Skip to main content
Log in

The Authors’ Reply

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Diamantopoulos A, Sawyer L, Ogale S, et al. Validity of cost and utility results? [letter]. Pharmacoeconomics 2012; 30 (10): 977.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen CM, Bounthavong M, Mendes MAS, et al. Cost utility of tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: an application of Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in a Markov model. Pharmacoeconomics 2012; 30 (7): 575–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rawles J. Castigating QALYs. J Med Ethics 1989; 15: 143–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lan JL, Chou SJ, Chen DY, et al. A comparative study of etanercept plus methotrexate and methotrexate alone in Taiwanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Formos Med Assoc 2004 Aug; 103 (8): 618–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Klareskog L, van der Heijde D, de Jager JP, et al. Therapeutic effect of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate compared with each treatment alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004 Feb 28; 363 (9410): 675–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weinblatt ME, Kremer JM, Bankhurst AD, et al. A trial of etanercept, a recombinant tumor necrosis factor receptor: Fc fusion protein, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate. N Engl J Med 1999 Jan; 340 (4): 253–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

MB has been awarded a grant from UCB Pharmaceuticals to evaluate certolizumab (CIMZIA®) at the Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System that was pending during the writing of the study manuscript.[2] All remaining authors declare that no conflicts of interest exist. In addition, the study was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bounthavong, M., Nguyen, C.M., Mendes, M.A.S. et al. The Authors’ Reply. PharmacoEconomics 30, 977–978 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2165/11633710-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11633710-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation