Skip to main content
Log in

Subjective complaints of people living near mobile phone base stations in Poland

International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of our study was to assess the health conditions and subjective symptoms of the inhabitants living in the base stations vicinity and to analyse the relationship between the complaints and level of exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF).

Materials and Methods

Our study was performed in housing estates located in five regions of Łódź. The electric field measurements were performed in the buildings located closest to the azimuth of the antennas. Respondents were selected by trained interviewers using an uniform procedure. The number of the households to be examined was set at a minimum of 420. The questionnaire contained: demographic data, occupational and environmental exposure to EMF, health condition, subjective complaints. Results were adjusted for confounders (age, gender, EMF at the workplace and EMF emitted by household equipment) using multiple regression model.

Results

181 men and 319 women from 500 households were examined. Electric field above 0.8 V/m was recorded in 12% of flats. There was no significant correlation between electric field strength and the distance of examined flats from the base stations. To make possible comparison with relevant literature, we analysed also the frequency of the reported symptoms vs. the distance. Headache was declared by 57% people, most frequently (36.4%) living 100–150 m away from the base station compared to people living at longer distances (p = 0.013). 24.4% subjects, mostly living at a distance above 150 m, declared impaired memory. Difference was statistically significant in comparison with people living at other distances (p = 0.004).

Conclusions

The explanation why we did not find any correlation between the electric field strength and frequency of subjective symptoms but found a correlation between subjective symptoms and distance from base station needs further studies. Maybe new metrics of exposure assessment should be adopted for this purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Santini R, Santini P, Danze JM, Le Ruz P, Seigne M. Study of the health of people living in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations: I. Influences of distance and sex. Pathol Biol 2002;50:369–373.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Santini R, Santini P, Le Ruz P, Danze JM, Seigne M. Survey Study of People Living in the Vicinity of Cellular Phone Base Stations. Electromag Biol Med 2003;1:41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Navarro EA, Segura J, Portoles M, Gomez-Peretta C. The Microwave syndrome: A preliminary study in Spain. Electromag Biol Med 2003;22:161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hutter HP, Moshamer H, Wallner P, Kundi M. Subjective symptoms, sleeping problems and cognitive performance in subjects living near mobile phone base stations. Occup Environ Med 2006;63:307–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abdel-Rassoul G, El-Fateh OA, Salem MA, Michaele A, Farahat F, El-Batanomy M, et al. Neurobehavioral effects among inhabitants around mobile phone base stations. Neurotoxicology 2007;28:434–440.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Berg-Beckhoff G, Blettner M, Kowall B, Breckenkamp J, Schlehofer B, Schmiedel S, et al. Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: Phase 2 of a cross-sectional study with measured radio frequency electromagnetic fields. Occup Environ Med 2009;66:124–130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bergqvist U, Friedrich G, Hamnerius Y, Martens L, Neubauer G, Thuroczy G, et al. Mobile telecommunication base stations — exposure to electromagnetic fields. Report of a Short Term Mission. COST 244bis: 11th Workshop on Biomedical Applications of EMFs and Management Committee Meeting, 2000 Oct 7–8; Bled, Slovenia. p. 1–77 [cited 2001 May 10]. Available from URL:http://www.radio.fer/cost244.

  8. Haumann T, Münzenberg U, Maes W, Sierck P, Kostarakis P, editors. HF-radiation levels of GSM cellular phone towers in residential areas. Proceedings of the Biological Effects of PEMs 2nd International Workshop, Electronics — Telecom and Applications Laboratory, Physics Department, University of Ioannima, Institute of Informatics and Telecommunications; 2002 Oct 7–11; Rhodos, Greece. Athens: N.C.S.R. Demokritos; 2002. p. 327–333.

  9. Mantiply ED, Pohl KR, Poppell SW, Murphy JA. Summary of measured radiofrequency electric and magnetic fields (10 kHz to 30 GHz) in the general and work environment. Bioelectromagnetics 1997;18:563–577.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Petersen RC, Testagrossa PA. Radio-frequency electromagnetic fields associated with cellular-radio cell-site antennas. Bioelectromagnetics 1992;13:527–542.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mann SM, Cooper TG, Allen SG, Blackwell RP, Lowe AJ Exposure to radio waves near mobile phone base stations [report]. Natl Radiol Protec Board 2000;NRPB-R321 (UK).

  12. Parsons JD. The Mobile Phone Propagation Channel. New York: Wiley and Sons; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ordinance of the Ministry of Environmental Protection, Republic of Poland, October 30, 2003. J Law, 2003 No.192, pos. 18.

  14. Thansandote A, Gajda GB, Lecuyer DW. Radiofrequency radiation in five Vancouver schools: exposure standards not exceeded. Can Med Assoc J 1999;160:1311–1312.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Petersen RC, Fahly-Elwood AK. Wireless telecommunications: Technology and RF safety issues. In: Hardy KA, Meltz ML, editors. Non-Ionizing Radiation: An Overview of the Physics and biology. Madison (WI): Medical Physics Publishing; 1997. p. 197–226.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ICNIRP. Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys 1998;74(4):494–522.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hardell L, Sage C. Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards. Biomed Pharmacother 2008;62:104–109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Neubauer G, Feychting M, Hamnerius Y, Kheifets L, Kuster N, Ruiz I, et al. Feasibility of future epidemiological studies on possible health effects of mobile phone base stations. Bioelectromagnetics 2007;28:224–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Blettner M, Schlehofer B, Breckenkamp J, Kowall B, Schmiedel S, Reis U, et al. Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: Phase 1 of a population-based, cross-sectional study in Germany. Occup Environ Med 2009;66:118–123 [in German].

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Portier ChJ, Wolfe MS. Assessment of health effects from exposure to power-line frequency electric and magnetic fields. Working Group Report. NIEHS Working Group Report. NIH Publication No. 98-3981. Research Triangle Park (NC): NIEHS; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Röösli M. Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: A systematic review. Environ Res 2008;107:277–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moser M, Röösli M. Epidemiological Studies on Mobile Phone base Stations and Health. Possible Biological Outcomes and Study Designs. Cost 281: Workshop on Mobile Phone base Stations and Health, 2003 May 15–16; Dublin, Ireland [cited 2003 Aug 15]. Available from URL:http://www.radio.fer/cost281.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alicja Bortkiewicz.

Additional information

This study was supported by the National Committee for Scientific Research (KBN) in Poland

About this article

Cite this article

Bortkiewicz, A., Gadzicka, E., Szyjkowska, A. et al. Subjective complaints of people living near mobile phone base stations in Poland. IJOMEH 25, 31–40 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13382-012-0007-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13382-012-0007-9

Key words

Navigation