Abstract
To test whether groups differ in a particular ability, researchers often compare their performance on two tasks: an experimental task that is sensitive to the ability of interest and a control task that measures other influences on the experimental task. A group difference will be reflected in a differential deficit, a greater difference between groups in experimental task performance than in control task performance. Before concluding from such a result that the groups differ in the ability of interest, three methodological problems must be faced. First, a differential deficit may be an artifact of task differences in discriminating power. That is, the experimental task may be more sensitive than the control task to group differences in abilities other than the one of interest. Second, a differential deficit may be an artifact of group differences in familiarity with the stimuli or the task. Third, a group difference in one ability may be due to a difference in some other ability that is more, or less, general than the first. These problems affect research in a number of areas, including cognitive development, psychopathology, learning disabilities, and the theory of intelligence. We discuss some possible solutions to these problems.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D.The psychology of memory. New York: Basic Books, 1976.
Baron, J. Semantic components and conceptual development.Cognition, 1973,2, 299–317.
Baron, J. Intelligence and general strategies. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Strategies in information processing. London: Academic Press, 1978.
Baron, J. Orthographic and word-specific knowledge in children’s reading of words.Child Development, 1979,50, 60–72.
Baron, J., Freyd, J., &Stewart, J. Individual differences in general abilities useful in solving problems. In R. Nickerson (Ed.),Attention and performance VIII. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1980.
Baron, J., &Treiman, R. Use of orthography in reading and learning to read. In R. Venezky & J. Kavanagh (Eds.),Orthography, reading, and dyslexia. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1980.
Belmont, D. M., &Butterfield, E. C. Learning strategies as determinants of memory deficiencies.Cognitive Psychology, 1971,2, 411–420.
Brown, A. L. Strategic behavior in retardate memory. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.),International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press, 1974.
Chapman, L. D., &Chapman, J. P.Disordered thought in schizophrenia. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1973. (a)
Chapman, L. J., &Chapman, J. P. Problems in the measurement of cognitive deficit.Psychological Bulletin, 1973,79, 380–385. (b)
Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P. Alternatives to the design of manipulating a variable to compare retarded and normal subjects.American Journal of Men tal Deficiently, 1974,79, 404–411.
Chapman, L. J., &Chapman, J. P. The measurement of differential deficit.Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1978,14, 303–311.
Chi, M. T. H. Knowledge structures and memory development. In R. Siegler (Ed.),Children’s thinking: What develops? Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Cohen, J., &Cohen, P.Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.
Cohen, M., &Scribern, S.Culture and thought: A psychological introduction. New York: Wiley, 1974.
Conrad, R. Practice, familiarity, and reading rme for words and nonsense syllables.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,14, 71–76.
Cronbach.L. J. The two disciplines of scientific psychology.American Psychologist, 1957,12, 671–684.
Dunn, O. J., &Clark, V. Comparison of test of the equality of dependent correlation coefficients.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1971,66, 904–908.
Fitts, P. M., &Posner, M. I.Human performance. Belmont, Calif: Brooks/Cole, 1967.
Flavell, J. H. Developmental studies of mediated memory. In H. W. Reese & L. P. kipsett (Eds.),Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 5). New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Hunt, E. Mechanics of verbal ability.Psychological Review, 1978,85,271–283.
Jackson, M. D., &McClelland, J. L. Processing determinants of reading speed.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1979,108, 151–181.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., &Legrenzi, M. S. Reasoning and a sense of reality.British Journal of Psychology, 1972,63,395–400.
Kahneman, D.Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall, 1973.
LaBerge, D. Acquisition of automatic processing in perceptual and associative learning. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance V. London: Academic Press, 1975.
Loftus, G. R. On interpretation of interactions.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 312–319.
Lord, F. M. Statistical adjustments when comparing preexisting groups.Psychological Bulletin, 1969,72, 336–337.
Lord, F. M., &NowcR, M. R.Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1968.
Lyon, D. R. Individual differences in immediate serial recall: A matter of mnemonics?Cognitive Psychology, 1977,9, 403–411.
MacLeod, C. M., Dekaban, A. S., &Hunt, E. Memory impairment in epileptic patients: Selective effects of phenobarbital level.Science, 1978,202, 1102–1104.
McClelland, J. L. On the time-relations of mental processes: A framework for analyzing processes in cascade.Psychological Review, 1979,86, 287–330.
Mosteller, F., &Tukey, J.Data analyis and regression. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1977.
Oltmanns, T. F. Selective attention in schizophrenia and manic psychoses: The effect of distraction on information processing.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1978,87, 212–225.
Reisserg, D., Baron, J., &Kemler, D. G. Overcoming Stroop interference: Effect of practice on distractor potency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980,6, 140–150.
Sternberg, R. J.Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning. Hillsdale, N. J: Erlbaum, 1977.
Sternberg, R. J. The nature of mental abilities.American Psychologist, 1979,34, 214–230.
Sternberg, S. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donder’s method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.),Attention and performance H. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1969.
Traupman, K. L. Differential deficit: Psychometric remediation is not acceptable for psychometric artifact.The Quarterly Newsletter of the Institute for Comparative Human Development, 1976,1, 2–3.
Treiman, R., &Baron, J. Segmental analysis ability: Development and relation to reading. In T. G. Waller & G. E. MacKinn (Eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1980.
Underwood, B. J. Individual differences as a crucible in theory construction.American Psychologist, 1975,30, 128–134.
Vellutino, F. R., Steger, J. A., DeSetto, L., &Phillips, F. Reading disability: Age differences and the perceptual deficit hypothesis.Child Development, 1975,46, 487–493.
Williams, E. J.Regression analysis. New York: Wiley, 1959.
Wishner, J., Stein, M. K., &Peastrel, A. A. Information processing stages in schizophrenia.Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1978,14, 35–44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baron, J., Treiman, R. Some problems in the study of differences in cognitive processes. Memory & Cognition 8, 313–321 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198270
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198270