Abstract
The implicit association test (IAT) is typically used to assess nonconscious categorization judgments that are “under control of automatically activated evaluation” (Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998, p. 1464) and that are usually considered independent of explicit judgments. The present study builds on recent work suggesting evidence of short-term modifiability of the IAT effect. Specifically, we show that reading a short text that describes a novel, fictional scenario, within which the to-be-evaluated categories are embedded, can produce substantial and immediate modulations of the IAT effect. This modulation effect does not occur when subjects are simply instructed to think about counterstereotypical associations (Experiment 1A and 1B). In Experiment 2, we use a variant of the IAT to show that scenario modulation cannot be explained in terms of strategic criterion shifts. These results suggest that a newly acquired knowledge structure targeting the abstract, category level can produce behavioral effects typically associated with automatic categorization.
Article PDF
References
Ahn, W.-K., Kim, N. S., Lassaline, M. E., &Dennis, M. (2000). Causal status as a determinant of feature centrality.Cognitive Psychology,41, 361–416.
Ashburn-Nardo, L., Voils, C. I., &Monteith, M. J. (2001). Implicit associations as the seeds of intergroup bias: How easily do they take root?Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,81, 789–799.
Bargh, J. A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.),Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 361–382). New York: Guilford.
Blair, I. V., Ma, J. E., &Lenton, A. P. (2001). Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,81, 828–841.
Bodenhausen, G. V., &Macrae, C. N. (1998). Stereotype activation and inhibition. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Ed.),Advances in social cognition: Vol. 11. Stereotype activation and inhibition (pp. 1–52). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brendl, C. M., Markman, A. B., &Messner, C. (2001). How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the implicit association test.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,81, 760–773.
Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.),Advances in social cognition: Vol. 1. A dual process model of impression formation (pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dasgupta, N., &Greenwald, A. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired admired and disliked individuals.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,81, 800–814.
Dehaene, S., Kerszberg, M., &Changeux, J.-P. (1998). A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,95, 14529–14534.
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,56, 5–18.
Devine, P. G. (2001). Implicit prejudice and stereotyping: How automatic are they?Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,81, 757–759.
Fiske, S. T., &Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1–74). San Diego: Academic Press.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.American Psychologist,54, 493–503.
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., &Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,74, 1464–1480.
Holyoak, K. J., &Simon, D. (1999). Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 3–31.
Hommel, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 247–273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Klauer, K. C., &Musch, J. (2002). Goal-dependent and goal-independent effects of irrelevant evaluations.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,28, 802–814.
Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization.Psychological Review,95, 492–527.
Mayr, U., &Keele, S. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 4–26.
McConnell, A. R., &Leibold, J. M. (2001). Relations among the implicit association test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,37, 435–442.
Medin, D. L., &Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.),Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179–195). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Neumann, O., &Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 123–150). San Diego: Academic Press.
Nosek, B. A., &Banaji, M. R. (2001). The go/no-go association task.Social Cognition,19, 625–666.
Simon, D., &Holyoak, K. J. (2002). Structural dynamics of cognition: From consistency theories to constraint satisfaction.Personality & Social Psychology Review,6, 283–294.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was funded through NIA Grant R01 AG19296-01A1, awarded to U.M.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Foroni, F., Mayr, U. The power of a story: New, automatic associations from a single reading of a short scenario. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 139–144 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196359
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196359