Abstract
In the standard sequential reaction time study, subjects are presented with a repeating sequence of targets to which they must respond as rapidly as possible. With practice reaction times decrease, suggesting a learned ability to exploit the repeating patterns in the display. In a common variation, a second task is interposed, typically a tone-counting task in which subjects must keep track of the frequency with which particular tones occur. In the canonical experiment, these tones appear at varying times in the interval between the subjects’ response to a target and the next target. Data are presented that show that this latter variable (the RSOA, response-secondary stimulus onset asynchrony) actually plays an important but previously hidden role in these experiments. A model based on an extension of the notion of the psychological refractory period is introduced to explain these findings.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldwin, K. B., &Kutas, M. (1997). An ERP analysis of implicit structured sequence learning.Psychophyiology,34, 74–86.
Cleeremans, A. (1993).Mechanisms of implicit learning: Connectionist models of sequence processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cleeremans, A., &Jiménez, L. (1998). Implicit sequence learning: The truth is in the details. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.),Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 323–364). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cleeremans, A., &McClelland, J. L. (1991). Learning the structure of event sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,120, 235–253.
Cohen, A., Ivry, R. I., &Keele, S.W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 17–30.
Creamer, L.R. (1963). Event uncertainty, psychological refractory period, and human data processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology,66, 187–194.
Curran, T. (1998). Implicit sequence learning from a cognitive neuroscience perspective: What, how and where? In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.),Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 365–400). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Curran, T., &Keele, S. W. (1993). Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 189–202.
Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (1999).Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Unpublished manuscript.
Eimer, M., Goschke, R., Schlaghecken, F., &Stürmer, B. (1996). Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 970–987.
Frensch, P. A., Buchner, A., &Lin, J. (1994). Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transactions in the presence and absence of a distractor task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 567–584.
Frensch, P. A., Lin, J., &Buchner, A. (1998). Learning versus behavioral expression of the learned: The effects of a secondary tonecounting task on implicit learning in the serial reaction time task.Psychological Research,61, 83–98.
Frensch, P.A., &Miner, C. S. (1994). Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning.Memory & Cognition,22, 95–110.
Grafton, S. T., Hazeltine, E., &Ivry, R. [B.] (1995). Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans.Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences,7, 497–510.
Heuer, H., &Schmidtke, V. (1996). Secondary-task effects on sequence learning.Psychological Research,59, 176–186.
Hsiao, A., &Reber, A. S. (1998). The role of attention in implicit sequence learning. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.),Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 471–494). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jiménez, L., Mendez, C., &Cleeremans, A. (1996). Comparing direct and indirect measures of sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 948–969.
Jolicoeur, P. (1999). Restricted attentional capacity between sensory modalities.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 87–92.
Keele, S. W., Ivry, R. B., Hazeltine, E., Mayr, U., & Heuer, H. (1999).The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation: Timing in the SRT task (Tech. Rep. 98-03, Revised). Institute of Cognitive and Decision Sciences, University of Oregon.
Mayr, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 350–364.
Nissen, M. J., &Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures.Cognitive Psychology,19, 1–32.
Pashler, H. E. (1998).The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rah, S. K.-Y., Reber, A. S., &Hsiao, A. T. (2000). Another wrinkle on the dual-task SRT experiment: It’s probably not dual task.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 309–313.
Reber, P. J., &Squire, L. R. (1994). Parallel brain systems for learning with and without awareness.Learning & Memory,1, 217–229.
Reed, J., &Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 585–594.
Schmidtke, V., &Heuer, H. (1997). Task integration as a factor in secondary-task effects on sequence learning.Psychological Research,60, 53–71.
Shanks, D. R., &Johnstone, T. (1998). Implicit knowledge in sequential learning tasks. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.),Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 533–572). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stadler, M. A. (1989). On learning complex procedural knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1061–1069.
Stadler, M. A. (1995). Role of attention in implicit learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 819–827.
Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., &Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1424–1430.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Support for this project came from a PSC-CUNY grant. We thank Simon Rah and Lieb Litman for help on various phases of this project. The data from this study were reported at the 1997 meeting of the Psychonomic Society.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hsiao, A.T., Reber, A.S. The dual-task SRT procedure: Fine-tuning the timing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 336–342 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196170
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196170