Skip to main content
Log in

Incidental Detection of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Analysis of Incidence and Outcomes

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are increasingly discovered incidentally during radiologic or endoscopic examinations. The frequency of incidental detection is unknown. It is also unclear whether patients with incidentally discovered, early-stage, asymptomatic tumors should be treated similarly to patients who present with tumor-related symptoms.

Methods

Patients with nonmetastatic pancreatic NETs treated at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center between 1999 and 2010 were assigned a stage (I–III) on the basis of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer classification. The frequency of incidentally diagnosed tumors was evaluated and stratified by stage. Progression-free survival was measured by log rank testing to compare patients with incidentally detected versus symptomatic tumors. Multivariate analysis was performed controlling for other prognostic factors including tumor stage, grade, and location, and patient age.

Results

Among 143 patients with nonmetastatic pancreatic NETs, 56 patients (40%) had tumors that were discovered incidentally. Most stage I tumors (55%) were incidental. The 5-year progression-free survival rate was 86% for incidentally diagnosed tumors, versus 59% for symptomatic tumors (P = 0.007). On multivariate analysis, incidental detection of tumors was the strongest prognostic factor for progression.

Conclusions

A sizable fraction of patients with early-stage pancreatic NETs are diagnosed incidentally during evaluations for other conditions or unrelated symptoms. This study highlights the necessity of developing guidelines for management of patients with incidentally discovered early-stage tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, et al. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3063–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fesinmeyer MD, Austin MA, Li CI, et al. Differences in survival by histologic type of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1766–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Halfdanarson TR, Rubin J, Farnell MB, et al. Pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: epidemiology and prognosis of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2008;15:409–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Halfdanarson TR, Rabe KG, Rubin J, Petersen GM. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs): incidence, prognosis and recent trend toward improved survival. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:1727–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Strosberg J, Gardner N, Kvols L. Survival and prognostic factor analysis in patients with metastatic pancreatic endocrine carcinomas. Pancreas. 2009;38:255–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zerbi A, Falconi M, Rindi G, et al. Clinicopathological features of pancreatic endocrine tumors: a prospective multicenter study in Italy of 297 sporadic cases. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1421–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vagefi PA, Razo O, Deshpande V, et al. Evolving patterns in the detection and outcomes of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: the Massachusetts General Hospital experience from 1977 to 2005. Arch Surg. 2007;142:347–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosch T, Lightdale CJ, Botet JF, et al. Localization of pancreatic endocrine tumors by endoscopic ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1721–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Khashab MA, Yong E, Lennon AM, et al. EUS is still superior to multidetector computerized tomography for detection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:691–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clark OH, Benson AB 3rd, Berlin JD, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: neuroendocrine tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009;7:712–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kulke MH, Anthony LB, Bushnell DL, et al. NANETS treatment guidelines: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach and pancreas. Pancreas. 2010;39:735–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. AJCC. Cancer staging manual. 7th edn. New York: Springer; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Research support

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan R. Strosberg MD.

Additional information

This study was performed at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheema, A., Weber, J. & Strosberg, J.R. Incidental Detection of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Analysis of Incidence and Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 19, 2932–2936 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2285-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2285-7

Keywords

Navigation