Abstract
Accessibility of characters in two-character sentences (e.g.,The butler helped Calvin at the wedding reception) was investigated with a probe recognition task. Probes were either the first character (e.g., butler) or the second character (e.g.,Calvin) in a sentence and were designated by proper names or common nouns crossed with name or noun nonprobes. Results show that (1) probes in first position are more accessible than those in second position, but not when noun probes are paired with name nonprobes, (2) characters designated by names are generally more accessible than those designated by nouns, and (3) the first name in a sentence is more available than other characters, regardless of position. Thus, accessibility of characters in a sentence seems dependent on discourse function, with named characters seen as main characters, rather than on nondiscourse-related factors, such as temporal distinctiveness.
Article PDF
References
Burke, D. M., MacKay, D. G., Worthley, J. A., &Wade, E. (1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults?Journal of Memory & Language,30, 542–579.
Carreiras, M., Gernsbacher, M. A., &Villa, V. (1995). The advantage of first mention in Spanish.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 124–129.
Cohen, G. (1990). Why is it difficult to put names to faces?British Journal of Psychology,81, 287–297.
Corbett, A. T., &Chang, F. R. (1983). Pronoun disambiguation: Accessing potential antecedents.Memory & Cognition,11, 283–294.
Garrod, S., Freudenthal, D., &Boyle, E. (1994). The role of different types of anaphor in the on-line resolution of sentences in a discourse.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 39–68.
Garrod, S., &Sanford, A. J. (1985). On the real-time character of interpretation during reading.Language & Cognitive Processes,1, 43–59.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1989). Mechanisms that improve referential access.Cognition,32, 99–156.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990).Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1996, October 31).The ubiquity of the advantage of first mention. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.
Gernsbacher, M. A., &Hargreaves, D. (1988). Accessing sentence participants: The advantage of first mention.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 699–717.
Gernsbacher, M. A., Hargreaves, D., &Beeman, M. (1989). Building and accessing clausal representations: The advantage of first mention versus the advantage of clause recency.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 735–755.
Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Ledoux, K., &Yang, C. L. (1999). Processing of reference and the structure of language: An analysis of complex noun phrases.Language & Cognitive Processes,14, 353–379.
Knoedler, A. J. (1994).Cue-dependent differential distinctiveness effects in sentence processing. Unpublished masters thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
MacWhinney, B. (1977). Starting points.Language,53, 152–168.
McDonald, J. L., &MacWhinney, B. (1995). The time course of anaphor resolution: Effects of implicit verb causality and gender.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 543–566.
Neath, I. (1993). Distinctiveness and serial position effects in recognition.Memory & Cognition,21, 689–698.
Neath, I., &Knoedler, A. J. (1994). Distinctiveness and serial position effects in recognition and sentence processing.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 776–795.
Robertson, D. A., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Robertson, R. R. W. (1995).The advantage of referential specificity, first mention, and suppression and enhancement. Unpublished manuscript.
Sanford, A. J., Clegg, M., &Majid, A. (1998). The influence of types of character on processing background information in narrative discourse.Memory & Cognition,26, 1323–1329.
Sanford, A. J., Moar, K., &Garrod, S. C. (1988). Proper names as controllers of discourse focus.Language & Speech,31, 43–56.
Shaibe, D. M., & McDonald, J. L. (1993, November).Why is the president less accessible than Hillary? Paper presented at the 34th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC.
Von Eckardt, B., &Potter, M. C. (1985). Clauses and the semantic representation of words.Memory & Cognition,13, 371–376.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mcdonald, J.L., Shaibe, D.M. The accessibility of characters in single sentences: Proper names, common nouns, and first mention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, 356–361 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196293
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196293