Abstract
An intersection of three literatures (skilled word recognition, spatial attention, and the Stroop effect) is addressed in a series of four experiments. The results, in conjunction with other observations, are taken to suggest that (1) thedefault value for spatial attention in visual word recognition is distributed across the word, (2) precuing a single letter position serves to narrow the focus of spatial attention, and (3) this reduces or prevents activation in the word recognition system. Consequently, the Stroop effect is reduced in magnitude or eliminated, depending on details of the context. Contrary to the widespread view that it reflects automatic processing, the Stroop effect is better conceptualized as reflecting the action of default settings in the word recognition and attentional systems. Some relations between consciousness, context, and control are noted.
Article PDF
References
Anderson, J. (1995).Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Freeman.
Ashcraft, M. H. (1994).Human memory and cognition. New York: Harper Collins.
Bauer, B., &Besner, D. (1997). Processing in the Stroop task: Mental set as a determinant of performance.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,51, 61–68.
Besner, D., &Stolz, J. A. (in press). Unconsciously controlled processing: The Stroop effect reconsidered.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Besner, D., Stolz, J. A., &Boutilier, C. (1997). The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 221–225.
Brunn, J. L., &Farah, M. J. (1991). The relation between spatial attention and reading: Evidence from the neglect syndrome.Cognitive Neuropsychology,8, 59–75.
Cohen, J., &Huston, T. A. (1994). Progress in the use of interactive models for understanding attention and performance. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 453–476). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
Crowder, R. G., &Wagner, R. F. (1992).The psychology of reading. New York: Oxford University Press.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1993). Contingent attentional capture: A Reply to Yantis (1993).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 682–685.
Johnston, J. C. (1981). Effects of advance precueing of alternatives on the perception of letters alone and in words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 560–572.
Johnston, J. C., &McClelland, J. L. (1974). Perception of letters in words: Seek not and ye shall find.Science,184, 1192–1194.
Kahneman, D., &Henik, A. (1981). Perceptual organization and attention. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 181–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
LaBerge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 371–379.
Lowe, D. G., &Mitterer, J. O. (1982) Selective and divided attention in a Stroop task.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 684–700.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin,109, 163–203.
McCann, R. S., Folk, C. L., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). The role of spatial attention in visual word processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1015–1029.
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Rayner, K., &Pollatsek, A. (1989).The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 275–280.
Reisberg, D. (1997).Cognition: Exploring the science of the mind. New York: Norton.
Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 206–217.
Stolz, J. A., &Besner, D. (1996). The role of set in visual word recognition: Activation and activation blocking as non-automatic processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1166–1177.
Stolz, J. A., &Besner, D. (in press). Levels of representation in visual word recognition: A dissociation between morphemic and semantic processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–661.
Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., Sneg, R., &Baruch, O. (1996). Unintentional reading via the phonological route: The Stroop effect with cross script homophones.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 336–349.
Van Selst, M., &Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 631–650.
Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 676–681.
Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 45–76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grants A0998, OGP0183905, and EQP0187220 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada. We thank R. S. McCann for comments on a draft of the manuscript and K. Rayner, B. A. Levy, and R. Klein for their reviews.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Besner, D., Stolz, J.A. What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6, 99–104 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210815
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210815