Skip to main content
Log in

Bond of tension bars in underwater concrete: effect of bar diameter and cover

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research project is undertaken to assess the effect of washout loss on the drop in bond properties of reinforcing steel bars embedded in underwater concrete (UWC). Special emphasis was placed to evaluate bond using the same concrete mixtures that were subjected to washout. Testing was realized using the beam-end specimen method, and parameters evaluated included level of washout loss, bar diameter, and concrete cover. Test results showed that bond between steel and UWC is affected by the level of washout loss, which in turn is directly influenced by the mixture composition. Similarly to bond in concrete cast and consolidated above water, the ultimate UWC bond strength increases for smaller bar diameters and higher confinement reflected by increased concrete covers. UWC mixtures with increased washout losses exhibited higher drops in compressive, tensile, and bond strengths, as compared to concrete cast above water. Two boxes depending on the level of washout loss, i.e. from 4.2 to 6.9 % and from 8.8 to 10.8 %, have been proposed to predict the extent of bond decrease in UWC mixtures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ACI Committee 408R (2003) Bond and Development of Straight Reinforcing Bars in Tension. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, p 42

    Google Scholar 

  2. Federation internationale du beton, The Int. Federation for Structural Concrete, Bond of reinforcement in concrete, fib Bulletin No. 10, 2000, 434 p., ISBN: 978-2-88394-050-5

  3. Tepfers RA (1973) Theory of Bond Applied to Overlapped Tensile Reinforcement Splices for Deformed Bars. Doctor thesis. Work No. 723, Publ. 73:2. Division of Concrete Structures, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, p. 328

  4. ACI Committee 318 (2011) Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, p 369

    Google Scholar 

  5. AASHTO (1989) Standard Specification for Highway Bridges, 14th edn. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  6. Federation Internationale du beton (2002) The Int. Federation for Structural Concrete, Model Code 2010—Final draft, Volume 1, fib Bulletin No. 65, p. 350, ISBN: 978-2-88394-105-2

  7. Hughes BP (1961) Development of an apparatus to determine the resistance to separation of fresh concrete. Civil Eng. Public Rev. 56(658):633–634

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sonebi M, Khayat KH (1999) Effect of water velocity on the performance of underwater self-consolidating concrete. ACI Mat. J. 96(5):519–528

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khayat KH (1998) Viscosity-enhancing admixtures for cement-based materials: An overview. Cem. Con. Comp. 20:171–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sakata M (1983) Use of acryl-type polymer as admixture for underwater concrete, polymer concrete.In: Dikeou, Fowler (eds), p 55

  11. CRD C61-89A Test Method for Determining the Resistance of Freshly-mixed Concrete to Washing out in Water. US Army Waterways Experiment Station, Handbook for Cement and Concrete, Vicksburg, 1989, p. 3

  12. Staynes BW, Corbett BO (1987) The role of polymers in underwater and slurry trench construction. The production, performance and potential of polymers in concrete. In: Staynes BW (ed) Int. Congress Polymers in Concrete. Brighton University, p 12

  13. Perry SH, Holmyard JM (1992) Scaling of Underwater Concrete Repair Materials. Technical Report, OTH 89-298, p. 62

  14. Moon HY, Shin KJ (2006) Evaluation on steel bar corrosion embedded in antiwashout underwater concrete containing mineral admixtures. Cem. Con. Res. 36:521–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A McLeish, Underwater Concreting and Repairing, ed. by McLeish A., ISBN 470234032 (1994), p. 155

  16. Assaad JJ, Issa C (2013) Effect of washout loss on bond behavior of steel embedded in underwater concrete. ACI Str. J. 110(3):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  17. Assaad JJ, Daou Y, Khayat KH (2009) Simulation of water pressure on washout of underwater concrete repair. ACI Mat. J. 106(6):529–536

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cairns J, Plizzari G (2003) Towards a harmonized European bond test. Mater Struct. 36(262):498–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. ASTM A944 (2010) Standard Test Method for Comparing Bond Strength of Steel Reinforcing Bars to Concrete Using Beam-End Specimens. ASTM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  20. ASTM C33 (2003) Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates. ASTM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  21. ASTM A615/A615 M (2012) Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement. ASTM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  22. Metelli G, Plizzari G (2003) Influence of the relative rib area on bond behavior. Mag. Concrete Res. 66(6):277–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. ASTM E8/E8 M (2011) Standard test methods for tension of metallic Materials. ASTM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  24. Assaad JJ, Daou Y, Harb J (2011) Use of CEM approach to develop and optimize high-performance underwater concrete. J. Mat. Civil Eng. 23(7):1094–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ASTM C 143/C 143 M-05a (2005) Standard test method for slump of hydraulic-cement concrete. ASTM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  26. ASTM C1611/C1611 M-09be1 (2009) Standard Test Method for Slump Flow of Self-Consolidating Concrete. ASTM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  27. ASTM C 231-04 (2004) Standard test method for air content of freshly mixed concrete by the pressure method. ASTM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  28. ASTM C31/C31 M (2012) Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Field. ASTM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  29. ASTM C39/C39 M (2012) Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. ASTM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  30. ASTM C496/C496 M (2011) Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. ASTM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  31. Abrams DA (1913) Tests of bond between concrete and steel. University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station Bullletin No. 71, University of Illinois, Urbana, p. 238

  32. Basant ZP, Sener S (1988) Size effect in pullout tests. ACI Mat. J. 85(M35):347–351

    Google Scholar 

  33. Haskett M, Oehlers DJ, Ali M (2008) Local and global bond characteristics of steel reinforcing bars. Eng. Struct. 30:376–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Watson AK, LaFave JM (1994) Effect of increased tensile strength and toughness on reinforcing-bar bond behavior. Cem. Con. Comp. 16:129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by CNRS-Lebanon and University Research Council of the Lebanese American University (LAU), Byblos, Lebanon. The authors also wish to thank the experimental support provided by the Laboratory of the Civil Engineering Department in LAU.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph J. Assaad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Issa, C.A., Assaad, J.J. Bond of tension bars in underwater concrete: effect of bar diameter and cover. Mater Struct 48, 3457–3471 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0414-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0414-4

Keywords

Navigation