Skip to main content
Log in

Compression evaluation of surgery video recordings retaining diagnostic credibility (compression evaluation of surgery video)

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Opto-Electronics Review

Abstract

Wider dissemination of medical digital video libraries is affected by two correlated factors, resource effective content compression that directly influences its diagnostic credibility. It has been proved that it is possible to meet these contradictory requirements halfway for long-lasting and low motion surgery recordings at compression ratios close to 100 (bronchoscopic procedures were a case study investigated). As the main supporting assumption, it has been accepted that the content can be compressed as far as clinicians are not able to sense a loss of video diagnostic fidelity (a visually lossless compression).

Different market codecs were inspected by means of the combined subjective and objective tests toward their usability in medical video libraries. Subjective tests involved a panel of clinicians who had to classify compressed bronchoscopic video content according to its quality under the bubble sort algorithm. For objective tests, two metrics (hybrid vector measure and hosaka Plots) were calculated frame by frame and averaged over a whole sequence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.T.C. Wong, and D. Tjandra, “A digital library for biomedical imaging on the Internet”, IEEE Commun. Mag. 37, 84–91 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Tadeusiewicz and M.R. Ogiela, Medical image understanding technology. Artificial intelligence and soft-computing for image understanding, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Miron, and E.Z. Blumenthal, “Bridging analog and digital video in the surgical setting”, J. Cataract. Refr. Surg. 29, 1874–1877 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. N.M. Hamilton, I. Frade, P. Duguid, J. Furnace, and A.D. Kindley, “Digital video for networked CAL delivery”, J. Audiov. Media. Med. 18, 59–63 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S.A. Kumar, and H. Pal, “Digital video recording of cardiac surgical procedures”, Ann. Thorac. Surg. 77, 1063–1065 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P.A. Reynolds, and R. Mason, “On-line video media for continuing professional development in dentistry”, Comput. Educ. 39, 65–98 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S.M. Green, D. Voegeli, M. Harrison, J. Phillips, J. Knowles, M. Weaver, and K. Shephard, “Evaluating the use of streaming video to support student learning in a first-year life sciences course for student nurses”, Nurs. Educ. Today 23, 255–261 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C.D. Wright, Digital Library Technology Trends, Sun Microsystems Inc., 2002.

  9. P.S. Greene, “Streaming video for the annals Internet readers”, Ann. Thorac. Surg. 77, 1063–1065 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Strom, “Overcoming barriers for teaching and learning”, in Proc. Int. Symp. Educational Conferencing, Banff, 2002.

  11. R.M. Lavitan, T.S. Goldman, D.A. Bryan, F. Shofer, and A. Harlich, “Training with video imaging improves the initial intubation success rates of paramedic trainees in an operating room setting”, Ann. Emerg. Med. 37, 46–50 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Leung, G. D’Onofrio, B. Duncan, R. Trepp, N. Vasques, and J. Schriver, “Apply streaming audio and video technology to enhance emergency physician education”, Acad. Emerg. Med. 9, 1059 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J.M. Wiecha, R. Gramling, P. Joachim, and H. Vanderschmidt, “Collaborative e-learning using streaming video and asynchronous discussion boards to teach the cognitive foundation of medical interviewing: A case study”, J. Med. Internet Res. 5, 13 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Gandsas, K. McIntire, G. Palli, and A. Park, “Live streaming video for medical education: a laboratory model”, J. Laparoendosc. Adv. A12, 377–382 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Leszczuk, “Accessing digital video libraries from mobile terminals in 3G networks”, in Proc. Advanced Technologies, Applications and Market Strategies for 3G ATAMS’2001, pp. 164–171, Kraków, 2001.

  16. A. Przelaskowski, Wavelet-based Image Data Compression (Falkowe metody kompresji danych obrazowych), Publishing House of the Warsaw University of Technology (Oficyna Wydawnicza PW), pp. 149–190, Warsaw, 2002.

  17. C. Dafonte, A. Gomez, A. Castro, and B. Arcay, “Scientific papers: a proposal for improving ICU assistance through intelligent monitoring and supervision”, Technol. Health. Care 10, 464–466, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rubis Project, Healthcare Telematics Projects, Rubis Project Final Report, pp. 17–19, Rubis Project, 2001.

  19. B. Malassagne, D. Mutter, J. Leroy, M. Smith, L. Soler, and J. Marescaux, “Teleeducation in surgery: European Institute for Telesurgery Experience”, World J. Surg. 25, 1490–1494 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Rosser, B. Herman, and C. Ehrenwerth, “An overview of video streaming on the Internet and its application to surgical education”, Surg. Endosc. 15, 624–629 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. S.A. Zollo, M.G. Kienzle, Z. Henshaw, L.G. Crist, and D.S. Wakefield, “Tele-education in a telemedicine environment: Implications for rural health care and academic medical centres”, J. Med. Syst. 23, 107–122 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M.A. Gisondi, S.V. Mahadevan, S.S. Sovndal, and G.H. Gilbert, “19 Emergency department orientation utilizing Web-based streaming video”, Acad. Emerg. Med. 10, 920 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. National Electrical Manufacturers Association, “National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM)”, in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), National Electrical Manufacturers Association, http://medical.nema.org, 2004.

  24. International Organization for Standardization, ISO/IEC 2022:1994: Information technology — Character code structure and extension techniques, pp. 47, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H.J. Lowe, “The new telemedicine paradigm: Using Internet-based multimedia electronic medical record systems to support wide-area clinical care delivery”, in Telemedicine and Telecommunications: Options for the New Century, Bethesda, 2001.

  26. M. Cuggia, F. Mougin, and P. Le Beux, “Indexing method of digital audiovisual medical resources with semantic Web integration”, Int. J. Med. Inform. 74, 169–177 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. International Organization for Standardization, ISO/IEC 15444-3:2003: Information technology — JPEG 2000 image coding system — Part 3: Motion JPEG 2000, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  28. ISO/IEC, “MPEG-1 Coding of moving pictures and associated audio for digital storage media at up to about 1.5 Mbit/s”, ISO/IEC 11172 (1993).

  29. ISO/IEC, “Information technology — Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio information: Video”, ISO/IEC 13818-2 (2002).

  30. Ii Recommendation Itu-T, Recommendation ITU-T H.262 (1995 E) i, 1995.

  31. ITU-R, “Video coding for low bit rate communication”, Recommendation ITU-R H.263, 01 (2005).

  32. W.K.H. Ho, W.K. Cheuk, and D.P.K. Lun, “Content-based scalable H.263 video coding for road traffic monitoring”, IEEE T. Multimedia 7, 615–623, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. ISO/IEC, “Information technology — coding of audio-visual objects — Part 2: Visual”, ISO/IEC 14496-2, 6 (2004).

  34. International Organization for Standardization, ISO/IEC 14496-10:2004: Information technology — Coding of audio-visual objects — Part 10: Advanced Video Coding, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  35. ITU-R, “Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services”, Recommendation ITU-R H.264, 03 (2005).

  36. A. Przelaskowski, “Vector quality measure of lossy compressed medical images”, Comput. Biol. Med. 34, 193–207 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Multimedia — Compression Algorithms and Standards, edited by W. Skarbek, Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza PLJ, 1998. (in Polish)

  38. T. Frankewitsch, S. Soehnlein, M. Mueller, and H.U. Prokosch, “Computed quality assessment of MPEG4-compressed DICOM video data”, in Connecting Medical Informatics and Bio-Informatics, Section 7: Imaging Informatics, pp. 447–452, edited by R. Engelbrecht, ENMI, 2005.

  39. D.E. Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming Volumes 1–3 Boxed Set, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  40. T.H. Cormen, C. Stein, R.L. Rivest, and Ch.E. Leiserson, Introduction to Algorithms, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2001.

  41. K. Hosaka, “A new picture quality evaluation method”, in Proc. Int. Picture Coding Symp., pp. 17–18, Tokyo, 1986.

  42. M. Miyahara, K. Kotani, and V.R. Algazi, “Objective picture quality scale (PQS) for image coding”, IEEE T. Commun. 46, 1215–1226 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Duplaga.

About this article

Cite this article

Duplaga, M., Leszczuk, M.I., Papir, Z. et al. Compression evaluation of surgery video recordings retaining diagnostic credibility (compression evaluation of surgery video). Opto-Electron. Rev. 16, 428–438 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11772-008-0041-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11772-008-0041-0

Keywords

Navigation