Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-Term Implications of Unplanned Conversion During Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

  • Hepatobiliary Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is increasingly utilized for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, long-term outcomes for patients requiring conversion to an open procedure during LLR have not been examined.

Methods

Patients undergoing attempted LLR for HCC were identified within the National Cancer Database. Patients undergoing successful LLR were compared with those who required unplanned conversion with regard to perioperative outcomes and overall survival (OS). Those experiencing conversion were further compared with patients who underwent planned open resection after propensity score matching.

Results

Unplanned conversion occurred in 228 (18.0%) of 1270 patients undergoing LLR. Compared with successful LLR, conversion was associated with greater length of stay (6 vs. 4 days, p < 0.001), higher readmission rates (7.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.001), and reduced OS (55.1 vs. 67.6 months, p = 0.074). Unplanned conversion during major hepatectomy was associated with significantly worse OS (median 35.7 months) compared with successful major and minor LLR (median not reached and 67.6 months, respectively, p = 0.004). Compared with planned open resection, similar results were noted as conversion during major LLR was associated with worse OS (median 27.3 months) compared with open major hepatectomy (median not reached; p = 0.002). Unplanned conversion was independently associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio 1.38) after adjustment in a multivariable model. Tumor size was the strongest predictor of conversion on logistic regression analysis.

Conclusions

Unplanned conversion during LLR for HCC is associated with inferior OS. This difference is most pronounced for major hepatectomy. LLR should be considered cautiously in patients with larger, more advanced tumors likely to require major resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Belli G, Limongelli P, Fantini C, et al. Laparoscopic and open treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Br J Surg. 2009;96(9):1041–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6680.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dagher I, Belli G, Fantini C, et al. Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a European experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(1):16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.03.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tranchart H, Di Giuro G, Lainas P, et al. Laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched-pair comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(5):1170–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0745-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cherqui D, Laurent A, Tayar C, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection for peripheral hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease. Ann Surg. 2006;243(4):499–506. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000206017.29651.99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Fancellu A, Rosman AS, Sanna V, et al. Meta-analysis of trials comparing minimally-invasive and open liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Surg Res. 2011;171(1):e33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.07.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):619–29. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000001184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection—2,804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):831–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b0c4df.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berardi G, Van Cleven S, Fretland ÅA, et al. Evolution of laparoscopic liver surgery from innovation to implementation to mastery: perioperative and oncologic outcomes of 2,238 patients from 4 European Specialized Centers. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225(5):639–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.08.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dagher I, OʼRourke N, Geller DA, et al. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):856–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181bcaf46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dagher I, Gayet B, Tzanis D, et al. International experience for laparoscopic major liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21(10):732–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kasai M, Cipriani F, Gayet B, et al. Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Surgery. 2018;163(5):985–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.01.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Troisi RI, Montalti R, Van Limmen JGM, et al. Risk factors and management of conversions to an open approach in laparoscopic liver resection: analysis of 265 consecutive cases. HPB. 2014;16(1):75–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stiles ZE, Behrman SW, Glazer ES, et al. Predictors and implications of unplanned conversion during minimally invasive hepatectomy: an analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database. HPB. 2017;19(11):957–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.06.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cauchy F, Fuks D, Nomi T, et al. Risk factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic major liver resection. Br J Surg. 2015;102(7):785–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Goh BKP, Chan C-Y, Wong J-S, et al. Factors associated with and outcomes of open conversion after laparoscopic minor hepatectomy: initial experience at a single institution. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(9):2636–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3981-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Strasberg SM. Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12(5):351–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-005-0999-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Halls MC, Cipriani F, Berardi G, et al. Conversion for unfavorable intraoperative events results in significantly worst outcomes during laparoscopic liver resection. Ann Surg. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller D, et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):825–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b3b2d8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Komatsu S, Scatton O, Goumard C, et al. Development process and technical aspects of laparoscopic hepatectomy: learning curve based on 15 years of experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. van der Poel MJ, Besselink MG, Cipriani F, et al. Outcome and learning curve in 159 consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic hemihepatectomy. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(10):923. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1655.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg. 2015;102(7):796–804. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9798.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paxton V. Dickson MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

All authors deny conflicts of interest pertinent to this work.

Additional information

Disclaimer: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) is a joint project of the Commission on Cancer (CoC) of the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society. The CoC’s NCDB and the hospitals participating in the CoC NCDB are the source of the de-identified data used herein; they have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 416 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stiles, Z.E., Glazer, E.S., Deneve, J.L. et al. Long-Term Implications of Unplanned Conversion During Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 26, 282–289 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-7073-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-7073-6

Keywords

Navigation