Skip to main content
Log in

Subsequent Cardiac and Stroke Events in Patients with Known Vascular Disease Treated with EDTA Chelation Therapy

A Retrospective Study

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine

Abstract

Context

Myocardial infarction (MI) and strokes are leading causes of death in the US. Surgical and medical treatments can be helpful, but carry risks of morbidity and mortality.

Objective

To evaluate whether cardiac events were reduced for patients with known vascular disease who were treated with intravenous ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) chelation therapy.

Design

Retrospective study with a 3-year follow-up, compared with similar patient groups by use of meta-analysis.

Population and setting

A total of 220 consecutive patients with known vascular disease were treated with chelation therapy during 1992–2001. Eight outpatient centres were included: five from the US and one each from Denmark, the Netherlands and Brazil. Average patient age was 64 years, 72.3% were males and 18.2% were smokers. Average number of treatments was 58.

Main outcome measures

MI, stroke and death from any cause were primary outcome measures. Secondary measures were resolution of symptoms and need for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Results

According to the meta-analysis, expected outcomes in a 3-year follow-up period for 220 patients with coronary artery disease treated only with conventional therapies would be 15 MIs and six deaths. There were no deaths and no MIs in this group of patients who received chelation therapy. Four patients had strokes but recovered well. There were two angioplasties and six CABG procedures. Compared with similar patient populations treated with conventional therapies, patients who also were chelated had a 93.6% lesser need for angioplasty and a 62.5% reduced need for CABG. Of the patients that initiated treatment with symptoms, 68.7% had complete resolution of symptoms.

Conclusions

This study indicates that the administration of intravenous EDTA chelation therapy for patients with vascular disease resulted in fewer subsequent cardiac events than primary treatment with CABG, angioplasty or conventional medical therapy. EDTA chelation therapy for vascular disease is a reasonable, off-label adjunct, especially for patients who refuse or are not eligible for surgery. Clinical trials such as the Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT) are needed for definitive proof.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV
Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lamas GA, Ackerman A. Clinical evaluation of chelation therapy; is there any wheat amidst the chaff? Am Heart J 2000; 140: 4–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin J-L, Lin-Tan D-T, Hsu K-H, et al. Environmental lead exposure and progression of renal diseases in-patients without diabetes. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 277–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nash D, Magder L, Lustberg M, et al. Blood lead, blood pressure, and hypertension in perimenopausal and post menopausal women. JAMA 2003; 289: 1523–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cranton EM. A textbook on EDTA chelation therapy. 2nd ed. Charlottesville (VA): Hampton Roads, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  5. Olmstead SF. A critical review of EDTA chelation therapy in the treatment of occlusive vascular disease. Klamath Falls (OR): Merle West Medical Center Foundation, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chappell LT, Stahl JP. The correlation between EDTA chelation therapy and improvement in cardiovascular function: a meta-analysis. J Adv Med 1993; 6: 139–63

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hancke C, Flytlie K. Benefits of EDTA chelation therapy in arteriosclerosis: a retrospective study of 470 patients. J Adv Med 1993; 6: 161–71

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hancke C. The long-term effect of chelation therapy: a 6–12 year follow-up of a 1993 study. Clin Pract Altern Med 2000; 1: 158–63

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guldager B, Jelnes R, Jorgensen SJ, et al. EDTA treatment of intermittent claudication: a double-blind, placebo controlled study. J Intern Med 1992; 231: 261–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. van Rij AM, Soloman C, Packer SGK, et al. Chelation therapy for intermittent claudication: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Circulation 1994; 90: 1194–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Knudtsen ML, Wyse DG, Gailbraith PD, et al. Chelation therapy for ischemic heart disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 287: 481–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. National Institutes of Health. NIH launches large clinical trial on EDTA chelation therapy for coronary artery disease [online]. Available from URL: http://nccam.nih.gov/chelation/pressrelease.htm [Accessed 2005 Jul 28]

  13. Zeger SL, Liang K-Y. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 1986; 42: 121–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986; 73: 13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Folland ED, Hartigan PM, Parisi AF. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy for stable angina pectoris: outcomes for patients with double-vessel versus single-vessel coronary artery disease in a veterans affairs cooperative randomized trial. Veterans affairs ACME investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 1505–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy for angina: the second Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA-2) trial. RITA-2 trial participants. Lancet 1997; 350: 461–8

  17. Pitt B, Waters D, Brown WV, et al. Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy compared with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease: Atorvastatin versus Revascularization Treatment Investigators. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 70–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. King SB, Lembo NJ, Kosinski AS, et al. A randomized trial comparing coronary angioplasty with coronary bypass surgery: Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST). N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1044–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hueb W, Arie S, Oliveira SA, et al. The Medicine, Angioplasty or Surgery Study (MASS): a prospective randomized trial for single proximal left anterior descending artery stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 1600–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Goy J-J, Eeckhout E, Burnand B, et al. Coronary angioplasty versus left internal mammary grafting for isolated proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis. Lancet 1994; 343: 1449–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. Lancet 1993; 341: 573–80

  22. Cranton EM, Frackelton JP. Free radical pathology on age-associated diseases; treatment with EDTA chelation nutrition and antioxidants. J Holist Med 1984; 6: 6–37

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gutteridge JMC. Ferrous-salt-promoted damage to deoxyribose and benzoate, the increased effectiveness of hydroxy-radical scavengers in the presence of EDTA. Biochem J 1987; 243: 709–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zylke J. Studying oxygen’s life-and-death roles if taken from or reintroduced into tissue. JAMA 1988; 259: 964–5

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kindness G, Frackelton JP. Effect of ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) on platelet aggregation in human blood. J Adv Med 1989; 2: 519–30

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cranton EM. Kidney effects of ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA): a literature review. J Holist Med 1982; 4: 152–7

    Google Scholar 

  27. McDonagh EW, Rudolph CJ, Cheraskin E. The effect of EDTA chelation therapy plus supportive multivitamin-trace mineral supplementation upon renal function: a study in serum creatinine. J Adv Med 1989; 2: 235–44

    Google Scholar 

  28. Oliver LD, Mehta R, Sarles HE. Acute renal failure following administration of ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA). Tex Med 1984; 80: 40–2

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the following people who made major contributions to the gathering and organising of data for this project: Elizabeth Angus, Larry Mervine, Lisa Wellinghoff and Luo Junxiang.

The statistical analysis was performed by Rakesh Shukla, Professor of Biostatistics and Director of the Center for Biostatistical Services at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center.

We are grateful for financial support from the following organisations: American Institute of Medical Preventics, Frederick S. Upton Foundation, National Heart Council, Health Research Foundation, Foundation for Research and Development of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Gordon Research Institute, Trillium Health Center, Magnetico, Haelen Products, Apothecure Pharmacy, Douglas Labs and Longevity Plus.

None of the authors has any financial interest in companies that produce and sell EDTA, nor any potential conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the contents of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Terry Chappell.

Additional information

Deceased. Formerly in Private Practice, Youngstown, Ohio, USA

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chappell, L.T., Shukla, R., Yang, J. et al. Subsequent Cardiac and Stroke Events in Patients with Known Vascular Disease Treated with EDTA Chelation Therapy. Evid-Based-Integrative-Med 2, 27–35 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2165/01197065-200502010-00007

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/01197065-200502010-00007

Keywords

Navigation