Skip to main content
Log in

Is Cooperation Stimulated in a Prisoner’s Dilemma by Establishing an Efficient Outcome in a Simultaneously Played Coordination Game?: An Experimental Analysis

  • Article
  • Published:
Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The bargaining process in economic and political issues such as the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) can present players with a situation wherein they engage in multiple games with their counterpart. Such a situation can be modeled as playing a Prisoner’s Dilemma (PD) game and a Coordination Game (CG) simultaneously and repeatedly with the counterpart. Referring to the equilibrium prediction and prior experimental results, we experimentally compared the individual and mutual cooperation rates in the PD when the subjects repeatedly played only the PD game with the identical counterpart (treatment G D) and when they repeatedly and simultaneously played the PD and the CG with the identical counterpart in each round (treatment G DC). First, we found that the individual cooperation rate was higher in the G D treatment than in the G DC treatment. Second, the mutual cooperation rate was higher in the G DC treatment than in the G D treatment in the second half rounds. Thus, playing the CG initially reduced cooperation in the PD but increased mutual cooperation in the PD in the later rounds. The first result could be attributed to the subjects’ facing a more complicated situation in the G DC treatment than the G D treatment. In contrast, the second result could be attributed to the subjects’ tendency to offer similar choices between the games in the G DC treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn, T. K., E. Ostrom, D. Schmidt, R. Shupp and J. Walker (2001) “Cooperation in PD games: Fear, greed, and histroy of play,” Public Choice 106: 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B. D. and M. D. Whinston (1990) “Multimarket Contact and Collusive Behavior,” Rand Journal of Economics 21: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dal Bo, P. (2005) “Cooperation under the Shadow of the Future: Experimental Evidence from Infinitely Repeated Games,” American Economic Review 95: 1591–1604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, R. M. and R. Sherman (1988) “Mutual Forbearance under Experimental Conditions,” Southern Economic Journal 54: 985–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbacher, U. (2007) “z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Ready-made Economic Experiments,” Experimental Economics 10: 171–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knez, M. and C. Camerer (2000) “Increasing Cooperation in Prisoner’s Dilemmas by Establishing a Precedent of Efficiency in Coordination Games.” Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 82: 194–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa, K., T. Kawamura, T. Kikutani and Sobei H. Oda (2007) “The successful strategy for mutual cooperation in the experimental multi-game contact,” Kyoto University Working Paper Series No. 91.

  • Phillips, O. R. and C. F. Mason (1992), “Mutual forbearance in experimental conglomerate markets,” Rand Journal of Economics 23: 395–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, O. R. and Mason, C. F. (2001) “Collusion in Horizontally Connected Markets: Multimarket Producers as Conduits for Learning,” in B. Silverman (ed.) Multimarket Organization and Multimarket Strategy pp. 205–227.

  • Sebenius, J. K. (1983) “Negotiation Arithmetic: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties,” International Organization 37: 281–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spagnolo, G. (1999a) “On Interdependent Supergames: Multimarket Contact, Concavity and Collusion,” Journal of Economic Theory 89: 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — G. (1999b) “Social Relations and Cooperation in Organizations,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 38: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tetsuya Kawamura.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kawamura, T., Ogawa, K., Kikutani, T. et al. Is Cooperation Stimulated in a Prisoner’s Dilemma by Establishing an Efficient Outcome in a Simultaneously Played Coordination Game?: An Experimental Analysis. Evolut Inst Econ Rev 8, 279–295 (2012). https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.8.279

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.8.279

Keywords

JEL

Navigation