Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spousal Mobility and Earnings

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

An important finding in the literature on migration has been that the earnings of married women typically decrease with a move, while the earnings of married men often increase with a move, suggesting that married women are more likely to act as the “trailing spouse.” This article considers a related but largely unexplored question: what is the effect of having an occupation that is associated with frequent migration on the migration decisions of a household and on the earnings of the spouse? Further, how do these effects differ between men and women? The Public Use Microdata Sample from the 2000 U.S. decennial census is used to calculate migration rates by occupation and education. The analysis estimates the effects of these occupational mobility measures on the migration of couples and the earnings of married individuals. I find that migration rates in both the husband’s and wife’s occupations affect the household migration decision, but mobility in the husband’s occupation matters considerably more. For couples in which the husband has a college degree (regardless of the wife’s educational level), a husband’s mobility has a large, significant negative effect on his wife’s earnings, whereas a wife’s mobility has no effect on her husband’s earnings. This negative effect does not exist for college-educated wives married to non-college-educated husbands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astrom, J. and O. Westerlund. 2006. “Sex and Migration: Who is the Tied Mover?” Unpublished manuscript. Department of Economics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, A.J. and T.J. Cooke. 1998. “Family Migration and Employment: The Importance of Migration History and Gender.” International Regional Science Review 21:99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basker, E. 2003. “Education, Job Search and Migration.” Working Paper 02-17. Department of Economics, University of Missouri-Columbia.

  • Bielby, W.T. and D.D. Bielby. 1992. “I Will Follow Him: Family Ties, Gender-Role Beliefs, and Reluctance to Relocate for a Better Job.” American Journal of Sociology 97:1241–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, P., T. Cooke, K. Halfacree, and D. Smith. 1999. “Gender Inequality in Employment Status Following Family Migration in GB and the US: The Effect of Relative Occupational Status.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy19(9):109–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 2001. “A Cross-National Comparison of the Impact of Family Migration on Women’s Employment Status.” Demography 38:201–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 2002. “A Cross-National Study of the Effects of Family Migration on Women’s Labor Market Status.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 165:465–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, C.A., J.B Gelbach, and D.L. Miller. 2007. “Robust Inference With Multi-way Clustering.” Technical Working Paper No. 327. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.A.V. and Y.Q. Huang. 2006. “Balancing Move and Work: Women’s Labour Market Exits and Entries After Family Migration.” Population, Space and Place 12:31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.A.V. and S.D. Withers. 2002. “Disentangling the Interaction of Migration, Mobility and Labor-Force Participation.” Environment and Planning A 34:923–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compton, J. and R.A. Pollak. 2007. “Why Are Power Couples Increasingly Concentrated in Large Metropolitan Areas?” Journal of Labor Economics 25:475–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, T.J. 2001. “‘Trailing Wife’ or ‘Trailing Mother’? The Effects of Parental Status on the Relationship Between Family Migration and the Labor-Market Participation of Married Women.” Environment and Planning A 33:419–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 2003. “Family Migration and the Relative Earnings of Husbands and Wives.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93:338–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, T.J. and A.J. Bailey. 1996. “Family Migration and the Employment of Married Women and Men.” Economic Geography 72:38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, T.J. and K. Speirs. 2005. “Migration and Employment Among the Civilian Spouses of Military Personnel.” Social Science Quarterly 86:343–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, D.L. and M.E. Kahn. 2000. “Power Couples: Changes in the Location Choice of the College Educated, 1940-1990.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 53:648–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R.P. and C.C. Perrucci. 1976. “Dual Occupation Families and Migration.” American Sociological Review 41:252–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, J.P. and L.M. Levin. 1997. “Marriage and Migration: Comparing Gains and Losses From Migration for Couples and Singles.” Social Science Quarterly 78:688–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 2000. “The Effects of Internal Migration on the Relative Economic Status of Women and Men.” Journal of Socio-Economics 29:291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurges, H. 2006. “Gender Ideology, Division of Housework, and the Geographic Mobility of Families.” Review of Economics of the Household 4:299–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeClere, F.B. and D.K. McLaughlin. 1997. “Family Migration and Changes in Women’s Earnings: A Decomposition Analysis.” Population Research and Policy Review 16:315–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J.F. 1978. “Family Migration Decisions.” Journal of Political Economy 86:749–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D. and D. Lichter. 1988. “Family Migration and Female Employment.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 50:161–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nivalainen, S. 2004. “Determinants of Family Migration: Short Moves vs. Long Moves.” Journal of Population Economics 17:157–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabe, B. 2006, “Dual-Earner Migration in Britain. Earnings Gains, Employment, and Self-selection.” Working paper. Institute for Social and Economic Research, Ruhr-University Bochum.

  • Sandell, S.H. 1977. “Women and the Economics of Family Migration.” Review of Economics and Statistics 59:406–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, C.R. and R.D. Mare. 2005. “Trends in Educational Assortative Marriage.” Demography 42:621–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shauman, K.A. and M.C. Noonan. 2007. “Family Migration and Labor Force Outcomes: Sex Differences in Occupational Context.” Social Forces 85:1735–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shihadeh, E.S. 1991. “The Prevalence of Husband-Centered Migration: Employment Consequences for Married Mothers.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:432–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitze, G. 1984. “The Effects of Family Migration on Wives’ Employment: How Long Does It Last?” Social Science Quarterly 65:21–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Helpful comments from Robert Pollak and Ernesto Villanueva, as well as participants at the 2006 ESPE meetings, 2007 ASSA meetings, and 2007 SOLE meetings are gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mckinnish, T. Spousal Mobility and Earnings. Demography 45, 829–849 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0028

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0028

Keywords

Navigation