Skip to main content
Log in

Vrancea rapid early warning system (REWS) for Bucharest and industrial objectives — New technology for earthquakes monitoring

  • Published:
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays natural disasters phenomena as hurricanes, volcanic eruptions, tsunamis or earthquakes, are still difficult to prevent. Based on signaling of the phenomenon imminent appearance in the destructive area, important limitations in human losses and material damages will be carried out. For that reason, WARNING turned into a key objective, both in theoretical and practical research.

For the earthquakes, warning intervals are nevertheless very short — seconds to maximum one minute (Mexico City case). Even if the time window is reduced, automated decision measures are possible to establish in case of an well organized system, mainly for: protection of dangerous chemical units and oil installations; shutdown valves of the natural gas pipelines to prevent fire hazard; protection of nuclear power plants and other high-risk nuclear objectives; electrical insulating of the power distribution network systems; alerting of emergency services, alerting of civil protection, and particularly of civil population; protection of railway transportation systems etc.

In Romania, the major seismic risk zone is located in Vrancea region. The earthquakes occurring in this area are the main sources of the seismic hazard on the Romania territory.

Seismotectonic characteristics of the Vrancea region offered the opportunity to create and develop a rapid seismic warning system. This system is simple, reasonably low-priced and robust and allows warning in an approximately 25 seconds time window for Bucharest. Warning signal obtained will be issued at the responsible factors and specific users in order to control automated blocking of the installations and to carry out the required protection actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Espinosa Aranda J M, Jimenez A, Ibarrola G, Alcantar F, Aguilar A, Inostroza M, Maldonado S 1995: Seismological Research Letters, 66, 42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee W H K, Shin T C, Teng T L 1996: In: Proc. 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico

  • Nakamura Y 1989: Japanese Railway Engineering, 28, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y 1996: In: Proc. 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico

  • Oncescu M C, Marza V I, Rizescu M, Popa M 1999: In: Vrancea Earthquakes: Tectonics, Hazard and Risk Mitigation. F Wenzel, D Lungu eds. and O Novak co-ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherland, 43–47.

  • Wenzel F, Oncescu M C, Baur M, Fiedrich F, Ionescu C 1999: Seismological Research Letters, 70, 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel F, Oncescu M C, Baur M, Fiedrich F, Ionescu C 2001: Natural Hazards, 23, 407–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Ionescu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ionescu, C., Marmureanu, A. Vrancea rapid early warning system (REWS) for Bucharest and industrial objectives — New technology for earthquakes monitoring. Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung 41, 349–359 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1556/AGeod.41.2006.3-4.7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/AGeod.41.2006.3-4.7

Keywords

Navigation