Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Educational assortative mating across marriage markets: Nonhispanic whites in the United States

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

Whether local marriage market conditions shape marriage behavior is a central social demographic question. Most work on this subject, however, focuses on one type of market condition—sex ratios— and on a single outcome—marital timing or sorting. We examine the impact of local marriage markets’ educational composition on educational assortative mating and on how sorting varies with age. We estimate a discrete-time competing-risks model of educational sorting outcomes, using individual data from the NLSY and community descriptors aggregated from census microdata. Results show that residents of educationally less favorable marriage markets are more likely to marry down on education, and that (for women) their chance of doing so increases with age more than for residents of more favorable markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akers, D.S. 1967. “On Measuring the Marriage Squeeze.” Demography 4:907–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P.D. 1982. “Discrete-Time Methods for the Analysis of Event Histories.” Pp. 61–98 in Sociological Methodology 1982, edited by K. Keinhardt. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1984. Event History Analysis. Beverly Hill: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, D.L. 1998. “Marital Homogamy in the United States: The Influence of Individual and Paternal Education.” Social Science Research 27:159–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.M. 1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.M., T.C. Blum, and J.E. Schwartz. 1982. “Heterogeneity and Intermarriage.” American Sociological Review 47:45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.M. and J.E. Schwartz. 1984. Crosscutting Social Circles. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D.M. and M. Barnes. 1986. “Preferences in Human Mate Selection.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50:559–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England, P. and G. Farkas. 1986. Households, Employment, and Gender. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossett, M.A. and K.J. Kiecolt. 1991. “A Methodological Review of the Sex Ratio: Alternatives for Comparative Research.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:941–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1993. “Mate Availability and Family Structure Among African Americans in U.S. Metropolitan Areas.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 55:288–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, N., C.F. Westoff, and C. Hammerslough. 1984. “Demography of the Marriage Market in the United States.” Population Index 50:5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, F.K. and J. DaVanzo. 1989. “Pathways to Independent Living in Early Adulthood: Marriage, Semiautonomy, and Premarital Residential Independence.” Demography 26:597–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hachen, D.S., Jr. 1988. “The Competing Risks Model: A Method for Analyzing Processes With Multiple Types of Events.” Sociological Methods and Research 17:21–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J.A., P.A. Blumenstein, and P. Schwartz. 1987. “Social or Evolutionary Theories? Some Observations on Preferences in Human Mate Selection.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53:194–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, M. 1991a. “Status Homogamy in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology 97:496–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1991b. “Shifting Boundaries: Trends in Religious and Educational Homogamy.” American Sociological Review 56:786–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1993. “Trends in Black/White Intermarriage.” Social Forces 72:119–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1998. “Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends.” Annual Review of Sociology 24:395–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, R.J.R. 1943. “Premarital Residential Propinquity and Ethnic Endogamy.” American Journal of Sociology 48:580–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, P.H. and K.H. Day. 1945. “Education as a Factor in Mate Selection.” American Sociological Review 10:558–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D.T. 1990. “Delayed Marriage, Marital Homogamy, and the Mate Selection Process Among White Women.” Social Science Quarterly 71:802–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D.T., R.N. Anderson, and M.D. Hayward. 1995. “Marriage Markets and Marital Choice.” Journal of Family Issues 16:412–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D.T., F.B. LeClere, and D.K. McLaughlin. 1991. “Local Marriage Markets and the Marital Behavior of Black and White Women.” American Journal of Sociology 96:843–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D.T., D.K. McLaughlin, G. Kephart, and D.J. Landry. 1992. “Race and the Retreat From Marriage: A Shortage of Marriageable Men?“ American Sociological Review 57:781–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, K.M. and S.J. South. 1996. “Contextual Influences on Young Men’s Transition to First Marriage.” Social Forces 74:1097–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mare, R.D. 1991. “Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating.” American Sociological Review 56:15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marini, M.M. 1985. “Determinants of the Timing of Adult Role Entry.” Social Science Research 14:309–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, R.T. and N.B. Tuma. 1985. “Entry Into Marriage and Parenthood by Young Men and Women: The Influence of Family Background.” Demography 22:515–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhsam, H.V. 1974. “The Marriage Squeeze.” Demography 11:291–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, V.K. 1988. “A Theory of Marriage Timing.” American Journal of Sociology 94:563–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullum, T.W. and A. Peri. 1997. “The Multivariate Analysis of Homogamy.” Presented at the annual meetings of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC.

  • Qian, Z. and S.H. Preston. 1993. “Changes in American Marriage, 1972 to 1987: Availability and Forces of Attraction by Age and Education.” American Sociological Review 58:482–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, R. 1983. “Measuring the Tightness of the Marriage Squeeze.” Demography 20:62–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1986. “A Methodological Analysis of Intergroup Marriage.” Sociological Methodology 15:49–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, R. and J.R. Kluegel. 1988. “The Widening Gap in Black and White Marriage Rates: The Impact of Population Composition and Differential Marriage Propensities.” American Sociological Review 53:895–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, R. and J. Wooldredge. 1989. “Marriage Choices in North Carolina and Virginia, 1969–71 and 1979–81.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 51:465–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, R., J. Wooldredge, and B. Thomas. 1989. “Ethnic and Educational Effects on Marriage Choice.” Social Sciences Quarterly 70:617–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, S.J. 1991. “Sociodemographic Differentials in Mate Selection Preferences.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:928–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South, S.J. and K.M. Lloyd. 1992. “Marriage Opportunities and Family Formation: Further Implications of Imbalanced Sex Ratios.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 54:440–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W.J. and K.M. Neckerman. 1986. “Poverty and Family Structure: The Widening Gap Between Evidences and Public Policy Issues.” Pp. 232–59 in Fighting Poverty: What Works and What Doesn’t, edited by S.H. Danziger and D.H. Weinberg. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, K. 1991. Event History Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Ohio State University, USA

    Susan K. Lewis

  2. Department of Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles

    Valerie K. Oppenheimer

Authors
  1. Susan K. Lewis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Valerie K. Oppenheimer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan K. Lewis.

Additional information

We wish to thank Ken Bailey, Rob Mare, Bill Mason, Michael Seltzer, Ken Sokoloff, and the Demography reviewers and editors for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, S.K., Oppenheimer, V.K. Educational assortative mating across marriage markets: Nonhispanic whites in the United States. Demography 37, 29–40 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2307/2648094

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2648094

Keywords

Search

Navigation