Skip to main content
Log in

Toward autonomous, compliant, omnidirectional humanoid robots for natural interaction in real-life settings

  • Position Paper
  • Published:
Paladyn

Abstract

The field of robotics has made steady progress in the pursuit of bringing autonomous machines into real-life settings. Over the last 3 years, we have seen omnidirectional humanoid platforms that now bring compliance, robustness and adaptiveness to handle the unconstrained situations of the real world. However, today’s contributions mostly address only a portion of the physical, cognitive or evaluative dimensions, which are all interdependent. This paper presents an overview of our attempt to integrate as a whole all three dimensions into a robot named Johnny-0. We present Johnny-0’s distinct contributions in simultaneously exploiting compliance at the locomotion level, in grounding reasoning and actions through behaviors, and in considering all possible factors experimenting in the wildness of the real world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Borst, T. Wimbrock, F. Schmidt, M. Fuchs, B. Brunner, F. Zacharias, P. R. Giordano, R. Konietschke, W. Sepp, S. Fuchs, C. Rink, A. Albu-Schaffer, and G. Hirzinger, “Rollin’ Justin — mobile platformwith variable base,” in Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2009, pp. 1597–1598.

  2. K. Wyrobek, E. Berger, H. der Loos Van, and K. Salisbury, “Towards a personal robotics development platform: Rationale and design of an intrinsically safe personal robot,” in Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2008.

  3. A. Jain and C. C. Kemp, “Pulling open novel doors and drawers with equilibrium point control,” in Proceedings IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robotics, 2009.

  4. —, “Behavior-based door opening with equilibrium point control,” in RSS Workshop: Mobile Manipulation in Human Environments, 2009.

  5. B. Graf, C. Parlitz, and M. Hägele, “Robotic home assistant Care-O-bot£ 3 product vision and innovation platform,” in Proceedings Human-Computer Interaction, 2009, pp. 312–320.

  6. J. S. Albus, “Outline for a theory of intelligence,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 473–509, May/June 1991.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. R. J. Brachman, “(AA)AI more than the sum of its parts,” AI Magazine, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 19–34, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Michaud, “EMIB — Computational architecture based on emotion and motivation for intentional selection and configuration of behaviour-producing modules,” Cognitive Science Quaterly, Special Issue on Desires, Goals, Intentions, and Values: Computational Architectures, vol. 3–4, pp. 340–361, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Maxwell, W. Smart, A. Jacoff, J. Casper, B. Weiss, J. Scholtz, H. Yanco, M. Micire, A. Stroupe, D. Stormont, and T. Lauwers, “2003 AAAI robot competition and exhibition,” AI Magazine, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 68–80, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. Michaud, J. Audet, D. Letourneau, L. Lussier, C. Theberge-Turmel, and S. Caron, “Experiences with an autonomous robot attending the AAAI conference,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 23–29, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. Michaud, C. Cote, D. Letourneau, Y. Brosseau, J.-M. Valin, E. Beaudry, C. Raievsky, A. Ponchon, P. Moisan, P. Lepage, Y. Morin, F. Gagnon, P. Giguere, M.-A. Roux, S. Caron, P. Frenette, and F. Kabanza, “Spartacus attending the 2005 AAAI conference,” Autonomous Robots, Special Issue on AAAI Mobile Robot Competition, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 369–384, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Michaud, Y. Brosseau, C. Cote, D. Letourneau, P. Moisan, A. Ponchon, C. Raievsky, J.-M. Valin, E. Beaudry, and F. Kabanza, “Modularity and integration in the design of a socially interactive robot,” in Proceedings IEEE InternationalWorkshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005, pp. 172–177.

  13. C. Cote, Y. Brosseau, D. Letourneau, C. Raievsky, and F. Michaud, “Using MARIE in software development and integration for autonomous mobile robotics,” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, Special Issue on Software Development and Integration in Robotics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 55–60, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Cote, D. Letourneau, C. Raievsky, Y. Brosseau, and F. Michaud, “Using MARIE for mobile robot software development and integration,” in Software Engineering for Experimental Robotics, D. Brugali, Ed. Springer Tracts on Advanced Robotics, 2006.

  15. F. Michaud, D. Letourneau, E. Beaudry, M. Frechette, F. Kabanza, and M. Lauria, “Iterative design of advanced mobile robots,” International Journal of Computing and Information Technology, Special Issue on Advanced Mobile Robotics, vol. 4, pp. 1–16, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. L. Dickerson and B. D. Lapin, “Control of an omni-directional robotic vehicle with mecanum wheels,” in Proceedings National Telesystems Conference, 1991, pp. 323–328.

  17. G. Campion and W. Chung, Wheeled robots. Handbook of Robotics, 2008, pp. 391–410.

  18. F. Michaud, D. Letourneau, M. Arsenault, Y. Bergeron, R. Cadrin, F. Gagnon, M.-A. Legault, M. Millette, J.-F. Pare, M.-C. Tremblay, P. Lepage, Y. Morin, and S. Caron, “Multi-modal locomotion robotic platform using leg-track-wheel articulations,” Autonomous Robots, Special Issue on Unconventional Robotic Mobility, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 137–156, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. P. Buerger, “Stable, high-force, low impedance robotic actuators for human-interactive machines,” Ph.D. dissertation, Massachussetts Institute of Technology, 2005.

