Skip to main content
Log in

Hoop strains in FRP-confined concrete columns: experimental observations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is now well understood that the hoop rupture strain of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) jackets confining concrete is often lower than the ultimate tensile strain of the component fibers. This paper presents the results of an experimental study designed specifically to investigate the two newly identified material dependent factors influencing the hoop strain efficiency of FRP jackets. 36 circular FRP-confined normal and high-strength concrete (normal-strength concrete and High-strength concrete) specimens were tested under axial compression. The results indicate that the hoop rupture strains of FRP jackets decrease with either an increase in the strength of the unconfined concrete or the elastic modulus of the fiber material. These observations were verified by additional results from a large FRP-confined concrete test database assembled from the published literature. In addition, the hoop strain-axial strain relationship of FRP-confined concrete was studied and the influence of the test parameters on the behavior was established. The findings from these investigations are presented together with an expression for the prediction of the strain reduction factor and a model to describe the hoop strain-axial strain relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ozbakkaloglu T, Lim JC, Vincent T (2013) FRP-confined concrete in circular sections: review and assessment of stress–strain models. Eng Struct 49:1068–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ilki A, Kumbasar N (2003) Compressive behaviour of carbon fibre composite jacketed concrete with circular and non-circular cross-sections. J Earthquake Eng 7(3):381–406

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lam L, Teng JG (2003) Design-oriented stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete. Constr Build Mater 17(6–7):471–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rousakis TC, Karabinis AI (2008) Substandard reinforced concrete members subjected to compression: fRP confining effects. Mater Struct 41(9):1595–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu Y-F, Jiang J-F (2013) Effective strain of FRP for confined circular concrete columns. Compos Struct 95:479–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pessiki S, Harries KA, Kestner JT, Sause R, Ricles JM (2001) Axial behavior of reinforced concrete columns confined with FRP jackets. J Comps Constr 5(4):237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harries KA, Kharel G (2002) Behavior and modeling of concrete subject to variable confining pressure. ACI Mater J 99(2):180–189

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lam L, Teng JG (2004) Ultimate condition of fiber reinforced polymer-confined concrete. J Compo Constr ASCE 8(6):539–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lim JC, Ozbakkaloglu T (2014) Confinement model for FRP-confined high-strength concrete. J Compo Constr 17(5):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  10. Matthys S, Taerwe L, Audenaert K (1999) Tests on axially loaded concrete columns confined by fiber reinforced polymer sheet wrapping. ACI Spec Publ 188:217–228

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shahawy M, Mirmiran A, Beitelman T (2000) Tests and modeling of carbon-wrapped concrete columns. Compo Part B-Eng 31(6–7):471–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiao Y, Wu H (2000) Compressive behavior of concrete confined by carbon fiber composite jackets. J Mater Civ Eng 12(2):139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. De Lorenzis L, Tepfers R (2003) Comparative study of models on confinement of concrete cylinders with fiber-reinforced polymer composites. J Compo Constr 7(3):219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harries KA, Carey SA (2003) Shape and “gap” effects on the behavior of variably confined concrete. Cem Concr Res 33(6):881–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carey SA, Harries KA (2005) Axial behavior and modeling of confined small-, medium-, and large-scale circular sections with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer jackets. ACI Struct J 102(4):596–604

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lignola, G.P., Prota, A., Manfredi, G., and Cosenza, E., (2008). “Effective strain in FRP jackets on circular RC columns.” Proceedings of the 4th international conference on FRP composites in civil engineering, Zurich, p 6

  17. Ozbakkaloglu T, Oehlers DJ (2008) Concrete-filled square and rectangular FRP tubes under axial compression. J Compo Constr 12(4):469–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ozbakkaloglu T, Oehlers DJ (2008) Manufacture and testing of a novel FRP tube confinement system. Eng Struct 30:2448–2459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen JF, Ai J, Stratford TJ (2010) Effect of Geometric Discontinuities on Strains in FRP-Wrapped Columns. J Compo Constr 14(2):136–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith ST, Kim SJ, Zhang H (2010) Behavior and Effectiveness of FRP Wrap in the Confinement of Large Concrete Cylinders. J Compo Constr 14(5):573–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ozbakkaloglu T, Akin E (2012) Behavior of FRP-confined normal- and high-strength concrete under cyclic axial compression. J Compo Constr ASCE 16(4):451–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rousakis TC, Rakitzis TD, Karabinis AI (2012) Design-Oriented Strength Model for FRP-Confined Concrete Members. J Compo Constr 16(6):615–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ozbakkaloglu T (2013) Compressive behavior of concrete-filled FRP tube columns: assessment of critical column parameters. Eng Struct 51:188–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ozbakkaloglu T, Vincent T (2013) Axial compressive behavior of circular high-strength concrete-filled FRP tubes. J Compo Constr ASCE 18(2):04013037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vincent T, Ozbakkaloglu T (2013) Influence of concrete strength and confinement method on axial compressive behavior of FRP-confined high- and ultra high-strength concrete. Compos B 50:413–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vincent T, Ozbakkaloglu T (2013) Influence of fiber orientation and specimen end condition on axial compressive behavior of FRP-confined concrete. Constr Build Mater 47:814–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ozbakkaloglu T, Lim JC (2013) Axial compressive behavior of FRP-confined concrete: experimental test database and a new design-oriented model. Compos B Eng 55:607–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Watanabe K, Nakamura R, Honda Y, Toyoshima M, Iso M, Fujimaki T, Kaneto M, Shirai N (1997) Confinement effect of FRP sheet on strength and ductility of concrete cylinders under uniaxial compression. In: Proceedings of the non-metallic reinforcement for concrete structures, Japan Concrete Institute

