Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characterization of Anthropometric Changes that Occur During Neoadjuvant Therapy for Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

  • Pancreatic Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Little is known about changes in body composition that may occur during neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. This study was designed to characterize these changes and their potential relationships with therapeutic outcomes.

Methods

The study population consisted of patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer treated on a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation. Skeletal muscle and adipose tissue compartments were measured before and after administration of neoadjuvant therapy using SliceOMatic software (TomoVision, 2012) and protocol-mandated CT scans. Sarcopenia was defined using gender-adjusted norms.

Results

Among 89 eligible patients, 46 (52 %) patients met anthropometric criteria for sarcopenia prior to the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy. Further depletion of skeletal muscle, visceral adipose tissue, and subcutaneous adipose tissue occurred during neoadjuvant therapy, but these losses did not preclude the performance of potentially curative surgery. Degree of skeletal muscle loss correlated with disease-free survival while visceral adipose loss was associated with overall and progression-free survival. However, completion of all therapy, including pancreatectomy, was the only independently significant predictor of outcome in a multivariate analysis of overall survival.

Discussion

These data suggest that body composition analysis of standard CT images may provide clinically relevant information for patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer who receive neoadjuvant therapy. Anthropometric changes must be considered in the design of preoperative therapy regimens, and further efforts should focus on maintenance of muscle and visceral adipose tissue in the preoperative setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosenberg IH, Roubenoff R. Stalking sarcopenia. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:727–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peng P, Hyder O, Firoozmand A, et al. Impact of sarcopenia on outcomes following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1478–86.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dalal S, Hui D, Bidaut L, et al. Relationships among body mass index, longitudinal body composition alterations, and survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer receiving chemoradiation: a pilot study. J Pain Sympt Manag. 2012;44:181–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tan BH, Birdsell LA, Martin L, Baracos VE, Fearon KC. Sarcopenia in an overweight or obese patient is an adverse prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:6973–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Sebastiano KM, Yang L, Zbuk K, et al. Accelerated muscle and adipose tissue loss may predict survival in pancreatic cancer patients: the relationship with diabetes and anaemia. Br J Nutr. 2013;109:302–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacquillat C, Baillet F, Auclerc G, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1986;12:147–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Scholl SM, Asselain B, Palangie T, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1991;27:1668–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mehta VK, Poen J, Ford J, et al. Radiotherapy, concomitant protracted-venous-infusion 5-fluorouracil, and surgery for ultrasound-staged T3 or T4 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:52–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohiuddin M, Winter K, Mitchell E, et al. Randomized phase II study of neoadjuvant combined-modality chemoradiation for distal rectal cancer: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 0012. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:650–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ancona E, Ruol A, Santi S, et al. Only pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves significantly the long term survival of patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: final report of a randomized, controlled trial of preoperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone. Cancer. 2001;91:2165–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Walsh TN, Grennell M, Mansoor S, Kelly A. Neoadjuvant treatment of advanced stage esophageal adenocarcinoma increases survival. Dis Esophagus. 2002;15:121–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Del Fabbro E, Parsons H, Warneke CL, et al. The relationship between body composition and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with operable breast cancer. Oncologist. 2012;17:1240–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Awad S, Tan BH, Cui H, et al. Marked changes in body composition following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for oesophagogastric cancer. Clin Nutr (Edinburgh). 2012;31:74–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Clark W, Siegel EM, Chen YA, et al. Quantitative measures of visceral adiposity and body mass index in predicting rectal cancer outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:1070–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Behrman SW, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2014. J Natl Comp Cancer Netw. 2014;12:1083–93.

  16. Varadhachary GR, Wolff RA, Crane CH, et al. Preoperative gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3487–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Evans DB, Varadhachary GR, Crane CH, et al. Preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3496–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tseng JF, Raut CP, Lee JE, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection: margin status and survival duration. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:935–49; discussion 949–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Evans DB, Lee JE, Tamm EP, Pisters PWT. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple operation) and total pancreatectomy for cancer. In: Fischer J, editor Master of surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007:1299–317.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mourtzakis M, Prado CM, Lieffers JR, Reiman T, McCargar LJ, Baracos VE. A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008;33:997–1006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mehta CR, Patel NR. A network algorithm for performing Fisher’s exact test in r x c contingency tables. J Am Stat Assoc. 1983;78:427–34.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimator from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc B. 1972;34:187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lausen B, Sauerbrei W, Schumacher V. Classification and regression trees (CART) used for the exploration of prognostic factors measured on different scales. Contr Stat. 1994:483–96.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shen W, Punyanitya M, Wang Z, et al. Visceral adipose tissue: relations between single-slice areas and total volume. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:271–8.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shen W, Punyanitya M, Chen J, et al. Visceral adipose tissue: relationships between single slice areas at different locations and obesity-related health risks. Int J Obes (2005). 2007;31:763–9.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fogelman DR, Holmes H, Mohammed K, et al. Does IGFR1 inhibition result in increased muscle mass loss in patients undergoing treatment for pancreatic cancer? J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2014;5:307–13.

  28. Barret M, Antoun S, Dalban C, et al. Sarcopenia is linked to treatment toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Nutr Cancer. 2014;66:583–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wakabayashi H, Sakuma K. Rehabilitation nutrition for sarcopenia with disability: a combination of both rehabilitation and nutrition care management. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2014.

  30. Santa Mina D, Clarke H, Ritvo P, et al. Effect of totalbody prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2014;100:196–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. de Campos-Ferraz PL, Andrade I, das Neves W, Hangai I, Alves CR, Lancha AH Jr. An overview of amines as nutritional supplements to counteract cancer cachexia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2014;5:105–10.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Di Girolamo FG, Situlin R, Mazzucco S, Valentini R, Toigo G, Biolo G. Omega-3 fatty acids and protein metabolism: enhancement of anabolic interventions for sarcopenia. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2014;17:145–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Morley JE, von Haehling S, Anker SD. Are we closer to having drugs to treat muscle wasting disease? J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2014;5:83–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hong DS, Hui D, Bruera E, et al. MABp1, a first-in-class true human antibody targeting interleukin-1alpha in refractory cancers: an open-label, phase 1 dose-escalation and expansion study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:656–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Katz MH, Marsh R, Herman JM, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: need for standardization and methods for optimal clinical trial design. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2787–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Supported by the Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Foundation and by the Various Donor Pancreatic Research Fund at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. ABC is also supported by a grant from the Foundation of Surgical Fellowships. RS is part of the Biostatistics Shared Resource supported by the NIH/NCI under award number P30CA016672.

Disclosures

There are no relevant financial disclosures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew H. G. Katz MD.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10434_2014_4285_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Figure S1. Anthropometric analysis. The cross sectional areas of the skeletal muscle (red), subcutaneous adipose tissue (light blue) and visceral adipose tissue (dark blue) compartments were computed using CT images obtained as part of routine care, and were standardized to the square of the height in meters. Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 831 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cooper, A.B., Slack, R., Fogelman, D. et al. Characterization of Anthropometric Changes that Occur During Neoadjuvant Therapy for Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 2416–2423 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4285-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4285-2

Keywords

Navigation