Abstract
Three-dimensional (3-D) variants of the Müller-Lyer pattern were created to address the question of where along the path of information flow in the visual system the illusion might occur. These variants, which yielded a robust illusion, included dihedral angles in place of the arrow-heads of the classical pattern. The enormous difference in the shape of the resulting retinal image, compared with that of the classical pattern, makes it difficult to explain the present illusion by resorting to image-processing theories such as selective filtering (Ginsburg, 1984,1986) or depth processing (Gregory, 1963, 1966, 1968). It was also shown that this 3-D illusion is homologous with the classical illusion, and that the two may thus share a common causal mechanism. A new type of 3-D figure, which yielded the same retinal image as did the classical pattern, was then employed. However, since the figure was 3-D, its shape in spatial coordinates was very different compared to that of the classical pattern. The magnitude of the illusion obtained with this figure was half that of the classical pattern. This finding suggests that the illusion might be caused by processes that occurafter the computation of depth. All three experiments indicated that the illusion may be producedlater in the processing stream than has previously been suggested.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brentano, F. (1892). Über ein optisches Paradoxen.Journal of Psychology,3, 349–358.
Coren, S. (1970). Lateral inhibition and geometrie illusion.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,22, 274–278.
Coren, S., &Girgus, J. S. (1973). Visual spatial illusions: Many explanations.Science,179, 503–504.
Coren, S., &Girgus, J. S. (1978).Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Day, R. H. (1972). Visual spatial illusions: A general explanation.Science,175, 1335–1340.
Delboeue, J. L. R. (1892). Sur une nouvelle illusion d’optique.Academie Royale des Sciences, de Lettres et des Beaux Arts de Belgique Bulletins,24, 545–558.
DeLucia, P., &Hochberg, J. (1985). Illusions in the real world and in the mind’s eye.Proceedings of the Eastern Psychological Association,56, 38. (Abstract)
DeLucia, P., &Hochberg, J. (1986). Real-world geometrical illusions: Theoretical and practical implications.Proceedings of the Eastern Psychological Association,57, 62. (Abstract)
DeValois, R. L., &Devalois, K. K. (1988).Spatial vision. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gibson, J. J. (1966).The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Ginsburg, A. P. (1984). Visual form perception based on biological filtering. In L. Spillman & B. R. Wooten (Eds.),Sensory experience. adaptation and perception (pp. 53–72). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ginsburg, A. P. (1986). Spatial filtering and visual form perception. In K. R. Boff, Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 2, pp. 34-1 to 34-41). New York: Wiley.
Gogel, W. (1977). The metric of visual space. In W. Epstein (Ed.),Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes (pp. 129–181). New York: Wiley.
Goldstein, M. B., &Weintraub, D. J. (1972). The parallel-less Poggendorff: Virtual contours put the illusion down but not out.Perception & Psychophysics,11, 353–355.
Gregory, R. L. (1963). Distortion of visual space as inappropriate constancy scaling.Nature,199, 678–680.
Gregory, R. L. (1966).Eye and bruin. New York: World University Library.
Gregory, R. L. (1968). Visual illusions.Scientific American,219, 66–76.
Julesz, B. (1971).Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kanizsa, G. (1974). Contours with gradients or cognitive contours?Italian Journal of Psychology,1, 93–112.
Lewis, E. O. (1909). Confluxion and contrast effects in the Müller-Lyer illusion.British Journal of Psychology,3, 21–41.
Marr, D. (1982).Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Müller-Lyer, F. C. (1889). Optische Urteilstauschungen.Dubois-Reymonds Archivefür Anatomie und Physiologie (Suppl.), 263–270.
Ono, H., &Comerford, J. (1977). Stereoscopic depth constancy. In W. Epstein (Ed.),Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes (pp. 91–128). New York: Wiley.
Papert, S. (1961). Centrally produced geometrical illusions.Nature,191, 733.
Schiller, P., &Weiner, M. (1962). Binocular and stereoscopic viewing of geometrie illusions.Perceptual & Motor Skills,13, 739–747.
Shepard, R. N., &Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.Science,171, 701–703.
Waite, H., &Massaro, D. W. (1970). A test of Gregory’s constancyscaling explanation of the Müller-Lyer ülusion.Nature,227, 733–734.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is based in part on a dissertation submitted by the author to Rutgers University, New Brunswick
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nijhawan, R. Three-dimensional Müller-Lyer illusion. Perception & Psychophysics 49, 333–341 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205989
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205989