Skip to main content
Log in

Enteric Coating Reduces Upper Gastrointestinal Adverse Reactions to Doxycycline

  • Clinical Use
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 July 1995

Summary

A new doxycycline formulation consisting of enteric-coated doxycycline hyclate pellets in capsules is aimed at reducing gastrointestinal adverse reactions related to doxycycline therapy. In this randomised, double-blind, 3-way crossover study, adverse reactions caused by short term treatment with enteric-coated doxycycline hyclate pellets in capsules were compared with placebo and doxycycline monohydrate tablets. The latter are generally considered to be better tolerated than older formulations of doxycycline hyclate. 111 healthy volunteers completed the study. They were given 150mg of doxycycline once daily over 3 consecutive days with a washout of 4 to 10 days between the study periods. The medication was administered after an overnight fast (10 hours) with 200ml of tap water. An upright position was maintained for 1 hour and no food was allowed for 2 hours after drug administration. Participants recorded adverse reactions daily. Adverse reactions were reported by 66% of the subjects during treatment with doxycycline monohydrate, while 43% reported adverse reactions during treatment with enteric-coated doxycycline hyclate and 30% during placebo. Compared with the 2 other groups, doxycycline monohydrate caused significantly more adverse reactions in general, and abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting in particular. It is concluded that enteric-coated doxycycline hyclate pellets in capsules have significantly better gastrointestinal tolerability compared with doxycycline monohydrate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cunha BA, Sibley CM, Ristucca AM. Doxycycline. Ther Drug Monit 1982; 4: 115–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Doxycycline (hydrochloride). In: Dollery Colin Sir, editor. Therapeutic Drugs. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1991: D225–D228

  3. Bryant SG, Fisher S, Kluge RM. Increased frequency of doxycycline side-effects, Pharmacother 1987; 7: 125–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beltran RR, Herrero JIH. Evaluation of ciprofloxacin and doxycycline in the treatment of mediterranean spotted fever. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1992; 11: 427–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. De Vlieger A, Druart M, Puttemans M. Roxithromycin versus doxycycline in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1992; 15: 123S–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schouwenburg van J, Bruyn de O, Fourie E, et al. A randomized, comparative study of the efficacy and tolerance of roxithromycin and doxycycline in the treatment of women with positive endocervical cultures for chlamydia trachomatis and mycoplasma spp. in an in vitro fertilization program. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1992; 15: 129S–131S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams DB, O’Reilly WJ, Boehm G, et al. Absorption of doxycycline from a controlled release pellet formulation: The influence of food on bioavailability. Biopharm Drug Disp 1990; 11: 93–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Berger RS. A double-blind, multiple dose, placebo-controlled, cross-over study to compare the incidence of gastrointestinal complaints in healthy subjects given Doryx® and Vibramycin®. J Clin Pharmacol 1988; 28: 367–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Story JM, McCloud PI, Boehm G. Doxycycline tolerance study. Incidence of nausea after doxycycline administration to healthy volunteers: a comparison of 2 formulations (Doryx® vs Vibramycin®). Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1991; 40: 419–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carlborg B, Farmer JC. Esophageal corrosion tests with doxycycline monohydrate tablets. Curr Ther Res 1983; 34: 110–6

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lanza FL. Esophageal ulceration produced by doxycycline. Curr Ther Res 1988; 44: 475–84

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Machin D, Campbell MJ. Statistical tables for the design of clinical trials. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1987, 10–3

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03257462.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Järvinen, A., Nykänen, S., Paasiniemi, L. et al. Enteric Coating Reduces Upper Gastrointestinal Adverse Reactions to Doxycycline. Clin. Drug Invest. 10, 323–327 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-199510060-00002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-199510060-00002

Keywords

Navigation