Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of shear bond strength on compressive strength and stress–strain characteristics of masonry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper is focused on shear bond strength–masonry compressive strength relationships and the influence of bond strength on stress–strain characteristics of masonry using soil–cement blocks and cement–lime mortar. Methods of enhancing shear bond strength of masonry couplets without altering the strength and modulus of masonry unit and the mortar are discussed in detail. Application of surface coatings and manipulation of surface texture of the masonry unit resulted in 3–4 times increase in shear bond strength. After adopting various bond enhancing techniques masonry prism strength and stress–strain relations were obtained for the three cases of masonry unit modulus to mortar modulus ratio of one, less than one and greater than one. Major conclusions of this extensive experimental study are: (1) when the masonry unit modulus is less than that of the mortar, masonry compressive strength increases as the bond strength increases and the relationship between masonry compressive strength and the bond strength is linear and (2) shear bond strength influences modulus of masonry depending upon relative stiffness of the masonry unit and mortar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Francis AJ, Horman CB, Jerrems LE (1971) The effect of joint thickness and other factors on compressive strength of brickwork. In: Proceedings of 2nd international brick masonry conference, stoke-on-trent, pp 31–37

  2. Hilsdorf HK (1969) An investigation into the failure mechanism of brick masonry loaded in axial compression. In: Johnson FB (ed) Designing, engineering and constructing with masonry products. Gulf, Houston, pp 34–41

  3. Khoo CL, Hendry AW (1975) A failure criterion for brickwork in axial compression. In: Foertig L, Gobel K (eds) Proceedings of 3rd international brick masonry conference, pp 39–145

  4. Atkinson RH, Noland JL, Abrams DP (1982) A deformation theory for stack bonded masonry prisms in compression. In: Proceedings 7th international brick masonry conference, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Australia, pp 565–576

  5. McNary WS, Abrams DP (1985) Mechanics of masonry in compression. J Struct Eng 111(4):857–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sarangapani G, Venkatarama Reddy BV, Jagadish KS (2005) Brick–mortar bond and masonry compressive strength. J Mater Civil Eng (ASCE) 17(2):229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Matthana MHS (1996) Strength of brick masonry and masonry with openings. PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

  8. Grandet J, Javelas R, Perrin B, Thenoz B (1972) Rôle de l’ettringite dans la liaison de type mécanique entra la terre cuite et la pâte de ciment-portland. Revue Terre Cuite 48:21–28

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lawrence SJ, Cao HT (1987) An experimental study of the interface between brick and mortar. In: Proceedings 4th N Am masonry conference, Dublin, pp 194–204

  10. Lawrence SJ, Cao HT (1988) Microstructure of the interface between brick and mortar. In: Proceedings 8th international brick/block masonry conference, Dublin, pp 194–204

  11. Groot Caspar JWS (1993) Effects of water on mortar brick bond. PhD thesis, University of Delft, Delft, The Netherlands

  12. Sinha BP (1967) Model studies related to load bearing brickwork. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK

  13. Thornton JC (1953) Relation between bond and surface physics of masonry units. J Am Ceram Soc 36(4):105–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kampf L (1963) Factors affecting bond of mortar to brick. In: Proceedings of symposium on masonry testing, vol 320. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM STP, pp 127–141

  15. Brick Institute of America (BIA) (1989) Portland cement–lime mortars for brick masonry. Technical Notes 8 Revised, February 1989

  16. Venkatarama Reddy BV, Richardson L, Nanjunda Rao KS (2007) Enhancing bond strength and characteristics of soil cement block masonry. J Mater Civil Eng (ASCE) 19(2):164–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Venumadhava Rao K, Venkatarama Reddy BV, Jagadish KS (1996) Flexural bond strength of masonry using various blocks and mortars. Mater Struct (RILEM) 29(186):119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Walker PJ (1999) Bond characteristics of earth block masonry. J Mater Civil Eng (ASCE) 11(3):249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Venkatarama Reddy BV, Gupta A (2006) Tensile bond strength of soil–cement block masonry couplets using cement–soil mortars. J Mater Civil Eng (ASCE) 18(1):36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Venumadhava Rao K, Venkatarama Reddy BV, Jagadish KS (1995) Influence of flexural bond strength on compressive strength of masonry. In: Proceedings of national conference on civil engineering materials and structures, Osmania University, Hyderabad, India, pp 103–108

  21. Sarangapani G, Venkatarama Reddy BV, Jagadish KS (2002) Structural characteristics of bricks, mortars and masonry. J Struct Eng (India) 29(2):101–107

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gumaste KS, Venkatarama Reddy BV, Nanjunda Rao KS, Jagadish KS (2004) Properties of burnt bricks and mortars in India. Masonry Int 17(2):45–52

    Google Scholar 

  23. UN Report (1964) Soil–cement—its use in building. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York, USA

  24. Lunt MG (1980) Stabilized soil blocks for buildings. Overseas Building Notes, No. 184, February

  25. Heathcote K (1991) Compressive strength of cement stabilized pressed earth blocks. Build Res Inf 19(2):101–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Walker PJ, Stace T (1997) Properties of some cement stabilised compressed earth blocks and mortars. Mater Struct (RILEM) 30:545–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Walker PJ (2004) Strength and erosion characteristics of earth blocks and earth block masonry. J Mater Civil Eng (ASCE) 16(5):497–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Venkatarama Reddy BV (2002) The progress of stabilised mud block construction in India. In: Proceedings of national workshop on alternative building methods, Indian Institute Science, Bangalore, India, 16–18 January, pp 84–94

  29. Houben H, Guillaud H (1994) Earth construction—a comprehensive guide. Intermediate Technology Publication, London

    Google Scholar 

  30. Walker P, Venkatarama Reddy BV, Mesbah A, Morel J-C (2000) The case for compressed earth block construction. In: Venkatarama Reddy BV, Sinha BP (eds) Proceedings of 6th international seminar on structural masonry for developing countries. Allied Publishers India, pp 27–35

  31. Venkatarama Reddy BV, Jagadish KS (1995) Influence of soil composition on the strength and durability of soil–cement blocks. Indian Concr J 69(9):517–524

    Google Scholar 

  32. Olivier M, Mesbah A (1987) Influence of different parameters on the resistance of earth, used as a building material. In: Proceedings of international conference on mud architecture, Trivandrum, India, 25–27 November

  33. Venkatarama Reddy BV, Walker P (2005) Stabilised mud blocks: problems prospects. In: Proceedings of international earth building conference-earthbuild2005, Sydney, Australia, 19–21 January, pp 63–75

  34. Venkatarama Reddy BV, Richardson L, Nanjunda Rao KS (2007) Optimum soil grading for the soil–cement blocks. J Mater Civil Eng (ASCE) 19(2):139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. IS: 3495 (1992) Methods of tests of burnt building bricks–part 2: determination of water absorption. Bureau of Indian Standards, India

  36. IS: 8112 (1989) Specification for 43 grade ordinary Portland cement. Bureau of Indian Standards, India

  37. IS: 2250 (1981) Indian standard code of practice for preparation and use of masonry mortars. Bureau of Indian Standards, India

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India

    B. V. Venkatarama Reddy & Ch. V. Uday Vyas

Authors
  1. B. V. Venkatarama Reddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ch. V. Uday Vyas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. V. Venkatarama Reddy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Venkatarama Reddy, B.V., Uday Vyas, C.V. Influence of shear bond strength on compressive strength and stress–strain characteristics of masonry. Mater Struct 41, 1697–1712 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9358-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9358-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation