Abstract
Do readers encode the perceptual perspectives of characters during narrative comprehension? To address this question, we conducted two experiments using stories that sometimes described situations in which certain information was occluded from the protagonists’ views. We generated two related hypotheses concerning the potential impact of occlusion events on text representations. One, theevent boundary hypothesis, suggested that any salient narrative event would reduce the accessibility of prior story information. The second, theperceptual availability hypothesis, suggested that accessibility would decrease most for information no longer visible to story protagonists. In Experiment 1, the participants were slowest to respond to verification questions that asked about occluded information. In Experiment 2, we demonstrated that this effect did not extend to other, nonoccluded information. These results suggest that readers encode text information from the perceptual perspective of story protagonists. This is consistent with recent perceptual symbol views of language comprehension.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allbritton, D. W., &Gerrig, R. J. (1991). Participatory responses in prose understanding.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 603–626.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,22, 577–609.
Bryant, D. J., Tversky, B., &Franklin, N. (1992). Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 74–98.
de Vega, M. (1995). Backward updating of mental models during continuous reading of narratives.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 373–385.
Duchan, J. F., Bruder, G. A., &Hewitt, L. E. (1995).Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fincher-Kiefer, R. (2001). Perceptual components of situation models.Memory & Cognition,29, 336–343.
Garnham, A., &Oakhill, J. (1996). The mental models theory of language comprehension. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.),Models of understanding text (pp. 313–339). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1985). Surface information loss in comprehension.Cognitive Psychology,17, 324–363.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990).Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gerrig, R. J. (1993).Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Gerrig, R. J., &McKoon, G. (2001). Memory processes and experiential continuity.Psychological Science,12, 81–85.
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,20, 1–55.
Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., &Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 69–83.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction#x2014;integration model.Psychological Review,95, 163–182.
Kintsch, W. (1998).Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, G. A., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976).Language and perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Morrow, D. G. (2001). Situation models and point of view in narrative understanding. In W. van Peer & S. Chatman (Eds.),New perspectives on narrative perspective (pp. 225–239). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Morrow, D. G., Bower, G. H., &Greenspan, S. L. (1989). Updating situation models during narrative comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 292–312.
Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., &Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 165–187.
O’Brien, J. E., &Albrecht, E. J. (1992). Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 777–784.
Rapp, D. N., Gerrig, R. J., &Prentice, D. A. (2001). Readers’ traitbased models of characters in narrative comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,45, 737–750.
Stanfield, R. A., &Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition.Psychological Science,12, 153–156.
Stevenson, R. L. (1993). The strange case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. In I. Bell (Ed.),Robert Louis Stevenson: The complete short stories, (Vol. 2, pp. 102–164). Edinburgh: Mainstream Publishing. (Original work published 1885)
van Dijk, T. A., &Kintsch, W. (1983).Strategies in discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Processing narrative time shifts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1196–1207.
Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Situation models: The mental leap into imagined worlds.Current Directions in Psychological Science,8, 15–18.
Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., &Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 386–397.
Zwaan, R. A., &Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory.Psychological Bulletin,123, 162–185.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This material is based on work supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grants IRI-9711974 and (in cooperation with the Perseus Digital Library Project) IIS-9817484.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Horton, W.S., Rapp, D.N. Out of sight, out of mind: Occlusion and the accessibility of information in narrative comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10, 104–110 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196473
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196473