  29. De Lorenzis L, Micelli F, La Tegola A (2002) Influence of specimen size and resin type on the behavior of FRP-confined concrete cylinders. Advanced polymer composites for structural applications in construction. In: Proceedings of the first international conference, Southampton

  30. Bullo S (2003) Experimental study of the effects of the ultimate strain of fiber reinforced plastic jackets on the behavior of confined concrete. In: Proceedings of the international conference of composites in construction, Cosenza, Italy

  31. Tepfers R, Rousakis T, You CS (2003) Concrete cylinders confined by carbon FRP sheets, subjected to monotonic and cyclic axial compressive load. In: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcement for concrete structures, Singapore, p 571–580

  32. Berthet JF, Ferrier E, Hamelin P (2005) Compressive behavior of concrete externally confined by composite jackets. Part A: experimental study. Constr Build Mater 19(3):223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lam L, Teng JG, Cheung CH, Xiao Y (2006) FRP-confined concrete under axial cyclic compression. Cement Concr Compos 28(10):949–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ciupala MA, Pilakoutas K, Mortazavi AA (2007) Effectiveness of FRP composites in confined concrete. In: Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on fiber reinforced polymer reinforcement for concrete structures, University of Patras, Patras, Greece

  35. Jiang T, Teng JG (2007) Analysis-oriented stress-strain models for FRP-confined concrete. Eng Struct 29(11):2968–2986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Valdmanis V, De Lorenzis L, Rousakis T, Tepfers R (2007) Behaviour and capacity of CFRP-confined concrete cylinders subjected to monotonic and cyclic axial compressive load. Struct Concr 8(4):187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang LM, Wu YF (2008) Effect of corner radius on the performance of CFRP-confined square concrete columns: test. Eng Struct 30(2):493–505

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Bisby LA, Take WA (2009) Strain localisations in FRP-confined concrete: new insights. Proc Inst Civil Eng–Struct Build 162(5):301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cui C, Sheikh A (2009) Behaviour of normal- and high strength-concrete confined with fibre reinforced polymers (FRP). Research Report No. CS-01-09, department of civil engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto

  40. Benzaid R, Mesbah H, Chikh NE (2010) FRP-confined Concrete Cylinders: axial Compression Experiments and Strength Model. J Reinf Plast Compos 29(16):2469–2488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rousakis TC, Karabinis AI (2012) Adequately FRP confined reinforced concrete columns under axial compressive monotonic or cyclic loading. Mater Struct 45(7):957–975

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. ASTM-D3039 (2008) Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. D3039/D3039 M-08, West Conshohocken, PA

  43. Ilki A, Kumbasar N, Koc V (2004) Low strength concrete members externally confined with FRP sheets. Struct Eng Mech 18(2):167–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Matthys S, Toutanji H, Taerwe L (2006) Stress-strain behavior of large-scale circular columns confined with FRP composites. J Struct Eng 132(1):123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rousakis TC, Karabinis AI, Kiousis PD (2007) FRP-confined concrete members: axial compression experiments and plasticity modelling. Eng Struct 29(7):1343–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ozbakkaloglu T (2013) Axial compressive behavior of square and rectangular high-strength concrete-filled FRP tubes. J Compo Constr 17(1):151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ozbakkaloglu T (2013) Behavior of square and rectangular ultra high-strength concrete-filled FRP tubes under axial compression. Compos B Eng 54:97–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Dai JG, Bai YL, Teng JG (2011) Behavior and modeling of concrete confined with FRP composites of large deformability. ASCE J Compos Constr 15(6):963–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Lim JC, Ozbakkaloglu T (2014) Lateral strain-to-axial strain relationship of confined concrete. J Struct Eng ASCE. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001094

    Google Scholar 

  50. Candappa DC, Sanjayan JG, Setunge S (2001) Complete triaxial stress-strain curves of high-strength concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 13(3):209–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Tasdemir MA, Tasdemir C, Jefferson AD, Lydon FD, Barr BIG (1998) Evaluation of strains at peak stresses in concrete: a three-phase composite model approach. Cem Concr Res 20(4):301–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Togay Ozbakkaloglu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lim, J.C., Ozbakkaloglu, T. Hoop strains in FRP-confined concrete columns: experimental observations. Mater Struct 48, 2839–2854 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0358-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0358-8

Keywords

Navigation