Abstract
In two experiments, we explored the role of foreknowledge on visual search for targets defined along the size continuum. Targets were of large, medium, or small size and of high or low similarity relative to the distractors. In Experiment 1, we compared search for known and unknown singleton feature targets as a function of their size and similarity to the distractors. When distractor similarity was high, target foreknowledge benefited targets at the end of the size continuum (i.e., large and small) relatively more than targets of medium size. In Experiment 2, participants were given foreknowledge of what the target was not. The beneficial effect of foreknowledge for endpoint targets was reduced. The data indicate the role of top-down templates in search, which can be “tuned” more effectively for targets at the ends of feature dimensions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauer, B., Jolicoeur, P. &Cowan, W. B. (1996a). Distractor heterogeneity versus linear separability in colour visual search.Perception,25, 1281–1294.
Bauer, B., Jolicoeur, P. &Cowan, W. B. (1996b). Visual search for colour targets that are or are not linearly separable from distractors.Vision Research,36, 1439–1465.
Bauer, B., Jolicoeur, P. &Cowan, W. B. (1998). The linear separability effect in color visual search: Ruling out the additive color hypothesis.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 1083–1093.
Braun, J. (1994). Visual search among items of different salience: Removal of visual attention mimics a lesion of extrastriate area V4.Journal of Neuroscience,14, 554–567.
Bravo, M. J. &Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 465–472.
Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention.Psychological Review,97, 523–547.
Chelazzi, L., Miller, E. K., Duncan, J. &Desimone, R. (1993). A neural basis for visual search in the inferior temporal cortex.Nature,363, 345–347.
Duncan, J. &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
D’Zmura, M. (1991). Color in visual search.Vision Research,31, 951–966.
Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Repetition effects in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 800–817.
Hodsoll, J. [P.], & Humphreys, G. W. (2001). Driving attention with the top down: The relative contribution of target templates to the linear separability effect in the size dimension.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 918–926.
Hodsoll, J. P. &Humphreys, G. W. (2005). The effect of target foreknowledge on visual search for categorically separable orientation targets.Vision Research,45, 2346–2351.
Kristjansson, A., Wang, D. &Nakayama, K. (2002). The role of priming in conjunctive visual search.Cognition,85, 37–52.
Macquistan, A. D. (1994). Heterogeneity effects in visual search predicted from the group scanning model.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,48, 495–515.
Maljkovic, V. &Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features.Memory & Cognition,22, 657–672.
Maljkovic, V. &Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 977–991.
Treisman, A. &Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 459–478.
Van Selst, M. &Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 631–650.
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 202–238.
Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.),Attention (pp. 13–73). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Wolfe, J. M. &Bose, M. (1991).Visual search for the “medium” Stimulus. Unpublished research report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C. &Hyle, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contribution of bottom-up and top-down guidance in visual search for feature singletons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 483–502.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by grants from the EPSRC, BBSRC, and MRC to G.W.H. and by grants from the ESRC and British Academy to J.J.B.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hodsoll, J.P., Humphreys, G.W. & Braithwaite, J.J. Dissociating the effects of similarity, salience, and top-down processes in search for linearly separable size targets. Perception & Psychophysics 68, 558–570 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208758
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208758