Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of two plant extracts and Lactobacillus fermentum on colonization of gastrointestinal tract by Salmonella enterica var. Düsseldorf in chicks

  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to published data, it is well known that essential oils from plants possess antimicrobial activity against a wide range of pathogens, including Salmonella strains. The influence of the administration of essential oils from oregano (Origanum vulgare) and thyme (Thymus vulgaris) as well as Lactobacillus fermentum on crop, caecum, liver and spleen colonization by Salmonella enterica var. Düsseldorf in chicks was investigated in this study. For the experiment, one hundred 1-day old chicks were used, and they were divided into four groups: (i) untreated (C); (ii) treated with L. fermentum (L); (iii) treated with a mixture of oregano and thyme essential oils (OT); and (iv) treated with a combination of L. fermentum and a mixture of oregano and thyme essential oils (LOT). Essential oils from oregano and thyme were mixed with commercial poultry diet, which was offered ad libitum to chicks in appertaining groups. L. fermentum was added daily to drinking water. After 3 days all the chicks were challenged orally with S. enterica var. Düsseldorf. The crops, ceca, spleens and livers of the birds were examined for S. enterica var. Düsseldorf colonization 5 days after the challenge. Our results showed that a combined administration of L. fermentum and essential oils (oregano and thyme) in group with combined application of essential oils and lactobacillus strain reduced the percentage of colonized crops and ceca when compared to the control group without any treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barak, V., Halperin, T. & Kalickman, I. 2001. The effect of Sambucol, a black elderberry-based, natural product, on the production of human cytokines. Eur. Cytokine Netw. 12: 290–296.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, K., Garbe, D. & Surburg, H. 2001. Common fragrance and flavor materials: preparation, properties and uses. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 293 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuchat, L.R. 1994. Antimicrobial properties of spices and their essential oils, pp. 167–179. In: Dillon, V.M. & Board, R.G. (eds) Natural Antimicrobial Systems and Food Preservation, CAB International, Wallingford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, S. & Schiffrin, E.J. 2003. Intestinal microflora and homeostasis of the mucosal immune response: implications for probiotic bacteria? Curr. Iss. Intest. Microbiol. 4: 53–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, C.F., Hammer, K.A. & Riley, T.V. 1996. In vitro activity of the essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia against Streptococcus spp. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 37: 1177–1181.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavazzoni, V., Adami, A. & Castrovilli, C. 1998. Performance of broiler chickens supplemented with Bacillus coagulans as probiotic. Br. Poult. Sci. 39: 526–529.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.P., Chang, J.Y., Wang, F.Y. & Change, J.G. 1995. The effect of Chinese medicinal herb Zingiberis rhizoma extract on cytokine secretion by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J. Ethnopharmacol. 11: 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chateau, N., Castellanos, I. & Deschamps, S.M. 1983. Distribution of pathogen inhibition in the Lactobacillus isolates of a commercial probiotic consortium. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 74: 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrier, D.E., Nisbet, D.J., Scanlan, C.M., Hollister, A.G. & DeLoach, J.R. 1994. Inhibition of Salmonella enteritidis cecal and organ colonization in Leghorn chicks by a defined culture of cecal bacteria and dietary lactose. J. Food Prot. 56: 377–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, M.M. 1999. Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12: 564–582.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deans, S.G. & Ritchie, G. 1987. Antibacterial properties of plant essential oils. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 5: 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorman H.J.D. & Deans, S.G. 2000. Antimicrobial agents from plants: antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils. J. Appl. Microbiol. 88: 308–316.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elgayyar, M., Draughon, F.A., Golden, D.A. & Mount, J.R. 2001. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils from plants against selected pathogenic and saprophytic microorganisms. J. Food Prot. 64: 1019–1024.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, W.N. & Cole, D.J.A. (eds) 1994. The Living Gut: An Introduction to Microorganisms in Nutrition. Context, Dungannon, Northern Ireland, 220 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R. 1986. Probiotics. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 61: 1S–7S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, K.A., Carson, C.F. & Riley, T.V. 1999. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other plant extracts. J. Appl. Microbiol. 