Drug Safety

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 319–328

Patient Experiences of Serious Adverse Drug Reactions and Their Attitudes to Medicines

A Qualitative Study of Survivors of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis in the UK
  • Tehreem F. Butt
  • Anthony R. Cox
  • Helen Lewis
  • Robin E. Ferner
Original Research Article

DOI: 10.2165/11588460-000000000-00000

Cite this article as:
Butt, T.F., Cox, A.R., Lewis, H. et al. Drug-Safety (2011) 34: 319. doi:10.2165/11588460-000000000-00000

Abstract

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) cause significant morbidity and mortality and account for around 6.5% of hospital admissions. Patient experiences of serious ADRs and their long-term impact on patients’ lives, including their influence on current attitudes towards medicines, have not been previously explored.

Objective: The aim of the study was to explore the experiences, beliefs, and attitudes of survivors of serious ADRs, using drug-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) as a paradigm.

Methods: A retrospective, qualitative study was undertaken using detailed semi-structured interviews. Fourteen adult survivors of SJS and TEN, admitted to two teaching hospitals in the UK, one the location of a tertiary burns centre, were interviewed. Interview transcripts were independently analysed by three different researchers and themes emerging from the text identified.

Results: All 14 patients were aware that their condition was drug induced, and all but one knew the specific drug(s) implicated. Several expressed surprise at the perceived lack of awareness of the ADR amongst healthcare professionals, and described how the ADR was mistaken for another condition.

Survivors believed that causes of the ADR included (i) being given too high a dose of the drug; (ii) medical staff ignoring existing allergies; and (iii) failure to monitor blood tests. Only two believed that the reaction was unavoidable. Those who believed that the condition could have been avoided had less trust in healthcare professionals. The ADR had a persisting impact on their current lives physically and psychologically. Many now avoided medicines altogether and were fearful of becoming ill enough to need them.

Conclusions: Life-threatening ADRs continued to affect patients’ lives long after the event. Patients’ beliefs regarding the cause of the ADR differed, and may have influenced their trust in healthcare professionals and medicines. We propose that clear communication during the acute phase of a serious ADR may therefore be important.

Supplementary material

40264_2012_34040319_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (25 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 25 KB.

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tehreem F. Butt
    • 1
  • Anthony R. Cox
    • 2
    • 4
  • Helen Lewis
    • 3
  • Robin E. Ferner
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Clinical and Experimental MedicineUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
  2. 2.Aston Pharmacy SchoolAston UniversityUK
  3. 3.Department of DermatologyUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS TrustUK
  4. 4.West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug ReactionsCity HospitalBirminghamUK
  5. 5.Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Clinical Investigation UnitQueen Elizabeth HospitalEdgbastonUK