  20. N. Hogan and S. P. Buerger, “Impedance and interaction control,” in Robotics and Automation Handbook. CRC Press, 2005.

  21. W. Williamson, “Series elastic actuators,” Ph.D. dissertation, Massachussetts Institute of Technology, 1995.

  22. D. W. Robinson, “Design and analysis of series elasticity in closed loop actuator force control,” Ph.D. dissertation, Massachussetts Institute of Technology, 2000.

  23. M. Lauria, M.-A. Legault, M.-A. Lavoie, and F. Michaud, “Differential elastic actuator for robotic interaction tasks,” in Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2008.

  24. G. Hirzinger, N. Sporer, M. Schedl, J. Butterfass, and M. Grebenstein, “Torque-controlled lightweight arms and articulated hands: Do we reach technological limits now?” International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 23, pp. 331–340, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. C. Ott, O. Eiberger, W. Friedl, B. Bäuml, U. Hillenbr, C. Borst, A. Albu-schäffer, B. Brunner, H. Hirschmüller, S. Kielhöfer, R. Konietschke, T. Wimböck, F. Zacharias, and G. Hirzinger, “A humanoid two-arm system for dexterous manipulation,” in Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2006, pp. 276–283.

  26. A. Albu-Schaffer, O. Eiberger, M. Grebenstein, S. Haddadin, C. Ott, T. Wimbock, S. Wolf, and G. Hirzinger, “Soft robotics,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, vol. 15, pp. 20–30, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. K. Wyrobek, E. Berger, H. V. der Loos, and K. Salisbury, “Towards a personal robotics development platform: Rationale and design of an intrinsically safe personal robot,” in Proceedings International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2008.

  28. C. Rich and C. L. Sidner, “Robots and avatars as hosts, advisors, companions and jesters,” AI Magazine, vol. 30, pp. 29–41, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  29. K. Carter, M. Scheutz, and P. Schermerhorn, “A humanoid-robotic replica in usarsim for HRI,” in IROS Workshop on Robots, Games, and Research, St. Louis, MO, October 2009.

  30. E. Marder-Eppstein, E. Berger, T. Foote, B. Gerkey, and K. Konolige, “The office marathon: Robust navigation in an indoor office environment,” in Proceedings International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2010.

  31. B. Graf, “An adaptive guidance system for robotic walking aids,” Journal of Computing and Information Technology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 109–120, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Dzifcak, M. Scheutz, C. Baral, and P. Schermerhorn, “What to do and how to do it: Translating natural language directives into temporal and dynamic logic representation for goal management and action execution,” in Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Kobe, Japan, May 2009.

  33. T. Kollar, S. Tellex, D. Roy, and N. Roy, “Toward understanding natural language directions,” in Proceedings IEEE/ACM International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2010.

  34. C. Breazeal, D. Buchsbaum, J. Gray, D. Gatenby, and B. Blumberg, “Learning from and about others: Towards using imitation to bootstrap the social understanding of others by robots,” Artificial Life, vol. 11, no. 1–2, pp. 1–32, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. Scheutz and P. Schermerhorn, “Affective goal and task selection for social robots,” in The Handbook of Research on Synthetic Emotions and Sociable Robotics, J. Vallverdú and D. Casacuberta, Eds., 2009, pp. 74–87.

  36. L. Barsalou, C. Breazeal, and L. Smith, “Cognition as coordinated non-cognition,” Cognitive Processing, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 79–91, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. J. Fremy, F. Michaud, and M. Lauria, “Pushing a robot along — A natural interface for human-robot interaction,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (to appear), 2010, p. To be published.

  38. C. P. Connette, A. A. Pott, M. Hagele, and A. Verl, “Control of a pseudo-omnidirectional, non-holonomic, mobile robot based on a ICM representation in spherical coordinates,” in Proceedings of the 47th IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control, 2008, pp. 4976–4983.

  39. G. Campion, G. Bastin, and B. Andrea-Novel, “Structural properties and classification of kinematic and dynamic models of wheeled mobile robots,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 47–62, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. L. Clavien, M. Lauria, and F. Michaud, “Instantaneous center of rotation estimation of an omni-directional mobile robot,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (to appear), 2010.

  41. J. Kramer and M. Scheutz, “Robotic development environments for autonomous mobile robots: A survey,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 101–132, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. M. Quigley, B. Gerkey, K. Conley, J. Faust, T. Foote, J. Leibs, E. Berger, R. Wheeler, and A. Ng, “ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System,” in Open-Source Software Workshop of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2009.

  43. C. Cote, D. Letourneau, F. Michaud, J.-M. Valin, Y. Brosseau, C. Raievsky, M. Lemay, and V. Tran, “Code reusability tools for programming mobile robots,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2004, pp. 1820–1825.

  44. C. Santoro, “An Erlang framework for autonomous mobile robots,” in Proceedings SIGPLAN Workshop on Erlang, 2007, pp. 85–92.

