Abstract
In general, elite climbers have been characterised as small in stature, with low percentage body fat and body mass. Currently, there are mixed conclusions surrounding body mass and composition, potentially because of variable subject ability, method of assessment and calculation. Muscular strength and endurance in rock climbers have been primarily measured on the forearm, hand and fingers via dynamometry. When absolute hand strength was assessed, there was little difference between climbers and the general population. When expressed in relation to body mass, elite-level climbers scored significantly higher, highlighting the potential importance of low body mass.
Rock climbing is characterised by repeated bouts of isometric contractions. Hand grip endurance has been measured by both repeated isometric contractions and sustained contractions, at a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction. Exercise times to fatigue during repeated isometric contractions have been found to be significantly better in climbers when compared with sedentary individuals. However, during sustained contractions until exhaustion, climbers did not differ from the normal population, emphasising the importance of the ability to perform repeated isometric forearm contractions without fatigue becoming detrimental to performance.
A decrease in handgrip strength and endurance has been related to an increase in blood lactate, with lactate levels increasing with the angle of climbing. Active recovery has been shown to provide a better rate of recovery and allows the body to return to its pre-exercised state quicker. It could be suggested that an increased ability to tolerate and remove lactic acid during climbing may be beneficial.
Because of increased demand placed upon the upper body during climbing of increased difficulty, possessing greater strength and endurance in the arms and shoulders could be advantageous.
Flexibility has not been identified as a necessary determinant of climbing success, although climbing-specific flexibility could be valuable to climbing performance.
As the difficulty of climbing increases, so does oxygen uptake (V̇O2), energy expenditure and heart rate per metre of climb, with a disproportionate rise in heart rate compared with V̇O2. It was suggested that these may be due to a metaboreflex causing a sympathetically mediated pressor response. In addition, climbers had an attenuated blood pressure response to isometric handgrip exercises when compared with non-climbers, potentially because of reduced metabolite build-up causing less stimulation of the muscle metaboreflex.
Training has been emphasised as an important component in climbing success, although there is little literature reviewing the influence of specific training components upon climbing performance.
In summary, it appears that success in climbing is not related to individual physiological variables but is the result of a complex interaction of physiological and psychological factors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For grip 1, the subject was required to push the tips of all four fingers as far along the steel plate as possible. For grip 2, the subject stood in exactly the same position as for grip 1. In this test, however, the grip was used slightly differently. The bar was moved forward towards the horizontal plate, which left room for only the finger tips and the tip plate.
References
Grant S, Hasler T, Davies C, et al. A comparison of the anthropometric, strength, endurance and flexibility characteristics of female elite and recreational and non-climbers. J Sports Sci 2001; 19: 499–505
Watts PB, Martin DY, Durtschi S. Anthropometric profiles of elite male and female sport rock climbers. J Sports Sci 1993; 11: 113–117
Rockfax. Grade conversion table [online]. Available from URL: http://www.rockfax.com/publications/grades.html [Accessed 2006 Apr 12]
Watts PB. Physiology of difficult rock climbing. Eur J Appl Physiol 2004; 91: 361–372
Grant S, Hynes V, Whittaker A, et al. Anthropometric, strength, endurance and flexibility characteristics of elite and recreational climbers. J Sports Sci 1996; 14: 301–309
Booth J, Marino F, Hill C, et al. Energy cost of sport rock climbing in elite performers. Br J Sports Med 1999; 33: 14–18
Watts PB, Newbury V, Sulentic J. Acute changes in handgrip strength, endurance and blood lactate with sustained sport rock climbing. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1996; 36: 255–260
Mermier CM, Janot JM, Parker DL, et al. Physiological and anthropometric determinants of sport climbing performance. Br J Sports Med 2000; 34: 359–366
Sheel W, Sedden N, Knight A, et al. Physiological responses to indoor rock climbing and their relationship to maximal cycle ergometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35 (7): 1225–1123
Watts PB, Daggett M, Gallagher P, et al. Metabolic response during sport rock climbing and the effects of active vs passive recovery. Int J Sports Med 2000; 21: 185–190
Billat V, Palleja P, Charlaix T, et al. Energy specificity of rock climbing and aerobic capacity in competitive sport rock climbers. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1995; 35: 20–24
Quaine F, Viguoroux L, Martin L. Finger flexors fatigue in trained rock climbers and untrained sedentary subjects. Int J Sports Med 2003; 24: 424–427
Corbin C, Lindsey R, Welk G. Concepts of physical fitness: active lifestyle for wellness. Boston (MA): Mcgraw Hill, 2000
Ferguson RA, Brown MD. Arterial blood pressure and forearm vascular conductance response to sustained and rhythmic isometric exercise and arterial occlusion in trained rock climbers and untrained sedentary subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol 1997; 76: 174–180
Gresham N. Neil Gresham’s guide to campus boarding [online]. Available from URL: http://www.planetfear.com/ar-ticle_detail.asp?a_id=206 [Accessed 2006 May 10]
Sinoway LI, Musch TI, Minotti JR, et al. Enhanced maximal metabolic vasodilation in the dominant forearms of tennis players. J Appl Physiol 1986; 61: 108–115
McArdle W, Katch F, Kateh V. Exercise physiology: energy, nutrition and human performance. 5th ed. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001
Birkett B. Techniques in modern rock and ice climbing. London: ANC Black, 1988
Watts PB, Drobish KM. Physiological responses to simulated rock climbing at different angles. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30 (7): 1118–1122
Vokac Z, Bell H, Bautz-Holter E, et al. Oxygen uptake/heart rate relationship in leg and arm exercise, sitting and standing. J Appl Physiol 1975; 39: 54–59
Farrell PA, Wilmore JH, Coyle FF, et al. Plasma lactate accumulation and distance running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1979; 11: 338–344
O’Leary DS, Augustyniak RA, Ansorge EJ, et al. Muscle metaboreflex improves O2 delivery to ischemic active skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol 1999; 276: H1399–H1403
Watts PB, Daggett M, Gallagher P, et al. Metabolic response during sport rock climbing and the effects of active vs passive recovery. Int J Sports Med 2000; 21: 185–190
Janot JM, Steffen JP, Porcari JP, et al. Heart rate responses and perceived exertion for beginner and recreational sport climbers during indoor climbing. J Exerc Physiol 2000; 3 (1): 1–7
Hardy L, Martindale K. Some physiological parameters in rock climbing. Phys Educ Rev 1982; 5: 41–44
Wescott W. Fitness benefits of rock climbing. Am Fitness Q 1992; 10: 28–31
Koukoubis TD, Cooper LW, Glisson RR, et al. An electromyographic study of arm muscles during climbing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1995; 3 (2): 121–124
Acknowledgements
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giles, L.V., Rhodes, E.C. & Taunton, J.E. The Physiology of Rock Climbing. Sports Med 36, 529–545 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200636060-00006
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200636060-00006