Skip to main content
Log in

Parameters influencing pressure during pumping of self-compacting concrete

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main difference between conventional vibrated concrete (CVC) and self-compacting concrete (SCC) is observed in the fresh state, as SCC has a significantly lower yield stress. On the other hand, the placement of SCC by means of pumping is done with the same equipment and following the same practical guidelines developed for CVC. It can be questioned whether the flow behaviour in pipes of SCC is different and whether the developed practical guidelines can still be applied. This paper describes the results of full-scale pumping tests carried out on several SCC mixtures. It shows primarily that the slump or yield stress of the concrete is no longer a dominating factor for SCC, as it is for CVC. Instead, the pressure losses are well related to the viscosity and the V-funnel flow time of SCC. Secondly, bends cause an additional pressure loss for SCC, which is in contrast to the observations of Kaplan and Chapdelaine and the estimation of the practical guidelines is not always on the safe side. Finally, due to the specific mix design of SCC, blocking is less likely to occur during pumping operations, but the same rules as for CVC must be applied during start-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ozawa K, Maekawa K, Kunishima M, Okamura H (1989) High-performance concrete based on the durability design of concrete structures. Proc 2nd East Asia: Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction, Chiang Mae, Vol. 1, pp 445–456

  2. Wallevik JE (2003) Rheology of particle suspensions,.Ph-D dissertation, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim

  3. Crepas RA (1997) Pumping concrete, techniques and applications, 3rd edn. Crepas and Associates, Inc., Elmhurst

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guptill NR et al (1998) (ACI-Comm 304), Placing concrete by pumping methods. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills

  5. Spiratos N, Pagé M, Mailvaganam N, Malhotra VM, Jolicoeur C (2003) Superplasticizers for Concrete: fundamentals, technology, and practice, Ottawa

  6. Kaplan D (2001) Pumping of concretes. PhD dissertation, Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées, Paris

  7. Chapdelaine F (2007) Fundamental and practical study on the pumping of concrete. PhD dissertation , Université Laval, Québec

  8. Tattersall GH, Banfill PFG (1983) The rheology of fresh concrete. Pitman, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wallevik OH (2003) Rheology: a scientific approach to develop self-compacting concrete. Proc 3rd Int Symp on Self-Compacting Concrete, Reykjavik, pp 23–31

  10. Roussel N (2006) A thixotropy model for fresh fluid concretes: theory, validation and applications. Cem. Conc. Res. 36:1797–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wallevik JE (2009) Rheological properties of cement paste: thixotropic behavior and structural breakdown. Cem Concr Res 39:14–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cyr M, Legrand C, Mouret M (2000) Study of the shear thickening effect of superplasticizers on the rheological behaviour of cement pastes containing or not mineral additives. Cem. Conc. Res. 30:1477–1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. De Larrard F, Ferraris CF, Sedran T (1998) Fresh concrete: a Herschel-Bulkley material. Mat Struct 31:494–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feys D, Verhoeven R, De Schutter G (2008) Fresh self compacting concrete: a shear thickening material. Cem Concr Res 38:920–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heirman G, Vandewalle L, Van Gemert D, Wallevik OH (2008) Integration approach of the Couette inverse problem of powder type self-compacting concrete in a wide-gap concentric cylinder rheometer. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 150:93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yahia A, Khayat KH (2001) Analytical models for estimating yield stress of high-performance pseudoplastic grout. Cem Concr Res 31:731–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Feys D, Verhoeven R, De Schutter G (2009) Why is fresh self-compacting concrete shear thickening? Cem Concr Res 39:510–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Browne RD, Bamforth PB (1977) Tests to establish concrete pumpability. ACI-J 74:193–203

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ede AN (1957) The resistance of concrete pumped through pipelines. Mag Concr Res 9:129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yammine J, Chaouche M, Guerinet M, Moranville M, Roussel N (2008) From ordinary rheology concrete to self compacting concrete: a transition between frictional and hydrodynamic interactions. Cem Concr Res 38:890–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. ASTM C 33 (2003) Standard specification for concrete aggregates. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia

