Abstract
The general aim of this study is to validate the cognitive relevance of the geometric model used in the semantic atlases (SA). With this goal in mind, we compare the results obtained by the automatic contexonym organizing model (ACOM)—an SA-derived model for word sense representation based on contextual links—with human subjects’ responses on a word association task. We begin by positioning the geometric paradigm with respect to the hierarchical paradigm (WordNet) and the vector paradigm (latent semantic analysis [LSA] and the hyperspace analogue to language model). Then we compare ACOM’s responses with Hirsh and Tree’s (2001) word association norms based on the responses of two groups of subjects. The results showed that words associated by 50% or more of the Hirsh and Tree subjects were also proposed by ACOM (e.g., 71% of the words in the norms were also given by ACOM). Finally, we compare ACOM and LSA on the basis of the same association norms. The results indicate better performance for the geometric model.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benzécri, J.-P. (1980). L’analyse des données: L’analyse des correspondances. Paris: Bordas.
Burgess, C., & Lund, K. (1997). Modelling parsing constraints with high-dimensional context space. Language & Cognitive Processes, 12, 177–210.
Collins, A., & Loftus, E. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic memory. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.
Collins, A., & Quillian, M. (1969). Does category size affect categorization time? Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 8, 240–248.
Fellbaum, C. (Ed.) (1998). WordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Forde, E. M. E., & Humphreys, G. W. (Eds.) (2002). Category specificity in brain and mind. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual spaces: The geometry of thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2003). Prediction and semantic association. In S. Becker, S. Thrun, & K. Obermayer (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 15 (pp. 11–18). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hirsh, C., & Tree, J. (2001). Word association norms for two cohorts of British adults. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 14, 1–44.
Ji, H., Ploux, S., & Wehrli, E. (2003). Lexical knowledge representation with contexonyms. In Proceedings of the 9th Machine Translation Summit (pp. 194-201).
Kintsch, W. (2001). Predication. Cognitive Science, 25, 173–202.
Laham, D. (1997). Latent semantic analysis approaches to categorization. In M.-G. Shafto & P. Langley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (2007). Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 203–208.
The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (1999). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ploux, S. (1997). Modélisation et traitement informatique de la synonymie. Linguisticae Investigationes, 21, 1–28.
Ploux, S., & Victorri, B. (1998). Construction d’espaces sémantiques à l’aide de dictionnaires informatisés des synonymes. Traitement Automatique des Langues, 39, 161–182.
Pottier, B. (1992). Sémantique générale. Paris: PUF.
Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J., & Smith, E. E. (1973). Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 81, 1–20.
Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., & Rips, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review, 81, 214–241.
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D., Lewis, W., & Garrett, M. (2004). Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic system hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 422–488.
Widdows, D., & Higgins, M. (2004). Geometric ordering of concepts, logical disjunction, and learning by induction. In S. D. Levy & R. Gayler (Eds.), Compositional connectionism in cognitive science (AAAI Fall Symposium Series). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the Ministry of Information and Communication, Korea, under the Information Technology Research Center support program supervised by the Institute of Information Technology Assessment [IITA-2007-(C1090-0603-0046)].
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ji, H., Lemaire, B., Choo, H. et al. Testing the cognitive relevance of a geometric model on a word association task: A comparison of humans, ACOM, and LSA. Behavior Research Methods 40, 926–934 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.4.926
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.4.926