Skip to main content
Log in

On the auspices of female migration from Mexico to the United States

  • Migration and Its Consequences
  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

In this paper we examine the circumstances and determinants of female migration between Mexico and the United States. Using data from the Mexican Migration Project, we considered the relative timing of males’ and females’ moves northward. We then estimated logit and probit models to study the determinants of male and female out-migration; among women we also estimated a multinomial logit model to uncover differences in the process of migration for work versus not for work. We found that women almost always followed other family members, either the husband or a parent; only a tiny minority initiated migration independently. Although males also are quite likely to be introduced to migration by a parent, nearly half of all male migrants left for the United States before or without a wife or a parent. Estimates of the determinants of migration suggested that males move for employment, whereas wives generally are motivated by family reasons. Daughters, however, display a greater propensity to move for work, and the determinants of their work-related moves closely re semble those of sons and fathers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, G.S. 1991. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G.J. 1989. “Economic Theory and International Migration.” International Migration Review 23:457–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990. Friends or Strangers: The Impact of Immigrants on the U.S. Economy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1994. “The Economics of Immigration.” Journal of Economic Literature 32:667–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brettell, C.B. and R.J. Simon. 1986. “Immigrant Women: An Introduction.” Pp. 3–20 in International Migration: The Female Experience, edited by R.J. Simon and C.B. Brettel. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, L.R. 1992. Shadowed Lives: Undocumented Immigrants in American Society. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, L.R., F.A. Hubbell, S.I. Mishra, and R. Burciaga Valdez. 1997. “Undocumented Latina Immigrants in Orange County, California: A Comparative Analysis.” International Migration Review 31:88–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donato, K. 1993. “Current Trends and Patterns of Female Migration: Evidence From Mexico.” International Migration Review 27:748–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donato, K. and S.M. Kanaiaupuni. 2000. “Poverty, Demographic Change, and the Migration of Mexican Women to the U.S.” Pp. 217–42 in Women’s Position and Demographic Change, edited by N. Federici, K.O, Mason, and S. Sogner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, J., D.S. Massey, and R. Zenteno. 2001. “Mexican Immigration to the United States: Continuities and Changes.” Latin American Research Review 36:107–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa, K.E. 1997. “Helping Hands: Social Capital and the Undocumented Migration of Mexican Men to the United States.” PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Chicago.

  • Espinosa, K.E. and D.S. Massey. 1997. “Undocumented Migration and the Quantity and Quality of Social Capital.” Soziale Welt 12:141–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbertson, G. 1995. “Women’s Labor and Enclave Employment: The Case of Dominican and Columbian Women in New York City.” International Migration Review 29:157–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldring, L. 1996. “Gendered Memory: Constructions of Rurality Among Mexican Transnational Migrants.” Pp. 303–29 in Creating the Countryside: The Politics of Rural and Environmental Discourse, edited by E.M. DuPuis and P. Vandergeest. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez de la Rocha, M. 1994. The Resources of Poverty: Women and Survival in a Mexican City. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. 1961. “Snowball Sampling.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32:117–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasmuck, S. and R. Grosfoguel. 1997. “Geopolitics, Economic Niches, and Gendered Social Capital Among Caribbean Immigrants in New York.” Sociological Perspectives 40:339–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasmuck, S. and P.R. Pessar. 1991. Between Two Islands: Dominican International Migration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwell, L., R.B. Valdez, and J. DaVanzo. 1997. “Social Ties, Wages, and Gender in the Study of Salvadorean and Pilipino Immigrants in Los Angeles.” Social Science Quarterly 78:559–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J.M. 1998. “Social Networks, Gender, and Immigrant Incorporation: Resources and Constraints.” American Sociological Review 63:55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. 1992. “Overcoming Patriarchal Constraints: The Reconstruction of Gender Relations Among Mexican Immigrant Women and Men.” Gender and Society 6:393–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1994. Gendered Transitions: Mexican Experiences of Immigration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. and E. Avila. 1997. “I’m Here, but I’m There: The Meanings of Latina Transnational Motherhood.” Gender and Society 11:548–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanaiaupuni, S.M. 1995. “Why Gender Matters: The Migration Decision of Mexican Men and Women.” Presented at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association, August 19–25, Washington, DC.

