Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multifocality in “Basal-Like” Breast Carcinomas and its Influence on Lymph Node Status

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Basal-like breast carcinomas often are regarded for circumscribed solitary lesions having unfavorable prognosis. On the other hand, a considerable proportion of breast carcinomas is multifocal and has increased metastatic potential. In this study, we analyzed the subgross distribution of the lesions in a series of basal-like carcinomas, compared it with that in nonbasal-like tumors and studied the frequency of vascular invasion and lymph node metastasis in relation to focality of the lesions.

Methods

A total of 511 consecutive cases documented in large-format histologic sections were studied. Tumors expressing at least one of the basal (myoepithelial) markers (CK5/6, CK14, EGFR) in at least one of the invasive tumor foci were categorized as basal-like tumors. Triple-negative (ER/PR/HER-2-negative) basal-like carcinomas also were analyzed. The distribution of lesions and the frequency of vascular invasion and lymph node metastasis were analyzed. The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Committee Uppsala-Örebro.

Results

In 44% of cases, the invasive component was multifocal or diffuse. Combining the in situ and invasive tumor components resulted in 61% of cases with multifocal/diffuse distribution. The only statistically significant difference observed was that basal-like tumors lacked in situ components more often (21% vs. 9%; P = 0.0075). No significant differences could be demonstrated regarding vascular invasion and lymph node status. Lymph node metastasis appeared significantly more frequently in multifocal cases in both tumor categories.

Conclusions

Basal-like breast carcinomas are as frequently multifocal as their non-basal-like counterparts; multifocality is associated with increased risk for vascular invasion and lymph node metastasis in both tumor categories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perue CM, Sorlie T, Elsen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumors. Nature. 2000;406:747–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:8418–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nielsen TO, Forrest DH, Jensen K, et al. Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Clinical Cancer Res. 2004;10:5367–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Livasy CA, Karaca G, Nanda R, et al. Phenotype evaluation of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:264–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheang MC, Voduc D, Bajdik C, et al. Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value than triple-negative phenotype. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:1368–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rakha EA, Ellis IO. Triple-negative/basal-like breast cancer: a review. Pathology. 2009;41:40–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fulford LG, Easton DF, Reis–Filho JS, et al. Specific morphological features predictive for the basal phenotype in grade 3 invasive ductal carcinomas. Histopathology. 2006;49:22–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR, et al. Breast carcinoma with basal differentiation: a proposal for pathology definition based on basal cytokeratin expression. Histopathology. 2007;50:434–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tamimi RM, Baer HJ, Marotti J, et al. Comparison of molecular phenotypes of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10:R67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moinfar F. Is ‘basal-like’ carcinoma of the breast a distinct clinicopathological entity? A critical review with cautionary notes. Pathobiology. 2008;75:119–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rakha E, Reis-Filho JS. Basal-like breast carcinoma: from expression profiling to routine practice. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:860–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Luck AA, Evans AJ, James JJ, et al. Breast carcinoma with basal phenotype: mammographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:346–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsuda H, Takarabe T, Hasegawa T, et al. Myoepithelial differentiation in high-grade invasive ductal carcinomas with large central acellular zones. Hum Pathol. 1999;30:1134–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tot T. Clinical relevance of the distribution of the lesions in 500 consecutive breast cancer cases documented in large-format histological sections. Cancer. 2007;110:2551–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tot T. The metastatic capacity of multifocal breast carcinomas: extensive tumors versus tumors of limited extent. Hum Pathol. 2009;40:199–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tot T, Pekár G, Hofmeyer S, et al. The distribution of the lesions in 1-14-mm invasive breast carcinomas and its relation to metastatic potential. Virchows Arch. 2009;445:109–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tot T, Tabár L, Dean PB. Practical breast pathology. New York: Thieme; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, et al. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast conserving surgery. Cancer. 1985;56:979–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Luttges J, Kalbfleisch H, Prinz P. Nipple involvement and multicentricity in breast cancer. A study of whole organ sections. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1987;113:481–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bryan BB, Schnitt SJ, Collins LC. Ductal carcinoma in situ with basal-like phenotype: a possible precursor to invasive basal-like breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:617–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chua B, Ung O, Taylor R, Boyages J. Frequency and predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in invasive breast cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2001;71:723–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pedersen L, Gunnarsdottir KA, Rasmussen BB, et al. The prognostic influence of multifocality in breast cancer patients. Breast. 2004;13:188–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Coombs NJ, Boyages J. Multifocal and multicentric breast cancer: does each focus matter? J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7497–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA. 2006;295:2492–502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in connection with this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tibor Tot.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tot, T., Pekár, G. Multifocality in “Basal-Like” Breast Carcinomas and its Influence on Lymph Node Status. Ann Surg Oncol 18, 1671–1677 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1480-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1480-7

Keywords

Navigation