Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical Usefulness of [18F]FDG PET-CT and CT/MRI for Detecting Nodal Metastasis in Patients with Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • Head and Neck Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate whether pretreatment imaging modalities, including [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and CT/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are helpful for the selection of patient groups requiring contralateral neck dissection in patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

Methods

A total of 72 consecutive patients with histologically proven hypopharyngeal SCC who underwent both PET-CT and CT/MRI preoperatively were recruited. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of each imaging modality, the neck was divided into levels based on the imaging-based nodal classification, and the histopathologic results of the surgical specimen were used as a standard reference.

Results

Fifty-one (70.8 %) of the 72 patients had neck metastasis, and 12 (26.7 %) had contralateral metastatic nodes. The sensitivities of PET-CT and CT/MRI for detecting nodal metastasis in the contralateral neck were significantly lower than those in the ipsilateral neck (60.0 and 53.3 vs. 89.1 and 84.8 %, respectively; p < 0.001). Among the patients who underwent bilateral neck dissection (n = 45), three (13.0 %) of the 23 patients with a palpably negative neck on the ipsilateral side showed occult contralateral lymph node metastasis, while none of the 11 patients without ipsilateral metastatic nodes on imaging studies had contralateral neck metastasis.

Conclusions

With accurate assessment of ipsilateral neck metastasis in hypopharyngeal SCC patients, PET-CT and CT/MRI may be helpful in identifying patients at high risk of contralateral neck metastasis. Elective contralateral neck treatment is not necessary in hypopharyngeal SCC patients who do not show evidence of ipsilateral neck metastasis on preoperative imaging studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koo BS, Lim YC, Lee JS, et al. Management of contralateral N0 neck in pyriform sinus carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:1268-72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gourin CG, Terris DJ. Carcinoma of the hypopharynx. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2004;13:81-98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Buckley JG, MacLennan K. Cervical node metastases in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer: a prospective analysis of prevalence and distribution. Head Neck. 2000;22:380-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chu PY, Wang LW, Chang SY. Surgical treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx: analysis of treatment results, failure patterns, and prognostic factors. J Laryngol Otol. 2004;118:443-9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Varghese BT, Sebastian P, Mathew A. Treatment outcome in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma larynx and hypopharynx: a follow-up study. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009;129:1480-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chan JY, Wei WI. Current management strategy of hypopharyngeal carcinoma. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2013;40:2-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferlito A, Silver CE, Rinaldo A. Neck dissection: present and future? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;265:621-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Amar A, Dedivitis RA, Rapoport A, et al. Indication of elective contralateral neck dissection in squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;75:493-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weiss MH, Harrison LB, Isaacs RS. Use of decision analysis in planning a management strategy for the stage N0 neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120:699-702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Snow GB, Patel P, Leemans CR, et al. Management of cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1992;249:187-94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van den Brekel MW, Stel HV, Castelijns JA, et al. Cervical lymph node metastasis: assessment of radiologic criteria. Radiology. 1990;177:379-84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stern WB, Silver CE, Zeifer BA, et al. Computed tomography of the clinically negative neck. Head Neck. 1990;12:109-13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Friedman M, Mafee MF, Pacella BL Jr, et al. Rationale for elective neck dissection in 1990. Laryngoscope. 1990;100:54-9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hao SP, Ng SH. Magnetic resonance imaging versus clinical palpation in evaluating cervical metastasis from head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123:324-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kyzas PA, Evangelou E, Denaxa-Kyza D, et al. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to evaluate cervical node metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:712-20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, et al. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:480-508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Som PM, Curtin HD, Mancuso AA. Imaging-based nodal classification for evaluation of neck metastatic adenopathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:837-44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang W, Davis CS, Soong SJ. Comparison of predictive values of two diagnostic tests from the same sample of subjects using weighted least squares. Stat Med. 2006;25:2215-29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837-45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim SY, Kim JS, Doo H, et al. Combined [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography for detecting contralateral neck metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2011;47:376-80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fukui MB, Blodgett TM, Snyderman CH, et al. Combined PET-CT in the head and neck: part 2. Diagnostic uses and pitfalls of oncologic imaging. Radiographics. 2005;25:913-30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stoeckli SJ, Steinert H, Pfaltz M, et al. Is there a role for positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in the initial staging of nodal negative oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2002;24:345-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ng SH, Yen TC, Chang JT, et al. Prospective study of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma with palpably negative neck. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4371-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Murakami R, Uozumi H, Hirai T, et al. Impact of FDG-PET/CT imaging on nodal staging for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:377-82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

There are no financial conflicts of interest in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinna Kim MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, NY., Lee, JH., Kang, W.J. et al. Clinical Usefulness of [18F]FDG PET-CT and CT/MRI for Detecting Nodal Metastasis in Patients with Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 994–999 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4062-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4062-2

Keywords

Navigation