86: 985–990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, A., Jr., Corrier, D.E., Ziprin, R.L., Spates, G.E. & DeLoach, J.R. 1991. Comparison of the efficacy of cultures of cecal anaerobes as inocula to reduce Salmonella typhimurium colonization in chicks with or without dietary lactose. Poult. Sci. 70: 67–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jamroz, D. & Kamel, C. 2002. Plant extracts enhance broiler performance. J. Anim. Sci. 80(Suppl. 1): 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan, P., Binh, T. & Benno, Y. 2003. Impact of two probiotic Lactobacillus strains feeding on fecal lactobacilli and weight gains in chickens. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 49: 29–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, B.M. & Reynolds, R.J. 1984. Progress in essential oils. Perfumer and Flavorist 9: 23–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.W., Everts, H. & Beynen, A.C. 2004. Essential oils in broiler nutrition. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 3: 738–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.W., Everts, H., Kappert, H.J., Frehner, M., Losa, R. & Beynen, A.C. 2003. Effects of dietary essential oil components on growth performance, digestive enzymes and lipid metabolism in female broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 44: 450–457.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lis-Balchin M. & Deans, S.G. 1997. Bioactivity of selected plant essential oils against Listeria monocytogenes. J. Appl. Microbiol. 82: 759–762.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, S. 2000a. Antibiotics are not only growth promoters. World Poult. 16: 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, S. 2000b. Nutraceuticals-alternatives to antibiotics. World Poult. 16: 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namkung, H., Li, M., Gong, J., Yu, H., Cottrill, M. & DeLange, C.F.M. 2004. Impact of feeding blends of organic acids and herbal extracts on growth performance, gut microbiota and digestive function in newly weaned pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84: 697–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, J.A. & Burkholder, K.M. 2003. Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poult. Sci. 82: 627–631.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pattnaik, S., Subramanyam, V.R., Kole, C.R. & Sahoo, S. 1995. Antibacterial activity of essential oils from Cymbopogon: inter-and intra-specific differences. Microbios 84: 239–245.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M., Galletti, G.C., Bocchini, P. & Carnacini, A. 1998. Essential oil chemical composition of wild populations of Italian oregano spice (Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum (Link) letswaart): a preliminary evaluation of their use in chemotaxonomy by cluster analysis: 1. Inflorescences. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46: 3741–3746.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffrin, E.J. & Blum, S. 2002. Interactions between the microbiota and the intestinal mucosa. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. (56Suppl 3): S60–S64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Senatore, F. 1996. Influence of harvesting time on yield and composition of the essential oil of a thyme (Thymus pulegioides L.) growing wild in Campania (Southern Italy). J. Agric. Food Chem. 44: 1327–1332.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Servin, A.L. 2004. Antagonistic activities of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against microbial pathogens. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 28: 405–440.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Si, W., Gong, J., Tsao, R., Zhou, T., Yu, H., Poppe, C., Johnson, R. & Du, Z. 2006. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and structurally related synthetic food additives towards selected pathogenic and beneficial gut bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 100: 296–305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skandamis, P.N. & Nychas, G.J.E. 2001. Effect of oregano essential oil on microbiological and physico-chemical attributes of minced meat stored in air and modified atmospheres. J. Appl. Microbiol. 9: 1011–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Palmer, A., Stewart, J. & Fyfe, L. 1998. Antimicrobial properties of plant essential oils and essences against five important food-borne pathogens. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 26: 118–122.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tellez, G., Petrone, V.M., Escorcia, M., Morishita, T.Y., Cobb, C.W. & Villasenor, L. 2001. Evaluation of avianspecific probiotic and Salmonella enteritidis-, Salmonella typhimurium- and Salmonella heidelberg-specific antibodies on cecal colonization and organ invasion of Salmonella enteritidis in broilers. J. Food Prot. 64: 287–291.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tzakou, O., Pitarokili, D., Chinou, I.B. & Harvala, C. 2001. Composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Salvia ringens. Plant. Med. 67: 81–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jana Koščová.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koščová, J., Nemcová, R., Gancarčíková, S. et al. Effect of two plant extracts and Lactobacillus fermentum on colonization of gastrointestinal tract by Salmonella enterica var. Düsseldorf in chicks. Biologia 61, 775–778 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-006-0156-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-006-0156-z

Key words

Navigation