  45. M. Mataric and F. Michaud, Behavior-based Systems. Handbook of Robotics, 2008.

  46. G. N. Saridis, “Intelligent robotic control,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. AC-28, no. 5, pp. 547–557, mai 1983, dans le cartable sur le Contrôle Intelligent.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. R. C. Arkin, Behavior-Based Robotics. The MIT Press, 1998.

  48. M. J. Matari¢, “Reinforcement learning in the multi-robot domain,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 4, no. 1, January 1997.

  49. F. Michaud, G. Lachiver, and C. T. L. Dinh, “Architectural methodology based on intentional configuration of behaviors,” Computational Intelligence, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 132–156, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. P. Pirjanian, “Multiple objective behavior-based control,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 31, no. 1–2, pp. 53–60, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. R. C. Beck, Motivation. Theories and Principles. Prentice Hall, 1983.

  52. E. Beaudry, F. Michaud, and F. Kabanza, “Reactive planning as a motivational source in a behavior-based architecture,” in Proceedings IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2008, pp. 1242–1247.

  53. A. K. McCallum, “Hidden state and reinforcement learning with instance-based state identification,” IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B: Cybernetics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 464–473, June 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. F. Michaud and M. J. Matari¢, “Learning from history for behaviorbased mobile robots in non-stationary environments,” Special Issue on Learning in Autonomous Robots, Machine Learning/Autonomous Robots, vol. 31/5, pp. 141–167/335–354, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  55. F. Michaud and M. Mataric, “Representation of behavioral history for learning in nonstationary conditions,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. D. O. Hebb, The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. Wiley, New York, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  57. G. Mandler, Mind and Body: Psychology of Emotion and Stress. W. W. Norton, New York and London, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  58. J. E. Stets, Emotions and Sentiments, J. D. DeLamater, Ed. Handbook of Social Psychology, 2003.

  59. C. Raievsky and F. Michaud, “Improving situated agents adaptability using Interruption Theory of Emotions,” in Proceedings International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, 2008, pp. 301–310.

  60. D. E. Broadbent, Perception and Communication. Pergamon Press, Londres, UK, 1958.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  61. J. Deutch and D. Deutch, “Comments on “selective attention: Perception or response ?” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 19, pp. 362–363, 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. —, “Attention: Some theoretical considerations,” Psychological Review, vol. 70, pp. 80–90, 1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. N. Lavie, “Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 451–468, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  64. —, “Distracted and confused ?: Selective attention under load,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 75–82, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. J.-M. Valin, F. Michaud, and J. Rouat, “Robust localization and tracking of simultaneous moving sound sources using beamforming and particle filtering,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems Journal, vol. 55, pp. 216–228, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. J.-M. Valin, S. Yamamoto, J. Rouat, F. Michaud, K. Nakadai, and H. Okuno, “Robust recognition of simultaneous speech by a mobile robot,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 742–752, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. W. Meeussen, M. Wise, S. Glaser, S. Chitta, C. McGann, P. Mihelich, E. Marder-Eppstein, M. Muja, V. Eruhimov, T. Foote, J. Hsu, R. Rusu, B. Marthi, G. Bradski, K. Konolige, B. Gerkey, and E. Berger, “Autonomous door opening and plugging in with a personal robot,” in Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2010.

  68. L. Takayama, “Toward a science of robotics: Goals and standards for experimental research,” in Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS)Workshop on Good ExperimentalMethodology in Robotics, 2009.

  69. A. Tashkkori and C. Teddlie, MixedMethodology. Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks (Cal.), Sage Publications, 1998.

  70. J. E. Laird, R. E. Wray, R. P. Marinier, and P. Langley, “Claims and challenges in evaluating human-level intelligent systems,” in Proceedings Artificial General Intelligence, 2009.

  71. M. Shaw, “What makes good research in software engineering?” in Proceedings European Joint Conference on Theory and Practice of Software, 2002.

  72. F. Michaud, P. Boissy, D. Labonté, S. Brière, K. Perreault, H. Corriveau, A. Grant, M. Lauria, R. Cloutier, M.-A. Roux, D. Iannuzzi, M.-P. Royer, F. Ferland, F. Pomerleau, and D. Létourneau, “Exploratory design and evaluation of a homecare teleassistive mobile robotic system,” Mechatronics, Special Issue on Design and Control Methodologies in Telerobotics, 2010.

  73. T. Salter, F. Michaud, and H. Larouche, “How wild is wild? A taxonomy to categorize child-robot interaction,” International Journal of Social Robotics, Special Issue on Human-Robot Interaction, 2010.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to François Michaud.

Additional information

F. Michaud holds the Canada Research Chair (CRC) in Mobile Robotics and Autonomous Intelligent Systems. Support for this work is provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Canada Research Chair program and the Canadian Foundation for Innovation.

About this article

Cite this article

Michaud, F., Ferland, F., Létourneau, D. et al. Toward autonomous, compliant, omnidirectional humanoid robots for natural interaction in real-life settings. Paladyn 1, 57–65 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13230-010-0003-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13230-010-0003-3

Keywords

Navigation