  22. Jolin M, Burns D, Bissonnette B, Gagnon F, Bolduc L-S (2009) Understanding the pumpability of concrete. Proc 11th Conf Shotcrete Underground Support, Davos

  23. Kasami H, Ikeda T, Yamane S (1979) On workability and pumpability of superplasticized concrete. Proc 1st CANMET/ACI Conf Superplasticizers in Concrete, Ottawa, pp 67–86

  24. Sakuta M, Kasanu I, Yamane S, Sakamoto A (1989) Pumpability of fresh concrete. Takenaka Technical Research Laboratory, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schwing (1983) In: Eckardstein KEV (ed) Pumping, concrete and concrete pumps: a concrete placing manual, p 133

  26. De Schutter G, Bartos P, Domone P, Gibbs J (2008) Self-compacting concrete. Whittles Publishing, Caithness

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kaplan D, de Larrard F, Sedran T (2005) Avoidance of blockages in concrete pumping process. ACI Mat J 102–3:183–191

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jacobsen S, Haugan L, Hammer TA, Kalogiannidis E (2009) Flow conditions of fresh mortar and concrete in different pipes. Cem Concr Res 39:997–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rössig M (1974) Pumping of fresh concrete, in particular lightweight concrete, through pipes. PhD dissertation, RWTH Aachen, Westdeutscher, Opladen, p 224

  30. Chalimo T, Touloupov N, Markovskiy M (1989), Pecularities of concrete pumping (in Russian). Minsk

  31. Morinaga M (1973) Pumpability of concrete and pumping pressure in pipeline. Proc RILEM Seminar on Fresh Concrete: Important Properties and their Measurement, Vol 7, Leeds, pp 1–39

  32. Thrane LN (2007) Form filling with SCC. PhD dissertation, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark

  33. Ngo TT (2009) Influence of concrete composition on pumping parameters and validation of a prediction model for the viscous constant. Ph-D dissertation, University Cergy-Pontoise

  34. Feys D (2009) Interactions between rheological properties and pumping of self-compacting concrete. PhD dissertation, Ghent University, Ghent

  35. Feys D, Heirman G, De Schutter G, Verhoeven R, Vandewalle L, Van Gemert D (2007) Comparison of two concrete rheometers for shear thickening behaviour of SCC. Proc. 5th Int RILEM Symp on SCC, Ghent, p 365–370

  36. Macosko CW (1994) Rheology principle, measurements and applications. Wiley-VCH, New-York

    Google Scholar 

  37. Poiseuille JLM (1840) Recherches expérimentales sur le mouvement des liquides dans les tubes de très-petits diamètres. CR Acad Sci Paris 11:961–967, 1041–1049

    Google Scholar 

  38. Poiseuille JLM (1841) Recherches expérimentales sur le mouvement des liquides dans les tubes de très-petits diamèters. CR Acad Sci Paris 12:112–115

    Google Scholar 

  39. Buckingham E (1921) On plastic flow through capillary tubes. Proc. Am. Soc. Testing Mat. 21:1154–1161

    Google Scholar 

  40. Feys D, Verhoeven R, De Schutter G (2008) Extension of the Poiseuille formula for shear thickening materials and application to self compacting concrete. Appl Rheol 18(6):62705

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jacobsen S, Vikan H, Haugan L (2010) Flow of SCC along surfaces. Proc 6th Int RILEM Symp Design, Prod Placement SCC, Montréal, Vol I, pp 63–174

  42. Jodeh SA, Nassar GE (2009) Pumpability assessment of C90 SCC. Proc 2nd Int Conf Adv Concr Technol Middle-East: Self-Consolid Concr, Abu Dhabi, pp 155–176

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Research Foundation in Flanders, Belgium (FWO) for the financial support of the project and the technical staff of both the Magnel and Hydraulics laboratory for the preparation and execution of the full-scale pumping tests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitri Feys.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feys, D., De Schutter, G. & Verhoeven, R. Parameters influencing pressure during pumping of self-compacting concrete. Mater Struct 46, 533–555 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9912-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9912-4

Keywords

Navigation