribution. An undulating dose distribution and a difference in the maximum contralateral lung dose of up to 14% were observed in dose calculation using a 10° angular increment. The DCAT can be effectively applied for an approximately spherical PTV in a relatively uniform geometry, which is less affected by inhomogeneous materials and differences in the beam path length.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Y. Jin, N. Wen, L. Ren, C. Glide-Hurst and I. J. Chetty, Cancer J. 17, 3 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Malatesta, V. Landoni, S. delle Canne, A. Bufacchi, L. Marmiroli, O. Caspiani, A. Bonanni, F. Tortoreto, M. V. Leone, R. Capparella, R. Fragomeni and L. Begnozzi, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 4, 3 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Ding, F. Newman, B. D. Kavanagh, K. Stuhr, T. K. Johnson and L. E. Gaspar, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 66, 4 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. A. Morales-Paliza, C. W. Coffey and G. X. Ding, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 12, 2 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. G. Wiggenraad, A. L. Petoukhova, L. Versluis and J. P. van Santvoort, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 74, 4 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. M. Matuszak, D. Yan, I. Grills and A. Martinez, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 77, 2 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Gevaert, B. Engels, C. Garibaldi, D. Verellen, P. Deconinck, M. Duchateau, T. Reynders, K. Tournel and M. De Ridder, Radiat. Oncol. 7, 120 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Koto, Y. Takai, Y. Ogawa, H. Matsushita, K. Takeda, C. Takahashi, K. R. Britton, K. Jingu, K. Takai, M. Mitsuya, K. Nemoto and S. Yamada, Radiat. Oncol. 85, 3 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Niemierko and M. Goitein, Med. Phys. 16, 2 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Chung, H. Jin, J Palta, T. S. Suh and S. Kim, Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 19 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. G. M. Videtic, A. K. Signh, J. Y. Chang, Q. T. Le, W. Parker, K. R. Oliver, S. E. Schild and H. Chen, RTOG 0915 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  12. International Specialty Products, http://online1.ispcorp.com/layouts/Gafchromic/index.html/EBT2whitepaper.pdf (2009).

  13. C. M. Bragg, K. Wingate and J. Conway, Radiat. Oncol. 86, 2 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. S. Ronde and L. Hoffmann, Acta. Oncol. 48, 2 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Y. Park, J. W. Lee, K. S. Choi, J. S. Lee, Y. H. Kim, S. Hong and T. S. Suh, Med. Phys. 38, 12 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. M. Moran, J. Radawski and B. A. Fraass, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 6, 2 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. G. Clark, C. Candish, E. Vollans, E. Gete, R. Lee, M. Martin, R. Ma and M. McKenzie, Med. Dosim. 33, 3 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S. D. McGrath, M. M. Matuszak, D. Yan, L. L. Kestin, A. A. Martinez and I. S. Grills, Radiother. Oncol. 95, 2 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Schwartz, J. Van der Geer, M. Van Herk, J. V. Lebesque, B. J. Mijnheer and E. M. Damen, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 65, 4 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Taylor, L. Dunn, T. Kron, F. Height and R. Franich, Med. Dosim. 37, 1 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Ong, W. F. Verbakel, J. P. Cuijpers, B. J. Slotman and S. Senan, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 79, 1 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Ronde and L. Hoffmann, Acta. Oncol. 48, 2 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. E. Sterpin, M. Tomsej, B. De Smedt, N. Reynaert and S. Vynckier, Med. Phys. 34, 5 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. N. Papanikolaou, J. J. Battista, A. L. Boyer, C. Kappas, E. Klein, T. R. Mackie, M. Sharpe and J. V. Dyk, AAPM REPORT No. 85, 1 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Seppala, S. Suilamo, J. Kulmala, P. Mali and H. Minn, Radiat. Oncol. 7, 1 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. S. F. Kry, P. Alvarez, A. Molineu, C. Amador, J. Galvin and D. S. Followill, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 85, 1 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. B. D. Kavanagh, M. Ding, T. E. Schefter, K. Stuhr and F. A. Newman, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 7, 2 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tae-Suk Suh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, HJ., Suh, TS., Park, JY. et al. Verification of the grid size and angular increment effects in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy using the dynamic conformal arc technique. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 62, 1672–1677 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.62.1672

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.62.1672

Keywords

Navigation