Abstract
The process of CFD model application for atmospheric dispersion modeling is presented. Increasing the CPU power opens new possibilities of the CFD approach application for consequence analysis in real complex urban environments. As successful CFD simulation is directly dependent on the quality and complexity of the computational mesh, a new methodology of transferring the Geographic Information System (GIS) data to the computational mesh can be utilized. A user software for importing and manipulation with the GIS data and their subsequent transfer to an instructional file for the generation of the computational mesh was prepared and tested. The introduced methodology is relatively simple and it requires only a small amount of input data. The process of creating a computational mesh is very straightforward and fast, which enables the application of CFD modeling in urban environments in all fields of engineering applications in safety analysis. Several recommendations concerning proper definition of boundary conditions for atmospheric dispersion modeling were summarized. The presented approach was tested on a realistic case study of liquefied chlorine release in a real town. Results obtained by the CFD approach were compared with those obtained by a simpler but standard integral model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Institute of Chemical Engineers (2000). Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY, USA: American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
Argyropoulos, C. D., Sideris, G. M., Christolis, M. N., Nivolianitou, Z., & Markatos, N. C. (2010). Modelling pollutants dispersion and plume rise from large hydrocarbon tank fires in neutrally stratified atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment, 44, 803–813. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.11.034.
Blocken, B., Stathopoulos, T., & Carmeliet, J. (2007). CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems. Atmospheric Environment, 41, 238–252. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.019.
Blocken, B., Janssen, W. D., & van Hooff, T. (2012). CFD simulation for pedestrian wind comfort and wind safety in urban areas: General decision framework and case study for the Eindhoven University campus. Environmental Modelling & Software, 30, 15–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.009.
Burman, J. (1998). An evaluation of topographical effects on neutral and heavy-gas dispersion with a CFD model. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 74–76, 315–325. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105 (98)00028-2.
Fluent Inc. (2005). Fluent: User’s guide. Lebanon, NH, USA.
Garcia Sagrado, A. P., van Beeck, J., Rambaud, P., & Olivari, D. (2002). Numerical and experimental modelling of pollutant dispersion in a street canyon. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 90, 321–339. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(01)00215-x.
Gousseau, P., Blocken, B., Stathopoulos, T., & van Heijst, G. J. F. (2011). CFD simulation of near-field pollutant dispersion on a high-resolution grid: A case study by LES and RANS for a building group in downtown Montreal. Atmospheric Environment, 45, 428–438. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.065.
Han, J., Arya, S. P., Shen, S. H., & Lin, Y. L. (2000). An estimation of turbulent kinetic energy and energy dissipation rate based on atmospheric boundary layer similarity theory: Hampton, VA, USA: NASA.
Hanna, S. R., Tehranian, S., Carissimo, B., Macdonald, R. W., & Lohner, R. (2002). Comparisons of model simulations with observations of mean flow and turbulence within simple obstacle arrays. Atmospheric Environment, 36, 5067–5079. DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00566-6.
Hanna, S. R., Hansen, O. R., Ichard, M., & Strimaitis, D. (2009). CFD model simulation of dispersion from chlorine railcar releases in industrial and urban areas. Atmospheric Environment, 43, 262–270. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.081.
Hargreaves, D. M., & Wright, N. G. (2007). On the use of the k-ɛ model in commercial CFD software to model the neutral atmospheric boundary layer. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 95, 355–369. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2006.08.002.
Havens, J. A., & Spicer, T. O. (1985). Development of an atmospheric dispersion model for heavier-than-air gas mixtures. Volume 2. Laboratory Calm Air Heavy Gas Dispersion Experiments. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA. (NTIS No. DTCG23-80-C-20029)
Kim, S. E., & Boysan, F. (1999). Application of CFD to environmental flows. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 81, 145–158. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(99)00013-6.
Kiša, M., & Jelemensky, Ľ. (2009). CFD dispersion modelling for emergency preparadnes. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22, 97–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2008.09.013.
Koutsourakis, N., Venetsanos, A. G., & Bartzis, J. G. (2012). LES modelling of hydrogen release and accumulation within a non-ventilated ambient pressure garage using the ADREAHF CFD code. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37, 17426–17435. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.146.
Labovsky, J., & Jelemensky, Ľ. (2010). CFD simulations of ammonia dispersion using ”dynamic” boundary conditions. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 88, 243–252. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2010.03.001.
Labovsky, J., & Jelemensky, Ľ. (2011). Verification of CFD pollution dispersion modelling based on experimental data. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 24, 166–177. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2010.12.005.
Letzel, M. O., Krane, M., & Raasch, S. (2008). High resolution urban large-eddy simulation studies from street canyon to neighbourhood scale. Atmospheric Environment, 42, 8770–8784. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.08.001.
Mannan, S. (Ed.) (2005). Lee’s loss prevention in the process industries: Hazard identification, assessment, and control (3rd ed., Vol. 1). Burlington, MA, USA: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
McHugh, C. A., Carruthers, D. J., & Edmunds, H. A. (1997). ADMS and ADMS-Urban. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 8, 438–440. DOI: 10.1504/ijep.1997.028193.
Middha, P., & Hansen, O. R. (2009). CFD simulation study to investigate the risk from hydrogen vehicles in tunnels. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34, 5875–5886. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.02.004.
Nozu, T., & Tamura, T. (2012). LES of turbulent wind and gas dispersion in a city. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 104-106, 492–499. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2012.02.024.
Papanikolaou, E., Venetsanos, A. G., Cerchiara, G. M., Carcassi, M., & Markatos, N. (2011). CFD simulations on small hydrogen releases inside a ventilated facility and assessment of ventilation efficiency. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 2597–2605. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.119.
Pontiggia, M., Derudi, M., Alba, M., Scaioni, M., & Rota, R. (2010). Hazardous gas releases in urban areas: Assessment of consequences through CFD modelling. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 176, 589–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.070.
Reichrath, S., & Davies, T. W. (2002). Computational fluid dynamics simulations and validation of the pressure distribution on the roof of a commercial multi-span Venlotype glasshouse. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 90, 139–149. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(01)00184-2.
Scargiali, F., Di Rienzo, E., Ciofalo, M., Grisafi, F., & Brucato, A. (2005). Heavy gas dispersion modelling over a topographically complex mesoscale: A CFD based approach. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 83, 242–256. DOI: 10.1205/psep.04073.
Sklavounos, S., & Rigas, F. (2004). Validation of turbulence models in heavy gas dispersion over obstacles. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 108, 9–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.01.005.
Wieringa, J. (1992). Updating the Davenport roughness classification. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 41, 357–368. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(92)90434-c.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Labovský, J., Jelemenský, Ľ. CFD-based atmospheric dispersion modeling in real urban environments. Chem. Pap. 67, 1495–1503 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11696-013-0388-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11696-013-0388-7