Skip to main content
Log in

User Experience with an Oral Contraceptive Containing Ethinylestradiol 30μg and Drospirenone 3mg (Yasmin®) in Clinical Practice

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Treatments in Endocrinology

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the reasons why women chose the combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing ethinylestradiol 30μg and drospirenone 3mg, their perception of it, and their satisfaction with it when used in clinical practice.

Methods: This was an uncontrolled survey of women using the ethinylestradiol 30μg/drospirenone 3mg COC in 15 European countries from September to December 2004. The women were invited to participate in this study by their general practitioner, gynecologist, or other family planning provider. The women were asked to complete a four-part questionnaire retrospectively about why they chose the ethinylestradiol 30μg/drospirenone 3mg COC and their experiences with it.

Results: A total of 10 947 questionnaires were returned and included in the analysis. Of the respondents, 7694 (70%) had switched to the ethinylestradiol 30μg/drospirenone 3mg COC from other oral contraceptives. About two-thirds (6797 [62%]) of respondents stated that they felt better while using the ethinylestradiol 30μg/drospirenone 3mg COC compared with the time before they started using it. The severity of premenstrual symptoms including depressed mood, irritability, breast tenderness or pain, abdominal bloating or swelling, skin and hair problems, and swelling of the extremities all improved during treatment with the ethinylestradiol 30μg/drospirenone 3mg COC. Overall, 10 441 (95%) respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with the ethinylestradiol 30μg/drospirenone 3mg COC and 9016 (82%) would recommend it to a friend.

Conclusion: The additional non-contraceptive benefits of the ethinylestradiol 30μg/drospirenone 3mg COC are important factors that influence patients’ perceptions of this oral contraceptive and their satisfaction with its use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

  2. The full questionnaire is available as supplementary material at http://endocrinology.adisonline.com.

References

  1. Skouby SO. Contraceptive use and behavior in the 21st century: a comprehensive study across five European countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2004; 9(2): 57–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS, Long S. Unintended pregnancies and use, misuse and discontinuation of oral contraceptives. J Reprod Med 1995 May; 40(5): 355–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS. Oral contraceptive discontinuation: a prospective evaluation of frequency and reasons. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 577–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Potter LS. Oral contraceptive compliance and its role in the effectiveness of the method. New York: Raven Press Ltd, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  5. Potter L, Oakley D, de Leon-Wong E, et al. Measuring compliance among oral contraceptive users. Fam Plann Perspect 1996; 28(4): 154–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS, Burnhill MS. Compliance, counseling and satisfaction with oral contraceptives: a prospective evaluation. Fam Plann Perspect 1998; 30(2): 89–92, 104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Heinemann LA, Thiel C, Assmann A, et al. Frequency and reasons for switching/ stopping use of oral contraceptives: results of the German Cohort Study on Women Health. Zentralbl Gynakol 2001; 123(10): 568–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Krattenmacher R. Drospirenone: pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of a unique progestogen. Contraception 2000 Jul; 62(1): 29–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Foidart J-M, Wuttke W, Bouw GM, et al. A comparative investigation of contraceptive reliability, cycle control and tolerance of two monophasic oral contraceptives containing either drospirenone or desogestrel. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2000; 5(2): 124–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Huber J, Foidart JM, Wuttke W, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of a monophasic oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and drospirenone. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2000; 5(1): 25–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Parsey KS, Pong A. An open-label, multicenter study to evaluate Yasmin, a lowdose combination oral contraceptive containing drospirenone, a new progestogen. Contraception 2000; 61(2): 105–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thorneycroft IH, Gollnick H, Schellschmidt I. Superiority of a combined oral contraceptive containing drospirenone to a triphasic preparation containing norgestimate in acne treatment. Cutis 2004; 74: 123–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van Vloten WA, van Haselen CW, van Zuuren EJ, et al. The effect of 2 combined oral contraceptives containing either drospirenone or cyproterone acetate on acne and seborrhea. Cutis 2002; 69Suppl. 4: 2–15

    Google Scholar 

  14. Medical Outcomes Trust and QualityMetric Incorporated. SF-36 health survey [online]. Available from URL: http://www.sf-36.org/tools/pdf/SF-36vl_Standard_Sample. pdf [Accessed 2006 Apr 11]

  15. Poindexter AN, Burkman R, Fisher AC, et al. Cycle control, tolerability, and satisfaction among women switching from 30–35 microg ethinyl estradiol-containing oral contraceptives to the triphasic norgestimate/25 microg ethinyl estradiol-containing oral contraceptive Ortho Tri-Cyclen LO. Int J Fertil Womens Med 2003; 48(4): 163–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sulak P, Lippman J, Siu C, et al. Clinical comparison of triphasic norgestimate/35 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and monophasic norethindrone acetate/20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol: cycle control, lipid effects, and user satisfaction. Contraception 1999; 59(3): 161–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Boschitsch E, Skarabis H, Wuttke W, et al. The acceptability of a novel oral contraceptive containing drospirenone and its effect on well-being. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2000; 5Suppl. 3: 34–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Freeman EW, Kroll R, Rapkin A, et al. Evaluation of a unique oral contraceptive in the treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2001; 10(6): 561–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brown C, Ling F, Wan J. A new monophasic oral contraceptive containing drospirenone: effect on perimenstrual symptoms. J Reprod Med 2002; 47(1): 14–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by Schering AG, Berlin, Germany. Editorial assistance for the development of this manuscript was provided by Richard Glover, with the financial support of Schering AG. Dr Schultz-Zehden has received honoraria from Schering AG. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schultz-Zehden, B., Boschitsch, E. User Experience with an Oral Contraceptive Containing Ethinylestradiol 30μg and Drospirenone 3mg (Yasmin®) in Clinical Practice. Mol Diag Ther 5, 251–256 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2165/00024677-200605040-00006

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00024677-200605040-00006

Keywords

Navigation