  • Kossoudji, S. and S.I. Ranney. 1984. “The Labor Market Experience of Female Migrants: The Case of Temporary Mexican Migration to the U.S.” International Migration Review 18:1120–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.S. 1987. “The Ethnosurvey in Theory and Practice.” International Migration Review 21:1498–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1999. “When Surveys Fail: An Alternative Approach to Studying Illegal Migration.” Pp. 145–60 in The Science of the Self-Report: Implications for Research and Practice, edited by A.A. Stone, J.S. Turkkan, C.A. Bachrach, J.B. Jobe, M.S. Kurtzman, and V.S. Cain. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.S., R. Alarcón, J. Durand, and H. González. 1987. Return to Aztlan: The Social Process of International Migration From Western Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.S. and M. Cerrutti. Forthcoming. “Trends in Mexican Migration to the United States: 1965–1995.” Population Research and Policy Review.

  • Massey, D.S. and K.E. Espinosa. 1997. “What’s Driving Mexico-U.S. Migration? A Theoretical, Empirical, and Policy Analysis.” American Journal of Sociology 102:939–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.S., L.P. Goldring, and J. Durand. 1994. “Continuities in Transnational Migration: An Analysis of 19 Mexican Communities.” American Journal of Sociology 99:1492–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.S. and R. Zenteno. 2000. “A Validation of the Ethnosurvey: The Case of Mexico-U.S. Migration.” International Migration Review 34:765–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, V. 1996. “Migration and Marriage Among Puerto Rican Women.” International Migration Review 30:460–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrazza, S. 1991. “Women and Migration: The Social Consequences of Gender.” Annual Review of Sociology 17:303–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pessar, P.R. 1984. “The Linkage Between the Household and Workplace of Dominican Women in the U.S.” International Migration Review 18:1188–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranney, S. and S. Koussoudji. 1983. “Profiles of Temporary Mexican Labor Migrants to the United States.” Population and Development Review 9:475–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichert, J.S. and D.S. Massey. 1979. “Patterns of Migration From a Central Mexican Town to the United States: A Comparison of Legal and Illegal Migrants.” International Migration Review 13:599–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1980. “History and Trends in U.S.-Bound Migration From a Mexican Town.” International Migration Review 14:475–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repak, T.A. 1995. Waiting on Washington: Central American Workers in the Nation’s Capital. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, N.E. and R.W. Gardner. 1993. “Migration Decisions: The Role of Gender.” Pp. 195–206 in Internal Migration of Women in Developing Countries. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roldan, M. 1988. “Renegotiating the Marital Contract: Intrahousehold Patterns of Money Allocation and Women’s Subordination Among Domestic Outworkers in Mexico City.” Pp. 229–47 in A Home Divided: Women and Income in the Third World, edited by D. Dwyer and J. Bruce. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R.J. and M. Corona DeLey. 1986. “Undocumented Mexican Women: Their Work and Personal Experiences.” Pp. 114–32 in International Migration: The Female Experience, edited by R.J. Simon and C.B. Brettel. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjaastad, L.A. 1962. “The Costs and Returns of Human Migration.” Journal of Political Economy 70S:80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O. 1991. The Migration of Labor. Cambridge, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.E. 1986. “Differential Migration, Networks, Information and Risk.” Pp. 147–71 in Migration Theory, Human Capital and Development, edited by O. Stark. Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1987. “Undocumented Mexico-U.S. Migration and the Returns to Households in Rural Mexico.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69:626–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. and C.H. Brown. 1967. “On Uprooting, Kinship, and the Auspices of Migration.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 8:139–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, L. and J.W. Scott. 1978. Women Work and Family. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todaro, M.P. 1976. Internal Migration in Developing Countries. Geneva: International Labor Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todaro, M.P. and L. Maruszko. 1987. “Illegal Migration and U.S. Immigration Reform: A Conceptual Framework.” Population and Development Review 13:101–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 2000. “World Population Monitoring, 2000. Population Gender and Development” (draft). New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C. 1981. “Structural Changes and Household Strategies: A Conceptual Framework for the Study of Rural Migration.” Human Organization 40:338–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenteno, R. and D.S. Massey. 1999. “Especifidad Versus Representatividad: Enfoques Metodológicos para el Estudio de la Migración Internacional.” Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos 40:75–116.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors thank NICHD (R01 HD 35643) and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation (94-7795) for their support of this research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cerrutti, M., Massey, D.S. On the auspices of female migration from Mexico to the United States. Demography 38, 187–200 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2001.0013

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2001.0013

Keywords

Navigation